Imponderable fluid

Imponderable fluids are features of several superseded scientific theories, such as archaic atomic and electromotive theories.

Description

The term has been used in natural philosophy and physics to explain certain phenomena as the result of invisible and practically weightless (Latin: imponderabilis) fluids. Historically proposed imponderable fluids include phlogiston and caloric; additionally some physicists considered electricity imponderable.[1][2]

Fluids theories

In an article published in 1868, English inventor and polymath Fleeming Jenkin described myriad hypotheses of physics that had been put forth involving imponderable fluids:[3]

Leibniz mentions with great disapproval a certain Hartsoeker who supposed that atoms moved in an ambient fluid, though the idea is not unlike his own. It is difficult to trace the origin of the hypothesis, but Galileo and Hobbes both speak of a subtle ether. The conception of an all-pervading imponderable fluid of this kind has formed part of many theories, and ether came to be very generally adopted as a favourite name for the fluid, but caloric was also much thought of as a medium. We even find half-a-dozen imponderable co-existent fluids regarded with favour,—one called heat, another electricity, another phlogiston, another light, and what not, with little hard atoms swimming about, each endowed with forces of repulsion and attraction of all sorts, as was thought desirable. This idea of the constitution of matter was perhaps the worst of all. These imponderable fluids were mere names, and these forces were suppositions, representing no observed facts.

No attempt was made to show how or why the forces acted, but gravitation being taken as due to a mere "force", speculators thought themselves at liberty to imagine any number of forces, attractive or repulsive, or alternating, varying as the distance,[4] or the square, cube, or higher power of the distance, etc. At last, Ruđer Bošković[5] got rid of atoms altogether, by supposing them to be the mere centre of forces exerted by a position or point only, where nothing existed but the power of exerting a force.[6]

The electric fluid

Study of the laws which govern electrical forces, let an apparatus be provided, called an electric pendulum.[7] Effects were explained by the supposition that a subtle and imponderable fluid developed upon the glass tube which is self-repulsive; that by touching the balls, a portion of this fluid has been imparted to them, which is diffused over their surface, and which, for reasons that will hereafter appear, cannot escape by the thread of suspension; that the fluid remaining on the glass tube repels this fluid diffused on the balls, and therefore repels the balls themselves which are invested by the fluid; and, in fine, that the fluid diffused on the one ball repels and is repelled by the fluid diffused on the other ball, and that the balls being covered by the fluid are reciprocally repelled.[7] A vast body of phenomena had converted this supposition into a certainty for the time, accepted by all scientific authorities. The fluid producing these effects was called the "Electric Fluid", now called the electric field.

M. Martin Ziegler[8] patented a method of producing a "vital fluid" by combining nitrogen and carbon in a porous cell containing ammonia, immersed in a vessel tilled with molasses. The current was to flow through silk threads attached to the vessel: about 1868.[9]

Further information: Fluid theory of electricity
gollark: Mostly he would have to ask Hermione or whoever.
gollark: Well, they didn't have that.
gollark: I was going to say that "magic is magic mostly because we can't really do it in reality", but actually there is fiction where magic does approximately the same things as what modern tech does but with a slightly different aesthetic.
gollark: I'm sure there are others, I just can't immediately think of any.
gollark: Um. I have never actually *read* it but apparently Robert Jackson Bennet's *Foundryside* has a programmingish magic system?

See also

References
  1. Textbook of Human Physiology, Leonard Landois , William Stirling, 1889
  2. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, Stathis Psillos, 1999, Routledge
  3. Jenkin, Fleeming (1868). "The Atomic Theory of Lucretius". The North British Review. 48: 239. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  4. Time of describing a given space from rest under the action of a force varying as the distance from a fixed point. Principia By Sir Isaac Newton. Pg., 86
  5. As defined by Boscovich and the French School, an atom was no longer a substantial entity, but a mathematical point, a center of force, and "matter" is a crowd of such points, endowed with inertia and powers of attraction and repulsion.(The Monist: Volume 20. By Edward C. Hegeler, Paul Carus, Hegeler Institute, 1910. Page 220.)
  6. The North British review. (1868). Edinburgh: W.P. Kennedy Pg 126.
  7. J Lardner, D. (1853 ). A hand-book of mechanics. Philadelphia 223.
  8. U.S. patent 60986, Improved imponderable fluid, and mode of generating the same. Jan 1, 1867.
  9. Haydn, J., & In Vincent, B. (1893). Haydn's dictionary of dates and universal information relating to all ages and nations. N.Y: G.P. Putnam Pg 28

Further reading
  • Grove, W. R. (1874). The correlation of physical forces. London: Longmans, Green.
  • Priestley, J. (1767). The history and present state of electricity: With original experiments, by Joseph Priestley. London.
  • Grotthus, "Sur la Composition de l'Eau et des Corps quelle tient en dissolution a l'aide de l'Electricite galvanique". (Tr., On the Composition of Water Bodies and what holds in solution with the aid of galvanic electricity.)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.