George de la Warr

George Walter de la Warr (19 August 1904 – 31 March 1969) was born in the Northern England, and in later life became a civil engineer in the pay of Oxfordshire County Council. In 1953 he resigned from this post to work on within the discredited field of radionics, in which he was a pioneer. His devices were denounced by medical experts.[1][2]

Career

Warr was influenced by the devices of Albert Abrams.[1] He claimed to have invented a camera that could detect and cure diseases by remote control.[3] In June 1960, he was sued in the High Court by Catherine Phillips, a disgruntled former customer who said that her health had been ruined by using the Delawarr Diagnostic Instrument.[4] In particular, she said that the box could not possibly have the benefits that de la Warr claimed for it.[5] Warr said that his device operated above the physical plane, and the box was only used as a focus for thought.[6] After ten days of argument, the judge eventually found for de la Warr, but considered the box to be bogus.[7]

He founded the De La Warr Laboratories in Oxford where he did his research and built many radionic devices. The De La Warr Laboratories closed in 1987. Most of the radionic artifacts have unknown whereabouts. However, the radionic camera was given to Marcel J. Vogel, Psychic Research Inc. in San Jose, California. Vogel and Dan Willis did extensive tests and trials with the camera. Vogel died in 1992. The whereabouts of the camera since then is unknown.

Leslie Weatherhead who had known Warr, had supported his devices.[8]

Criticism

Warr's radionic devices have been criticized by health experts as quackery.[1][2] Warr was also notable for making unproven claims such using a photograph of insecticide on his machine to kill pests in a field miles away.[9]

Patents
  • French patent number 1,084,318 – "Perfectionnements à la recherche d'une radiation fondamentale"
  • UK patent number 741,651 – "Therapeutic apparatus"
  • UK patent number 761,976 – "Therapeutic apparatus"

Publications
  • Experiments Relating to Increases in Crop Yield by Radionic Stimulation (1955)
  • New Worlds Beyond the Atom (1959)
gollark: > .<|endoftext|>I can't find the code.<|endoftext|>Yes, I'm working on a project, and I'll find it by my way.<|endoftext|>Hmm, that seems plausible.<|endoftext|>I just got a really good idea.<|endoftext|>Oh, I'll add that.<|endoftext|>And I have a bunch of ideas for *the* good reason, and I have some vague idea how to do some of this.<|endoftext|>I have a *unique* idea from the future, I think.<|endoftext|>I have *no idea what you mean.<|endoftext|>It can also be done with an extension to the ability.<|endoftext|>If they had a selfbots, you could just be able to pick and pick them, but it would be difficult to find that.<|endoftext|>That would be bad.<|endoftext|>I've managed to find some other way to find some sort of way to do programming languages. This is very boring.<|endoftext|>They're not a really complex language with some extra steps.
gollark: GTech™ calls them "palaiologistic neural networks" but it's a bit long.
gollark: Really? Fascinating. I might have to edit the policy and harvest this.
gollark: Unless your statistics are political/religious/sociological opinions, biometric data, more than 3% of users’ genetic code or epigenetic information, weather information, current temperatures, health data, infectious memes, trade union membership status, Microsoft Windows™ usage, the Unicode character λ, Adobe Flash Player™ settings, browser history, or age.
gollark: The PotatOS Privacy Policy doesn't have anything on Discord data statistics. They aren't under the "data we don't collect" bit.

References
  1. Williams, William F. (2000). Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy. Facts on File Inc. p. 37. ISBN 1-57958-207-9
  2. "Radionics". The Skeptic's Dictionary.
  3. The Times, 9 June 1960, p8
  4. The Times, 21 June 1960, p5
  5. The Times, 23 June 1960, p16
  6. The Times, 24 June 1960, p6
  7. Spence, Lewis; Fodor, Nandor. (1991). Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology. Gale Research. p. 187. "One woman sued the De la Warr laboratories because she was unable to obtain satisfactory results. The case was dismissed on the grounds that there had been no intent to defraud, although the judge severely criticized the apparatus as bogus."
  8. Travell, John. (1999). Doctor of Souls: A Biography of Dr. Leslie Dixon Weatherhead 1893–1976. Lutterworth Press. pp. 239–240. ISBN 978-0718829919
  9. Swan, Jonathan. (2003). Quack Magic: The Dubious History of Health Fads and Cures. Ebury Press. p. 188. ISBN 978-0091888091

Further reading
  • Wallace Sampson, Lewis Vaughn. (2000). Science Meets Alternative Medicine: What the Evidence Says about Unconventional Treatments. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-803-8
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.