Iyyun

Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly ("Iyyun" literally means "inquiry" or "study") is published by the S. H. Bergman Center for Philosophical Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. It was established in 1945 as a Hebrew philosophical quarterly by Martin Buber, S. H. Bergman, and Julius Guttmann. As of volume 39 (1990), Iyyun appears four times a year: January and July in English, April and October in Hebrew. Each English issue carries abstracts of the articles in the previous Hebrew issue.

Iyyun
DisciplinePhilosophy
LanguageEnglish, Hebrew
Edited byMark Steiner, Eva Shorr
Publication details
History1945–present
Publisher
S. H. Bergman Center for Philosophical Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Israel)
FrequencyQuarterly
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Iyyun
Indexing
ISSN0021-3306
LCCNhe65000235
OCLC no.242373817
Links

Volume 1, no. 1 was published in October 1945, and it included papers by Ernst Cassirer, Felix Weltsch, Fritz Heinemann, Nathan Rotenstreich, and others. A double issue (vol. 1, nos. 2-3) followed in November 1946, and the fourth one appeared in July 1949, that is, from the end of World War II and through the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. Ever since January 1951 (vol. 2, no. 1), Iyyun has appeared regularly.

Notable articles

The following is a list of some notable articles in Iyyun:

  • "A Problem in the Empiricist Construal of Theories" (1972) - Carl G. Hempel (Hebrew with English summary)
  • "The Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers" (1990) - Charles Parsons
  • "A Lecture on Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed" (1998) - Shlomo Pines (Hebrew)
  • "Consciousness and the Mind" (2002) - David M. Rosenthal
  • "Self-knowledge, Intentionality, and Normativity" (2005) - Akeel Bilgrami
  • "On the Usefulness of final ends" - Harry Frankfurt
  • "Dialogism and the Scientific Method" (2007) - Mara Beller
  • "A Note on Steiner on Wittgenstein, Godel, and Tarski" (2008) - Hilary Putnam
gollark: They never consider the implications of that sort of replicator/teleporter technology.
gollark: Though I might be a bit worried about it since it *might* randomly disintegrate me or something if there's a bug in the reassembly bit.
gollark: If it's a very accurate reconstruction, I personally don't really mind.
gollark: Star Trek is nothing if not wildly inconsistent.
gollark: I mean, it's non-survivable under some notions of identity.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.