Habrophora

Habrophora is a genus of leaf beetles in the subfamily Eumolpinae. It is distributed in Central America, South America, and the West Indies.[1] It is placed in the tribe Habrophorini with the related genus Psathyrocerus.[2]

Habrophora
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Coleoptera
Family: Chrysomelidae
Subfamily: Eumolpinae
Tribe: Habrophorini
Genus: Habrophora
Erichson, 1847
Type species
Habrophora lateralis
Erichson, 1847

Species
  • Habrophora altimontana Bechyné, 1951
  • Habrophora amazona Weise, 1921
  • Habrophora annulicornis (Pic, 1923)
  • Habrophora colorata Bechyné & Bechyné, 1961[3]
  • Habrophora costulata Lefèvre, 1885[4]
  • Habrophora elongata Bechyné, 1951
  • Habrophora fenestrata Bechyné, 1951
  • Habrophora fuscoornata (Clark, 1866)[5]
  • Habrophora gemella Monrós, 1952[6]
  • Habrophora gounellei (Pic, 1923)
  • Habrophora lateralis Erichson, 1847
  • Habrophora lineigera Bechyné, 1958[7]
  • Habrophora lineolata (Pic, 1923)
  • Habrophora maculipennis Jacoby, 1882
  • Habrophora maculosa (Pic, 1923)
  • Habrophora montana Jacoby, 1893
  • Habrophora mutila Monrós, 1952[6]
  • Habrophora notaticeps (Pic, 1923)
  • Habrophora ornata Monrós, 1952[6]
  • Habrophora picturata Monrós, 1952[6]
  • Habrophora robusta (Pic, 1923)
  • Habrophora simplex Monrós, 1952[6]
  • Habrophora thelmae Blake, 1968[8]
  • Habrophora tibialis Lefèvre, 1878
  • Habrophora varia Erichson, 1847
  • Habrophora viridicollis Jacoby, 1891
  • Habrophora wittmeri Bechyné, 1953[1]
gollark: Because.
gollark: Your introduction would be easier to read if I didn't have to spend nonzero amounts of brain on error correction. In any case, you clearly don't have that much power if it's significant for you. It is also underspecified and somewhat incoherent, so fix that.
gollark: Surely your ultimate cosmic powers should at least extend to spelling power correctly. I mean, I can do that, and I'm not a god at least 83% of the time.
gollark: Greetings, "le bunker de corona" members. I am gollark, otherwise known as osmarks, a human. As someone who is totally a human, I exist, and do human things such as (not limited to): consuming food; consuming water; sleeping; not sleeping; sitting in chairs; motion; social interaction; thought.I enjoy things such as authorship of highly accursed code in a wide range of programming languages, computational gaming, reading scifi/fantasy, and sometimes (when I am not horribly distracted) reading about various maths topics.If you are reading this, it is already too late.Feel free to DM me iff Riemann hypothesis!I have harvested some insightful quotes:“You know what they say, speak softly but carry a tungsten slug accelerated to a measurable fraction of C.” “I mean, we could use it to destroy the Universe, but we'd have to add a lot of antimatter. Which pretty much goes for all other matter.”“The laws of Australia prevail in Australia, I can assure you of that. The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.”"World domination is such an ugly phrase. I prefer to call it world optimisation."“The Earth is built to last. It is a 4,550,000,000-year-old, 5,973,600,000,000,000,000,000-tonne ball of iron. It has taken more devastating asteroid hits in its lifetime than you've had hot dinners, and lo, it still orbits merrily. So my first piece of advice to you, dear would-be Earth-destroyer, is: do NOT think this will be easy.”“Eventually all the people who hate this kind of thing are going to be dead, and the ones who use it are going to be in control.” - a linguist“All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of indirection.” “Ignorance of insecurity does not get you security.” “I don't always believe in things, but when I do, I believe in them alphabetically.” “If you're trying to stop me, I outnumber you 1 to 6.”
gollark: Does it? I thought you only needed to look after and before a bit up to a digit which would require carrying. Or something like that.

References
  1. Bechyné, J. (1953). "Katalog der neotropischen Eumolpiden (Col. Phytoph. Chrysomeloidea)". Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey (in German). 4: 26–303.
  2. Bechyné, J.; Springlová de Bechyné, B. (1969). "La posición sistemática de Megascelis Chevrolat (Col. Phytophaga)" (PDF). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (Maracay). 3: 65–76.
  3. Bechyné, J.; Springlovà de Bechyné, B. (1961). "Notas sobre Chrysomeloidea neotropicais" (PDF). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi N.S. 33: 1–49.
  4. Lefèvre, É. (1885). "Eumolpidarum hucusque cognitarum catalogus, sectionum conspectu systematico, generum sicut et specierum nonnullarum novarum descriptionibus adjunctis". Mémoires de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège. 2. 11 (16): 1–172.
  5. Bechyné, J.; Springlová de Bechyné, B. (1969). "Notas sobre Phytophaga americanos (Coleoptera)" (PDF). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (Maracay). 3: 5–64.
  6. Monrós, F. (1952). "Notas sobre algunas Eumolpinae neotropicales (Coleóptera Chrysomelidae)" (PDF). Revista Chilena de Entomología. 2: 187–196.
  7. Bechyné, J. (1958). "Notizen zu den neotropischen Chrysomeloidea (Col. Phytophaga)". Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey Tutzing Bei München. 9: 478–706.
  8. Blake, D. H. (1968). "Ten new chrysomelid beetles from Dominica and Jamaica". Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. 70 (1): 60–67.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.