Fuel fraction

In aerospace engineering, an aircraft's fuel fraction, fuel weight fraction,[1] or a spacecraft's propellant fraction, is the weight of the fuel or propellant divided by the gross take-off weight of the craft (including propellant):[2]

With a fuel fraction of nearly 85%, the GlobalFlyer could carry 5 times its weight in fuel.

The fractional result of this mathematical division is often expressed as a percent. For aircraft with external drop tanks, the term internal fuel fraction is used to exclude the weight of external tanks and fuel.

Fuel fraction is a key parameter in determining an aircraft's range, the distance it can fly without refueling. Breguet’s aircraft range equation describes the relationship of range with airspeed, lift-to-drag ratio, specific fuel consumption, and the part of the total fuel fraction available for cruise, also known as the cruise fuel fraction, or cruise fuel weight fraction.[3]

Fighter aircraft

At today’s state of the art for jet fighter aircraft, fuel fractions of 29 percent and below typically yield subcruisers; 33 percent provides a quasi–supercruiser; and 35 percent and above are needed for useful supercruising missions. The U.S. F-22 Raptor’s fuel fraction is 29 percent,[4] Eurofighter is 31 percent, both similar to those of the subcruising F-4 Phantom II, F-15 Eagle and the Russian Mikoyan MiG-29 "Fulcrum". The Russian supersonic interceptor, the Mikoyan MiG-31 "Foxhound", has a fuel fraction of over 45 percent.[5] The Panavia Tornado had a relatively low internal fuel fraction of 26 percent, and frequently carried drop tanks.[6]

Airliners

Airliners have a fuel fraction of less than half their takeoff weight, between 26% for medium-haul to 45% for long-haul:

ModelMTOW (t)OEW (t)OEW
Fraction
Fuel
capacity (t)
Fuel
fraction
Payload
Max. (t)
Payload
fraction
Airbus A380[7]575 28549.6% 25444.2% 8414.6%
Boeing 777-300ER[8]351.5 167.847.7% 145.541.4% 69.919.9%
Boeing 777-200LR[8]347.5 145.241.8% 145.541.9% 64.018.4%
Airbus A350-1000[9]308 15650.6% 122.539.8% 6420.8%
Airbus A350-900[9]280 142.751% 108.338.7% 5318.9%
Boeing 787-9[10]254 128.950.7% 101.540% 52.620.7%
Airbus A330-300[11]242 13053.7% 109.245.1% 4518.6%
Airbus A330-200[11]242 12150% 109.245.1% 4920.2%
Boeing 787-8[10]227.9 12052.7% 101.344.4% 43.319%
Airbus A320ceo[12]79 44.356.1% 23.329.5% 2025.3%
Boeing 737-800[13]79 41.452.4% 20.926.5% 21.327%
Bombardier CS300[14]67.6 37.154.9% 17.225.5% 18.727.7%
Bombardier CS100[14]60.8 35.257.9% 17.629% 15.124.9%

The Concorde supersonic transport had a fuel fraction of 51%.

General aviation

The Rutan Voyager took off on its 1986 around-the-world flight at 72 percent, the highest figure ever at the time.[15] Steve Fossett's Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer could attain a fuel fraction of nearly 85 percent, meaning that it carried more than five times its empty weight in fuel.[16]

gollark: I mean, they sort of indirectly are, and at least evolved vaguely for that.
gollark: Fears are not there to protect you, fears are mostly just pretty stupid?
gollark: <@160279332454006795> cease C++ utilisation.
gollark: YET.
gollark: I think apio is Latin derived and pyro/cryo Greek.

See also

References

  1. Brandt, Steven (2004). Introduction to Aeronautics: a Design Perspective. AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics & Ast). p. 359. ISBN 1-56347-701-7.
  2. Vinh, Nguyen (1993). Flight Mechanics of High-Performance Aircraft. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 139. ISBN 0-521-47852-9.
  3. Filippone, Antonio (2006). Flight Performance of Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft. Elsevier. p. 426. ISBN 0-7506-6817-2.
  4. 8200/27900 = 0.29
  5. The F-22 Program FACT VERSUS FICTION Archived 2007-04-21 at the Wayback Machine by Everest E. Riccioni, Col. USAF, Ret.
  6. Spick, Mike (2002). Brassey's Modern Fighters. Washington: Potomac Books. pp. 51–53. ISBN 1-57488-462-X.
  7. "A380 Aircraft Characteristics – Airport and Maintenance Planning" (PDF). Airbus. December 2016.
  8. 777-200LR/-300ER/-Freighter Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning (PDF) (Technical report). Boeing. May 2015.
  9. "A350 Aircraft Characteristics – Airport and Maintenance Planning" (PDF). Airbus. November 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-28.
  10. "787 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning" (PDF). Boeing. December 2015.
  11. "A330 Aircraft Characteristics – Airport and Maintenance Planning" (PDF). Airbus. December 2016.
  12. "A320 Aircraft Characteristics – Airport and Maintenance Planning" (PDF). Airbus. June 2016.
  13. "737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning" (PDF). Boeing. September 2013.
  14. "CSeries brochure" (PDF). Bombardier. June 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-08. Retrieved 2017-10-22.
  15. Noland, David (February 2005). "Burt Rutan and the Ultimate Solo". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 2006-12-11.
  16. Schneider, Mike (2006-02-06). "Adventurer Set for Record-Setting Flight". Space.com. Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-03-18. At takeoff, fuel is expected to account for almost 85 percent of the graphite-made aircraft's weight.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.