Horizontal drillhole disposal

Deep Horizontal drillhole disposal is the concept of disposing high-level radioactive waste from nuclear reactor in deep horizontal boreholes instead of in more traditional deep geological repositories that are excavated like mines. The design concept is intended to improve upon the vertical borehole concept developed by Sandia National Laboratories,[1] by utilizing modern advancements in directional drilling technology as well as using isotopic methods to measure the affinity a host rock has for isolation.[2][3]

illustration of deep horizontal drillhole disposal concept

American demonstration

A series of tests of the disposal technology were carried out privately in November 2018 and then publicly in January 2019.[4] The test demonstrated emplacement of a test-canister in a horizontal drillhole, and retrieval of the same canister. There was no actual high-level waste used in this test.

Details

Horizontal drillhole disposal describes proposals to drill over one kilometer vertically, and two kilometers horizontally in the earth’s crust, for the purpose of disposing of high-level waste forms such as spent nuclear fuel, Caesium-137, or Strontium-90.

This system consists of a drilllhole which is bored from a rig on the surface into a suitable isolated sedimentary, igneous or metamorphic host rock. Drilling is imposed vertically to a depth as much as 5 kilometers (3.1 miles) and then gradually changes direction by 90 degrees to the horizontal section where the waste is destined to be disposed. After emplacement, the drillhole is backfilled and sealed.[5][6]

This concept seeks to be applied to multiple waste streams from spent nuclear fuel to weapon’s waste, therefore canister diameter and length vary upon waste form.[7] Canisters are made of a nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloy, and are designed to be retrieved for a period of up to 50 years prior to permanent closure.[8][9]

Location of appropriate sites

United States

Every state in the U.S. has deep rocks suitable for its own borehole repository.[10] Suitable host rocks include isolated sedimentary, igneous or metamorphic host rocks.

Speed of construction

Scientists at the University of Sheffield in England say that deep boreholes for nuclear waste disposal can be built faster than a traditional deep geological repository that is excavated like an underground mine for waste disposal.[11] The University of Sheffield engineers say that a borehole could be drilled, filled and sealed in no more than five years, in contrast to the decades required for a mined repository.[12]

History

United States

Beginning in 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy funded an experimental borehole extending over 3 miles (4.8 km) deep, in Rugby, North Dakota. The plans for this five-year project in Rugby did not involve nuclear waste, and instead would have tested other aspects of the borehole concept[13] However, following protests in North Dakota, a site was proposed in Spink County, South Dakota. After protests in South Dakota prevented the project from moving forward, the Department of Energy scrapped the project.[14]

Due to public opposition to the first experimental borehole, in late 2016 the Department of Energy announced a second project which would have involved four sites; two in New Mexico, one in Texas and one in South Dakota. The early stages of the project required gaining public support before the Department of Energy would have selected a final site for an experimental borehole. On 23 May 2017, the Department of Energy announced that funding priorities had changed and that the deep borehole project was defunded.[15]

In 2018 and 2019, a private company did a series of tests in Cameron, Texas that demonstrated the use of boreholes via a horizontal drillhole disposal system. This was done privately in November 2018, and then publicly in January 2019.[16] The tests included emplacement of a mock-up canister, and its retrieval. There was no actual high-level waste used in this test.[17]

gollark: It is probably a highlight.js issue.
gollark: It is not a markdown issue.
gollark: * 🐝s 🐝s 🐝s 🐝s 🐝s
gollark: Also, as far as I know laptop GPUs are soldered to the mainboard and nigh-impossible to replace.
gollark: Quite possibly.

See also

References
  1. Nature, “US Seeks Waste-research revival” https://www.nature.com/news/us-seeks-waste-research-revival-1.14804
  2. Disposal of High-Level Nuclear Waste in Deep Horizontal Drillholes, Published May 29th, 2019 https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2052
  3. Mallants, Dirk; Travis, Karl; Chapman, Neil; Brady, Patrick V.; Griffiths, Hefin (February 14, 2020). "The State of the Science and Technology in Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste". Energies. 13 (4): 833. doi:10.3390/en13040833.
  4. Conca, James (January 31, 2019). "Can We Drill a Hole Deep Enough for Our Nuclear Waste?". Forbes.
  5. Muller, Richard A.; Finsterle, Stefan; Grimsich, John; Baltzer, Rod; Muller, Elizabeth A.; Rector, James W.; Payer, Joe; Apps, John (May 29, 2019). "Disposal of High-Level Nuclear Waste in Deep Horizontal Drillholes". Energies. 12 (11): 2052. doi:10.3390/en12112052.
  6. Mallants, Dirk; Travis, Karl; Chapman, Neil; Brady, Patrick V.; Griffiths, Hefin (February 14, 2020). "The State of the Science and Technology in Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste". Energies. 13 (4): 833. doi:10.3390/en13040833.
  7. Storing hazardous material in a subterranean formation, #US10002683B2 https://patents.google.com/patent/US10002683B2/
  8. 10 CFR Part 60, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in Geologic Repositories. § 60.111 Performance of the geologic repository operations area through permanent closure. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part060/full-text.html
  9. "Storing hazardous material in a subterranean formation, #US10002683B2".
  10. Conca, James. "DOE Tries To Change The Rules On Nuclear Waste Disposal". Forbes.
  11. Gibb, Fergus (2007). "The Deep Borehole Disposal Option for Spent Nuclear Fuel". University of Sheffield. Archived from the original Archived 2007-07-23 at the Wayback Machine 7 February 2012.
  12. Gibb, Fergus (2007). "The Deep Borehole Disposal Option for Spent Nuclear Fuel". University of Sheffield. Archived from the original Archived 2007-07-23 at the Wayback Machine 7 February 2012.
  13. Nowatzki, Mike. "Officials raise 'deep concern' that proposed drilling project near Rugby could lead to nuclear waste disposal in N.D.", INFORUM (January 28, 2016).
  14. Voosen, Paul (2016-09-27). "Protests spur rethink on deep borehole test for nuclear waste". Science (AAAS). Retrieved 2018-01-18.
  15. Orr, Franklin (Lynn) (23 May 2017). "Studying the Feasibility of Deep Boreholes". Retrieved 2018-01-18.
  16. Conca, James (January 31, 2019). "Can We Drill a Hole Deep Enough for Our Nuclear Waste?". Forbes.
  17. "Technology". Deep Isolation. Retrieved 2020-07-21.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.