HMS Woolwich (1675)

HMS Woolwich was a 54-gun fourth rate ship of the line of the Royal Navy, built by Phineas Pett III at Woolwich Dockyard and launched in 1675.[1] She underwent a rebuild in 1702.[1]

For other ships with the same name, see HMS Woolwich.

HMS Woolwich, c.1677 (oil painting by Willem van de Velde, the Elder).
History
Great Britain
Name: HMS Woolwich
Builder: Phineas Pett III, Woolwich Dockyard
Launched: 1675
General characteristics as built[1]
Class and type: 54-gun fourth rate ship of the line
Tons burthen: 761 tons (773.2 tonnes)
Length: 112 ft (34 m) (keel)
Beam: 35 ft 9 in (10.90 m)
Depth of hold: 15 ft (4.6 m)
Propulsion: Sails
Sail plan: Full rigged ship
Armament: 54 guns of various weights of shot
General characteristics after 1702 rebuild
Propulsion: Sails
Sail plan: Full rigged ship
General characteristics after 1741 rebuild[2]
Class and type: 1733 proposals 50-gun fourth rate ship of the line
Tons burthen: 866 tons (879.9 tonnes)
Length: 134 ft (41 m) (gundeck)
Beam: 38 ft 6 in (11.73 m)
Depth of hold: 15 ft 9 in (4.80 m)
Propulsion: Sails
Sail plan: Full rigged ship
Armament:
  • 50 guns:
  • Gundeck: 22 × 18 pdrs
  • Upper gundeck: 22 × 9 pdrs
  • Quarterdeck: 4 × 6 pdrs
  • Forecastle: 2 × 6 pdrs

In 1705, when Thomas Ekines was in command, she was involved in the seizure of a Dutch ship which Ekines claimed was trading with Britains enemies of the War of the Spanish Succession. Although Ekines right to seize the ship was upheld, his further seizure of the bulk of the cargo for his personal gain caused major problems for his ongoing naval career.[3]


On 10 June 1736 she was ordered to be taken to pieces at Deptford Dockyard, and rebuilt to the lines of a 50-gun fourth rate according to the 1733 proposals of the 1719 Establishment. She was relaunched on 6 April 1741.[2]

Woolwich was broken up in 1747.[2]

Notes
  1. Lavery, Ships of the Line, vol. 1, p. 161.
  2. Lavery, Ships of the Line, vol. 1, p. 171.
  3. "1119 August 3 Admiralty Office". Calendar of State Papers 1705-1706 (1119, 3 August 1705): 194. 1705.
gollark: But it still seems like a big price delta given that, like you said, they have ridiculous economies of scale.
gollark: I have an old tower server which costs maybe £5/month to run, which provides ~4x the CPU/RAM and ~10x the disk I'd get from a cloud provider at similar pricing, plus I could install a spare GPU when I wanted that. This is a very extreme case since I am entirely ignoring my time costs on managing it and don't have as much redundancy as them.(Edit: also terrible internet connectivity, and colocation would be expensive)
gollark: Possibly also that you can hire fewer sysadmins? But I'm not sure they're that expensive if you have a lot of developers anyway.
gollark: I think the argument for cloud is mostly that it's much faster to scale than "have a bunch of servers in your office", but it seems like you pay an insane amount for that.
gollark: Most of them have tons of managed services plus quick to deploy VMs.

References
  • Lavery, Brian (2003) The Ship of the Line - Volume 1: The development of the battlefleet 1650-1850. Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-85177-252-8.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.