Gvidas Sabeckis
Gvidas Sabeckis (born March 27, 1984) is a Lithuanian professional tennis player. He was number one Lithuanian in ATP ranking for 144 weeks and a member of Lithuania Davis Cup team for eight years.
Lithuanian President Cup 2012 | |
Country (sports) | |
---|---|
Residence | Kaunas, Lithuania |
Born | Prienai, Lithuanian SSR | March 27, 1984
Height | 181 m (594 ft) |
Plays | Right-handed (two-handed backhand) |
Prize money | $25,216 |
Singles | |
Career record | 0–2 |
Highest ranking | 488 (November 17, 2008) |
Current ranking | 1467 (May 13, 2013) |
Doubles | |
Career record | 0–1 |
Highest ranking | 548 (October 6, 2008) |
Current ranking | 1484 (May 13, 2013) |
ITF Men's Circuit career finals
|
|
Singles
Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Runner-up | August 6, 2006 | Clay | 1–6, 2–6 | ||
Runner-up | August 12, 2007 | Clay | 4–6, 3–6 | ||
Runner-up | November 18, 2007 | Clay | 5–7, 3–6 | ||
Runner-up | September 14, 2008 | Clay | 6–7(2–7), 4–6 | ||
Runner-up | September 21, 2008 | Clay | 3–6, 0–6 | ||
Runner-up | September 28, 2008 | Clay | 3–6, 7–6(7–2), 3–6 |
Doubles
Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Partner | Opponents | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Runner-up | July 22, 2007 | Clay | 3–6, 4–6 | |||
Winner | November 18, 2007 | Clay | 7–6(9–7), 6–4 | |||
Winner | November 25, 2007 | Clay | 6–1, 6–4 | |||
Runner-up | December 2, 2007 | Clay | 0–6, 4–6 | |||
Runner-up | May 18, 2008 | Clay | 5–7, 2–6 | |||
Winner | September 21, 2008 | Clay | 7–6(7–2), 6–3 |
Davis Cup
Sabeckis was a member of the Lithuania Davis Cup team, he has an 11–7 record in singles and a 12–14 record in doubles in 31 ties played. Also, he partnering Daniel Lencina-Ribes is the best doubles team that ever represented Lithuania, together they have a 6–4 record.[1]
gollark: A 17x17 grid is small enough that you can probably get away with inefficiency, ubq.
gollark: I see.
gollark: Oops too many newlines.
gollark: Quoted from my notes:The relevant factors for course choice are probably something like this, vaguely in order: “personal fit” - how much I'll actually like it. This is quite hard to tell in advance. During the Y11 careers interview I was recommended some kind of trial thing for engineering, but I doubt that's on now, like many other things. Probably more important than other things, as I'd spend 3-5 years on said course, will perform better if I do enjoy it, and will probably not get much use out of studying a subject I would not like enough to do work related to. flexibility/generality - what options are opened by studying this stuff? Especially important in a changing and unpredictable world. how hard a subject is to learn out of university - relates to necessity of feedback from people who know it much better, specialized equipment needed, availability of good teaching resources, etc. Likely to decline over time due to the internet/modern information exchange systems and advancing technology making relevant equipment cheaper. earning potential - how much money does studying this bring? I don't think this is massively significant, it's probably outweighed by other things quite rapidly, but something to consider. Apparently high for quantitative and applied subjects. entry requirements - how likely I am to be able to study it. There are some things I probably cannot do at all now, such as medicine, but I didn't and don't really care about those, and there shouldn't be many. Most of the high-requirement stuff is seemingly available with more practical ones at less prestigious universities, which is probably fine.
gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/759121895022002206Well, yes, somewhat, BUT! There are other considerations™.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.