Greywell Tunnel

Greywell Tunnel is a 0.4-hectare (0.99-acre) biological Site of Special Scientific Interest near Greywell in Hampshire.[1][2]

Greywell Tunnel
Site of Special Scientific Interest
The eastern portal of the tunnel
Area of SearchHampshire
Grid referenceSU 713 516[1]
InterestBiological
Area0.4 hectares (0.99 acres)[1]
Notification1985[1]
Location mapMagic Map
Greywell Tunnel
Inside the Greywell Tunnel
Overview
LocationGreywell
Coordinates51.2605°N 0.978849°W / 51.2605; -0.978849
OS grid referenceSU713517
StatusDisused (collapsed)
WaterwayBasingstoke Canal
Operation
Constructedbrick
Opened1794
Closed1932
Technical
Length1,230 yards (1,120 m)
Towpathno
Boat-passableno

History

The Basingstoke Canal was authorised by an Act of Parliament obtained in 1778. The company was authorised to raise £86,000 by issuing shares, and an additional £40,000 if required. The route was around 44 miles (71 km) long, running from Basingstoke to the Wey and Godalming Navigations near Weybridge, with a large loop running to the north to pass around Greywell Hill. The loop cut through the grounds of Tylney Hall, owned by Earl Tylney, and he objected to the route. At the time, the American Revolutionary War was in progress, and no construction took place for some time. Finally, a favourable forecast of expected traffic was published in 1787, and the committee took action. A survey was made by William Jessop, who was appointed as engineer, and the contract for construction was awarded to John Pinkerton, part of a family of contractors who often worked with Jessop, in August 1788.[3][4]

The route was changed, with the large contour-following route which had been surveyed around Greywell Hill being replaced by a tunnel through it, cutting nearly 7 miles (11 km) from the length of the canal.[5] Construction started in October 1788, although Pinkerton was not initially responsible for the tunnel, the contract for which was awarded to Charles Jones. Jones had been dismissed by the Thames and Severn Canal company in 1788, after failing to complete the Sapperton Tunnel project. In his defence, he had been asked to build it bigger than originally specified and line it with bricks at no extra cost. He worked on Greywell Tunnel, but was again dismissed in 1789. Pinkerton had complained constantly about him.[6] It is not clear whether Pinkerton supervised the cutting of the tunnel, but in 1789 the company sacked its brickmaker, and in 1790 required Pinkerton to ensure that the quality of the brick was adequate for the tunnel work. 223 yards (204 m) of tunnel had been completed by June 1791, and by November 1792 a similar distance was left to be completed.[4]

The canal was opened on 4 September 1794, but two sections of the bank collapsed shortly afterwards, and parts of it were closed until the summer of 1795. The quality of the work on the tunnel was also criticised.[7][8] The tunnel had no towpath so boats had to be taken through by legging, taking up to six hours to pass through the tunnel.[9]

The gated and locked western end of the tunnel, in late 2013. The former portal and a short section of the tunnel has collapsed into the canal and become overgrown.

Trade on the canal was never as intensive as had been predicted, and several companies attempted to run it, but each ended up bankrupt.[10] The last successful passage through the tunnel was probably in 1914 by the barge Basingstoke owned by Mr A J Harmsworth, carrying sand.[11] The intention of this trip was to prove, at the request of the then owner of the canal, that it was still navigable and so avoid the possibility of closure under the Railway and Canal Traffic Act 1854. Harmsworth, the last trader working on the canal, bought the canal in 1923, but only the lower section up to Woking was used. The tunnel was finally closed when part of the roof collapsed in 1932, after which the canal to the west, including Basingstoke Wharf, was sold.[12] It was still possible for canoeists to get through the tunnel until the late 1950s, but the blockage is now total.[9]

SSSI

The tunnel is of interest for its bat populations: it has more roosting bats than any other site in Britain. The species involved are Natterer's bat (Myotis nattereri), Daubenton's bat (Myotis daubentoni), the whiskered bat (Myotis mystacinus), Brandt's bat (Myotis brandti) and the brown long-eared bat (Plecotus auritus). The tunnel consists of 880 yards (800 m) at the eastern end, which has been cut through chalk, and 153 yards (140 m) at the western end, with 197 yards (180 m) in between, where the bore has filled with soft clay as a result of the collapse. It was first studied for its bat populations in 1975, and was listed as an SSSI in December 1985, after a partial count of the population revealed 541 bats in the first 400 feet (120 m) of the eastern end, from which total numbers were estimated to be around 2,000 animals. The blockage, combined with several springs in the tunnel, creates an ideal micro-climate for the bats, which is maintained at around 10 °C (50 °F) all year. When the temperature outside the tunnel is colder than this, cold air flows into the bottom of the tunnel where it is warmed by the water, and warmer air flows out along the top of the tunnel. During the summer the air flow is reversed, with warm air flowing into the top of the tunnel and being cooled as it flows back out over the water.[13] By 2006, there were some 12,500 bats roosting in the tunnel, which included the largest known colony of Natterer's bat.[14]

Bibliography

  • Hadfield, Charles (1969). The Canals of South and South East England. David and Charles. ISBN 0-7153-4693-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Nicholson (2006). Nicholson Guides Vol 7: River Thames and the Southern Waterways. Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-00-721115-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Skempton, Sir Alec; et al. (2002). A Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers in Great Britain and Ireland: Vol 1: 1500 to 1830. Thomas Telford. ISBN 0-7277-2939-X.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
gollark: I am on my phone. I woke up 10 minutes ago.
gollark: No.
gollark: <@309787486278909952> The server was shut down temporarily.
gollark: Apiowhat?
gollark: A square wave is apparently in some confusing way equivalent to the sum of an infinite number of sine waves, so you get horrible interference, and it's low-power so the range is terrible.

References

  1. "Designated Sites View: Greywell Tunnel". Sites of Special Scientific Interest. Natural England. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
  2. "Map of Greywell Tunnel". Sites of Special Scientific Interest. Natural England. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
  3. Hadfield 1969, pp. 151–152
  4. "Surrey & Hampshire Canal Society — Engineering Aspects — The Greywell Tunnel". Retrieved 19 July 2010.
  5. Hadfield 1969, p. 152
  6. Skempton 2002, pp. 378–379
  7. Hadfield 1969, p. 153
  8. Skempton 2002, p. 528
  9. Basingstoke Canal Authority, towpath information boards
  10. Hadfield 1969, pp. 156–157
  11. "Basingstoke Canal Society - The Last Attempt to get to Basingstoke". Retrieved 6 February 2014.
  12. Hadfield 1969, p. 158
  13. "SSSI Citation for Greywell Tunnel" (PDF). English Nature. Retrieved 1 March 2012.
  14. Nicholson 2006, p. 22
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.