Hochschild homology

In mathematics, Hochschild homology (and cohomology) is a homology theory for associative algebras over rings. There is also a theory for Hochschild homology of certain functors. Hochschild cohomology was introduced by Gerhard Hochschild (1945) for algebras over a field, and extended to algebras over more general rings by Henri Cartan and Samuel Eilenberg (1956).

Definition of Hochschild homology of algebras

Let k be a field, A an associative k-algebra, and M an A-bimodule. The enveloping algebra of A is the tensor product Ae=AAo of A with its opposite algebra. Bimodules over A are essentially the same as modules over the enveloping algebra of A, so in particular A and M can be considered as Ae-modules. Cartan & Eilenberg (1956) defined the Hochschild homology and cohomology group of A with coefficients in M in terms of the Tor functor and Ext functor by

Hochschild complex

Let k be a ring, A an associative k-algebra that is a projective k-module, and M an A-bimodule. We will write An for the n-fold tensor product of A over k. The chain complex that gives rise to Hochschild homology is given by

with boundary operator di defined by

where ai is in A for all 1 ≤ in and mM. If we let

then so (Cn(A,M), b) is a chain complex called the Hochschild complex, and its homology is the Hochschild homology of A with coefficients in M.

Remark

The maps di are face maps making the family of modules Cn(A,M) a simplicial object in the category of k-modules, i.e. a functor Δok-mod, where Δ is the simplex category and k-mod is the category of k-modules. Here Δo is the opposite category of Δ. The degeneracy maps are defined by

Hochschild homology is the homology of this simplicial module.

Hochschild homology of functors

The simplicial circle S1 is a simplicial object in the category of finite pointed sets, i.e. a functor Thus, if F is a functor F: Fin → k-mod, we get a simplicial module by composing F with S1

The homology of this simplicial module is the Hochschild homology of the functor F. The above definition of Hochschild homology of commutative algebras is the special case where F is the Loday functor.

Loday functor

A skeleton for the category of finite pointed sets is given by the objects

where 0 is the basepoint, and the morphisms are the basepoint preserving set maps. Let A be a commutative k-algebra and M be a symmetric A-bimodule. The Loday functor L(A,M) is given on objects in by

A morphism

is sent to the morphism given by

where

Another description of Hochschild homology of algebras

The Hochschild homology of a commutative algebra A with coefficients in a symmetric A-bimodule M is the homology associated to the composition

and this definition agrees with the one above.

Topological Hochschild homology

The above construction of the Hochschild complex can be adapted to more general situations, namely by replacing the category of (complexes of) k-modules by an ∞-category (equipped with a tensor product) C, and A by an associative algebra in this category. Applying this to the category C = Sp of spectra, and A being the Eilenberg–MacLane spectrum associated to an ordinary ring R yields topological Hochschild homology, denoted THH(R). The (non-topological) Hochschild homology introduced above can be reinterpreted along these lines, by taking for C the derived category of Z-modules (as an ∞-category).

Replacing tensor products over the sphere spectrum by tensor products over Z (or the Eilenberg–MacLane-spectrum HZ) leads to a natural comparison map THH(R) → HH(R). It induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups in degrees 0, 1, and 2. In general, however, they are different, and THH tends to yield simpler groups than HH. For example,

is the polynomial ring (with x in degree 2), compared to the ring of divided powers in one variable.

Hesselholt (2016) showed that the Hasse-Weil zeta-function of a smooth proper variety over Fp can be expressed using regularized determinants involving topological Hochschild homology.

gollark: That is correct. Probably.
gollark: solution: illegalize not halting
gollark: Some other nontrivial machines will also *always* halt.
gollark: Which means it does not apply as generally as you claimed.
gollark: A `return True` machine does absolutely no computation and returns yes/true/1/whatever.

See also

References

  • Cartan, Henri; Eilenberg, Samuel (1956), Homological algebra, Princeton Mathematical Series, 19, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-04991-5, MR 0077480
  • Govorov, V.E.; Mikhalev, A.V. (2001) [1994], "Cohomology of algebras", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
  • Hesselholt, Lars (2016), Topological Hochschild homology and the Hasse-Weil zeta function, arXiv:1602.01980, Bibcode:2016arXiv160201980H
  • Hochschild, G. (1945), "On the cohomology groups of an associative algebra", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 46: 58–67, doi:10.2307/1969145, ISSN 0003-486X, JSTOR 1969145, MR 0011076
  • Jean-Louis Loday, Cyclic Homology, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften Vol. 301, Springer (1998) ISBN 3-540-63074-0
  • Richard S. Pierce, Associative Algebras, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (88), Springer, 1982.
  • Teimuraz Pirashvili, Hodge decomposition for higher order Hochschild homology
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.