Guns for Hire (film)
Guns for Hire is a 1932 American western film directed by Lewis D. Collins and starring Lane Chandler, Sally Darling and Neal Hart.[1]
Guns for Hire | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Directed by | Lewis D. Collins |
Produced by | Willis Kent |
Written by | Oliver Drake E.B. Mann |
Starring | Lane Chandler Sally Darling Neal Hart |
Cinematography | James Diamond |
Edited by | S. Roy Luby |
Production company | Willis Kent Productions |
Distributed by | Hollywood Film Exchange |
Release date | September 1, 1932 |
Running time | 58 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
Cast
- Lane Chandler as Flip LaRue - aka Ken Wayne
- Sally Darling as Sue Thornton
- Neal Hart as Whispering Carlyle
- Yakima Canutt as Sheriff Pete Peterson
- John Ince as Matt Thornton
- Slim Whitaker as Hank Moran
- Jack Rockwell as Monk Weaver
- Ben Corbett as Fatso Gans
- Steve Clemente as Flash Gomez - aka Gunnison
- Bill Patton as Joe Patron
- Hank Bell as Duke Monahan
- John McGuire as Jim Thornton
- Frances Morris as Polly Clark
- Nelson McDowell as Inquest Official
- John Bacon as Frank Lloyd
- Ed Porter as Dr. Peter Bartlett
gollark: Am I better at resisting peer pressure than other people: well, I'd *like* to think so, but so would probably everyone else ever.
gollark: Anyway, I have, I think, reasonably strong "no genocide" ethics. But I don't know if, in a situation where everyone seemed implicitly/explicitly okay with helping with genocides, and where I feared that I would be punished if I either didn't help in some way or didn't appear supportive of helping, I would actually stick to this, since I don't think I've ever been in an environment with those sorts of pressures.
gollark: Maybe I should try arbitrarily increasing the confusion via recursion.
gollark: If people are randomly assigned (after initial mental development and such) to an environment where they're much more likely to do bad things, and one where they aren't, then it seems unreasonable to call people who are otherwise the same worse from being in the likely-to-do-bad-things environment.I suppose you could argue that how "good" you are is more about the change in probability between environments/the probability of a given real world environment being one which causes you to do bad things. But we can't check those with current technology.
gollark: I think you can think about it from a "veil of ignorance" angle too.
References
- Pitts p.206-7
Bibliography
- Michael R. Pitts. Poverty Row Studios, 1929–1940: An Illustrated History of 55 Independent Film Companies, with a Filmography for Each. McFarland & Company, 2005.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.