Gleaner-class gunboat

The Gleaner (or Pelter)-class gunboat was a class of six gunboats built for the Royal Navy in 1854 for use in the Crimean War.[1]

Class overview
Name: Gleaner class
Operators:  Royal Navy
Succeeded by: Dapper class
Built: 1854
In commission: 1854 – 1864
Completed: 6
General characteristics [1]
Type: 'Crimean' gunboat
Tons burthen: 215 5394 tons bm
Length:
  • 100 ft (30 m) (gundeck)
  • 86 ft 4 in (26.31 m) (keel)
Beam: 22 ft 0 in (6.71 m)
Draught: 7 ft 10 in (2.39 m)
Installed power:
Propulsion:
  • 2-cylinder horizontal single expansion steam engine
  • Single screw
Speed: 7.5 kn (13.9 km/h)
Crew: 36
Armament:

Design

The Gleaner class was designed by W.H. Walker (who also designed the subsequent Dapper and Albacore classes). The ships were wooden-hulled, with steam power as well as sails, but of shallow draught for coastal bombardment in the shallow waters of the Baltic and Black Sea during the Crimean War.[1]

Propulsion

Two-cylinder horizontal single-expansion steam engines built by John Penn and Sons, with two boilers, provided 60 nominal horsepower through a single screw, sufficient for 7.5 knots (13.9 km/h; 8.6 mph).[1]

Armament

Ships of the class were armed with one 68-pounder smooth bore muzzle loading cannon (SBML), one 32-pounder SBML (originally two 68-pounder SBMLs were planned but the forward gun was substituted by a 32-pounder) and two 24-pounder howitzers.[1]

Ships

NameShip builder[1]Launched[1]Fate[1]
PelterW & H Pitcher, Northfleet28 August 1854Sold for breaking January 1864, breaking up completed by Tolpult on 1 February 1864
PincherW & H Pitcher, Northfleet5 September 1854Breaking completed on 17 February 1864
BadgerW & H Pitcher, Northfleet23 September 1854Broken up at Portsmouth in June 1864
SnapperW & H Pitcher, Northfleet4 October 1854Became a coal hulk in 1865, sold in 1906
GleanerDeptford Dockyard7 October 1854Sold at Montevideo in April 1868
RubyDeptford Dockyard7 October 1854Broken up October 1868
gollark: Maybe.
gollark: That won't technically operate *forever* without harvesting more stuff.
gollark: Firstly, technological progress allows more efficient use of the existing limited resources.Secondly, technological progress allows more efficient extraction of more, as well as access to more in e.g. sspæceë.Thirdly, unless perfect recycling exists somehow, I don't think there's an actual alternative beyond slowly scaling down humanity and dying out or something. Or maybe regressing living standards.
gollark: I do find the "finite resources exist so arbitrary growth isn't possible" argument quite bee for various reasons however.
gollark: Sure, I guess. It isn't very actionable either way.

References

  • Colledge, J. J.; Warlow, Ben (2006) [1969]. Ships of the Royal Navy: The Complete Record of all Fighting Ships of the Royal Navy (Rev. ed.). London: Chatham Publishing. ISBN 978-1-86176-281-8.
  • Winfield, R.; Lyon, D. (2004). The Sail and Steam Navy List: All the Ships of the Royal Navy 1815–1889. London: Chatham Publishing. ISBN 978-1-86176-032-6.
  1. Winfield, p.223
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.