Gmina Dębno, Lesser Poland Voivodeship
Gmina Dębno is a rural gmina (administrative district) in Brzesko County, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, in southern Poland. Its seat is the village of Dębno, which lies approximately 8 kilometres (5 mi) east of Brzesko and 57 km (35 mi) east of the regional capital Kraków.
Gmina Dębno Dębno Commune | |
|---|---|
_flag.png) Flag _COA.png) Coat of arms | |
| Coordinates (Dębno): 49°57′7″N 20°42′50″E | |
| Country |  |
| Voivodeship | Lesser Poland |
| County | Brzesko |
| Seat | Dębno |
| Area | |
| • Total | 81.51 km2 (31.47 sq mi) |
| Population (2006) | |
| • Total | 13,965 |
| • Density | 170/km2 (440/sq mi) |
| Website | http://www.gminadebno.pl/ |
The gmina covers an area of 81.51 square kilometres (31.5 sq mi), and as of 2006 its total population is 13,965.
Villages
Gmina Dębno contains the villages and settlements of Biadoliny Szlacheckie, Dębno, Doły, Jastew, Jaworsko, Łoniowa, Łysa Góra, Maszkienice, Niedźwiedza, Perła, Porąbka Uszewska, Sufczyn and Wola Dębińska.
Neighbouring gminas
Gmina Dębno is bordered by the gminas of Borzęcin, Brzesko, Czchów, Gnojnik, Wojnicz and Zakliczyn.
gollark: Which I suppose can make some sense if you assume that it's "rational" in that people... like surprises, or something, but...
gollark: People *play the lottery*, too.
gollark: People somehow can't accept positive-sum games.
gollark: > A core proposition in economics is that voluntary exchanges benefit both parties. We show that people often deny the mutually beneficial nature of exchange, instead espousing the belief that one or both parties fail to benefit from the exchange. Across 4 studies (and 7 further studies in the Supplementary Materials), participants read about simple exchanges of goods and services, judging whether each party to the transaction was better off or worse off afterwards. These studies revealed that win–win denial is pervasive, with buyers consistently seen as less likely to benefit from transactions than sellers. Several potential psychological mechanisms underlying win–win denial are considered, with the most important influences being mercantilist theories of value (confusing wealth for money) and naïve realism (failing to observe that people do not arbitrarily enter exchanges). We argue that these results have widespread implications for politics and society.
gollark: (linking because I happened to read it recently)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.