Hanani–Tutte theorem

In topological graph theory, the Hanani–Tutte theorem is a result on the parity of edge crossings in a graph drawing. It states that every drawing in the plane of a non-planar graph contains a pair of independent edges (not both sharing an endpoint) that cross each other an odd number of times. Equivalently, it can be phrased as a planarity criterion: a graph is planar if and only if it has a drawing in which every pair of independent edges crosses evenly (or not at all).[1]

History

The result is named after Haim Hanani, who proved in 1934 that every drawing of the two minimal non-planar graphs K5 and K3,3 has a pair of edges with an odd number of crossings,[2] and after W. T. Tutte, who stated the full theorem explicitly in 1970.[3] A parallel development of similar ideas in algebraic topology has been credited to Egbert van Kampen, Arnold S. Shapiro, and Wu Wenjun.[4][5][6][7][8][9]

Applications

One consequence of the theorem is that testing whether a graph is planar may be formulated as solving a system of linear equations over the finite field of order two. These equations may be solved in polynomial time, but the resulting algorithms are less efficient than other known planarity tests.[1]

Generalizations

For other surfaces S than the plane, a graph can be drawn on S without crossings if and only if it can be drawn in such a way that all pairs of edges cross an even number of times; this is known as the weak Hanani–Tutte theorem for S. The strong Hanani–Tutte theorem, known for the projective plane as well as for the Euclidean plane, states that a graph can be drawn without crossings on S if and only if it can be drawn in such a way that all independent pairs of edges cross an even number of times, without regard for the number of crossings between edges that share an endpoint.[10]

The same approach, in which one shows that pairs of edges with an even number of crossings can be disregarded or eliminated in some type of graph drawing and uses this fact to set up a system of linear equations describing the existence of a drawing, has been applied to several other graph drawing problems, including upward planar drawings,[11] drawings minimizing the number of uncrossed edges,[12][13] and clustered planarity.[14]

gollark: Also, would it not make more sense to make the repo store a spec and for the proposals to be PRs?
gollark: DO NOT ADD NULL
gollark: WHY ARE YOU ADDING NULL
gollark: I should make a NAP proposal!
gollark: The two-dimensional compass model is inaccurate. Political leanings can only be represented accurately using my 6-dimensional hypercube.

References
  1. Schaefer, Marcus (2013), "Toward a theory of planarity: Hanani–Tutte and planarity variants", Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 17 (4): 367–440, doi:10.7155/jgaa.00298, MR 3094190.
  2. Chojnacki, Ch. (1934), "Über wesentlich unplättbare Kurven im dreidimensionalen Raume", Fundamenta Mathematicae, Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences, 23 (1): 135–142, doi:10.4064/fm-23-1-135-142. See in particular (1), p. 137.
  3. Tutte, W. T. (1970), "Toward a theory of crossing numbers", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, 8: 45–53, doi:10.1016/s0021-9800(70)80007-2, MR 0262110.
  4. Levow, Roy B. (1972), "On Tutte's algebraic approach to the theory of crossing numbers", Proceedings of the Third Southeastern Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory, and Computing (Florida Atlantic Univ., Boca Raton, Fla., 1972), Florida Atlantic Univ., Boca Raton, Fla., pp. 315–314, MR 0354426.
  5. Schaefer, Marcus, "Hanani–Tutte and related results", in Bárány, I.; Böröczky, K. J.; Tóth, G. F.; et al. (eds.), Geometry—Intuitive, Discrete, and Convex—A Tribute to László Fejes Tóth (PDF), Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies, Berlin: Springer
  6. van Kampen, E. R. (1933), "Komplexe in euklidischen Räumen", Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg, 9 (1): 72–78, doi:10.1007/BF02940628, MR 3069580.
  7. Wu, Wen-Tsün (1955), "On the realization of complexes in Euclidean spaces. I", Acta Mathematica Sinica, 5: 505–552, MR 0076334.
  8. Shapiro, Arnold (1957), "Obstructions to the imbedding of a complex in a Euclidean space. I. The first obstruction", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 66 (2): 256–269, doi:10.2307/1969998, JSTOR 1969998, MR 0089410.
  9. Wu, Wen Jun (1985), "On the planar imbedding of linear graphs. I", Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 5 (4): 290–302, MR 0818118. Continued in 6 (1): 23–35, 1986.
  10. Pelsmajer, Michael J.; Schaefer, Marcus; Stasi, Despina (2009), "Strong Hanani-Tutte on the projective plane", SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 23 (3): 1317–1323, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.217.7182, doi:10.1137/08072485X, MR 2538654.
  11. Fulek, Radoslav; Pelsmajer, Michael J.; Schaefer, Marcus; Štefanković, Daniel (2013), "Hanani–Tutte, monotone drawings, and level-planarity", in Pach, János (ed.), Thirty essays on geometric graph theory, Springer, ISBN 978-1-4614-0110-0.
  12. Pach, János; Tóth, Géza (2000), "Which crossing number is it anyway?", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 80 (2): 225–246, doi:10.1006/jctb.2000.1978, MR 1794693.
  13. Pelsmajer, Michael J.; Schaefer, Marcus; Štefankovič, Daniel (2007), "Removing even crossings", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 97 (4): 489–500, doi:10.1016/j.jctb.2006.08.001, MR 2325793.
  14. Gutwenger, C.; Mutzel, P.; Schaefer, M., "Practical experience with Hanani–Tutte for testing c-planarity", 2014 Proceedings of the Sixteenth Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX), pp. 86–97, doi:10.1137/1.9781611973198.9.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.