Investment Canada Act

The Investment Canada Act (ICA)[1] is a Canadian Federal law governing large foreign direct investment in Canada. The ICA was one of the first acts of Brian Mulroney's newly elected Progressive Conservative government, receiving royal assent on 20 June 1985. It has been amended at various times, including recently the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act.[1][2] Pertinent regulations include the Investment Canada Regulations, SOR/85-611.[3] The Act empowers the government to forbid foreign investments of "significant" size if they do not present a "net benefit to Canada." As of 2017, Canadian policy is to consider over $1 billion "significant."[4] The determination of what substantially constitutes the locus of control of a corporation is governed by the Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act.[5]

History

The Act was intended to signal Canada's openness to foreign investment and coincided with a narrowed mandate of the Foreign Investment Review Agency (FIRA), which was renamed Investment Canada. FIRA had been set up by Pierre Trudeau's Liberal government to limit increasing US ownership of Canadian business.[6] Canadian nationalists criticized FIRA's effectiveness, noting that in practice it was rarely used to actually forbid an investment.[7] The business community and opposition Progressive Conservative Party criticized FIRA for its activism, saying it had stifled investment from the emerging global economy.[8]

Effects

All transactions that are acquisitions of a Canadian business by non-Canadians must be "notified" (ICA ss. 11-12), but only those above a 5 million dollar threshold (or 50 million dollars for indirect investments, such as shares) are reviewable (ICA s. 14). If the investor is a WTO member, the threshold was 320 million in 2012.

World Trade Organization membership shown in dark green.

The Act empowers a Director of Investments, who as of April 2015 is Deputy Minister of Industry John Knubley,[9][10] to produce decisions, and reports of decisions.[11] The thresholds, for valuations above which the ICA is to be invoked, are (according to the legislation) several and hinge on whether or not the investors are part of the World Trade Organization.[12]

While the ICA gives Investment Canada the power to restrict investment, its mandate is only to "review...significant investments...in a manner that encourages investment, economic growth and employment opportunities" unless proposed investments specifically injure national security.[13][14] According to labour economist Jim Stanford, the Mulroney government never invoked the Act to deter a foreign investment, nor did its successors, the Chrétien and Martin Liberal governments.[15]

Foreign investment in Canada rose significantly in the wake of the ICA, from approximately $100 billion in 1985 to over $550 billion in 2006.[16][17]

The ICA was invoked for the first time when in 2008 the Conservative government of Stephen Harper blocked the sale of the space division of MacDonald, Dettwiler & Associates, a Vancouver-area technology company, to US-based Alliant Techsystems.[18] As of November 2010, the federal government had reviewed 1,637 takeovers since 1985 and rejected only one, that of MDA.[19]

On 3 November 2010, then-Minister of Industry Tony Clement imposed conditions for approval of the hostile takeover for over $38bn of Potash Corporation by Australia-based mining conglomerate BHP Billiton.[19][20] On 15 November 2010, BHP-Billiton withdrew its bid, saying the conditions had proved too onerous.[21]

Criticism

While the Act was not used to formally block takeover bids and investments, its presence and vague mandate enables diplomats, public representatives and civil servants to informally dissuade investors, and creates a sense of government risk amongst foreign investment analysts. The scale of impact is difficult to measure and has not been widely studied.

Nationalist critics believe the Act is too narrow and, as a matter of policy, should more heavily restrict foreign investment.

Critics note that Canada's share of world direct investment fell significantly after 1985.[22] Some of this is due to large increases in emerging economies' receipt of FDI, but Canada's share has fallen even amongst developed countries,[23] and in the late 2000s Canada became a net investor in the world.[16][24]

Some critics note that the Harper government's use of the ICA has seemed unpredictable, resulting in a "chilling" effect on foreign investment in Canadian companies. This hidden effect, if it exists, could suppress the value of Canadian shares and companies by deterring potential investors from even considering Canada as a market or destination.[25] In response to this criticism, on 15 November 2010 the Harper government signalled its intention to provide clear guidelines for its use of the ICA.[26]

gollark: No.
gollark: Life expectancy is apparently fairly high for hunter-gathering types ignoring very high infant mortality.
gollark: What problems? We mostly don't get mauled by animals and die of tuberculosis and whatnot.
gollark: They still don't actually have any access to medicine.
gollark: They're very different cultures. There are more factors than "has technology" or not.

References
  1. Full text of Investment Canada Act legislation
  2. "Economic Action Plan 2013 Act", No. 1, SC 2013, c 33
  3. Investment Canada Regulations, SOR/85-611
  4. "Investment Canada Act". Industry Canada. Government of Canada. Retrieved 26 July 2014.
  5. "Canadian Ownership and Control Determination Act", RSC 1985, c C-20
  6. "The impact of government policies on foreign direct investment: the Canadian experience." Article from: Journal of International Business Studies, 22 Sep 1999 by Steven Globerman and Daniel M Shapiro
  7. "FIRA: Instrument of Regulation or Vote-Maximization"; Pauwels, Jacques R. 23 Osgoode Hall L. J. 131 (1985)
  8. Hillmer, Norman (December 16, 2013). "Foreign Investment Review Agency". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
  9. ic.gc.ca: "Investment Canada Act - Investment Review Division Personnel"
  10. ic.gc.ca: "About Us - Deputy Minister"
  11. ic.gc.ca: "Investment Canada Act - Annual Reports"
  12. ic.gc.ca: "Investment Canada Act - Thresholds for Review"
  13. ic.gc.ca: "" Archived July 24, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  14. ic.gc.ca: "Investment Canada Act", on archive.org
  15. rabble.ca: "The pros and cons of foreign investment" by Jim Stanford, 12 Nov 2010
  16. Trade Policy Review 2010, Ch. 9: "Canadian Inward and Outward Direct Investment: Assessing the Impacts", S Rao, M Souare and W Wang (see page 319)
  17. Office of the Chief Economist - "Foreign Direct Investment Statistics"
  18. Takeover reference: "The Investment Canada Act – Canada’s waking giant?", by E Dufour and I Ahmad, 9 Nov 2010
  19. cbc.ca: "BHP's PotashCorp bid rejected for now", 3 Nov 2010
  20. "Canada rejects BHP Billiton takeover of Potash Corp". Yahoo! Asia News. November 4, 2010. Archived from the original on 8 November 2010. Retrieved 21 February 2018.
  21. ctv.ca: "BHP Billiton withdraws bid for Canada's Potash Corp.", 15 Nov 2010
  22. Globerman, Steven. "Canadian Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Its Implications for the Canadian Economy". The Conference Board of Canada. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
  23. (page 8)
  24. (page 13)
  25. Legal paper: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9a0bbc4e-175b-4b84-b515-9a78e883d4c5
  26. thestar.com: "Canada’s investment controls among weakest in the world", op-ed by Tim Armstrong, 15 Nov 2010
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.