Fraserburgh and District (ward)
Fraserburgh and District is one of the nineteen wards used to elect members of the Aberdeenshire Council. It elects four Councillors.
Councillors
Election | Councillors | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | Brian Topping (SNP) |
Ian Tait (SNP /Ind.) |
Andy Ritchie (SNP) |
Michael Watt (Ind.) | ||||
2012 | Charles Cummin Buchan (SNP) | |||||||
2017 | Doreen Mair (Ind.) |
Andy Kille (Conservative) |
Election Results
2017 Election
2017 Aberdeenshire Council election [2]
Fraserburgh and District - 4 seats | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count 1 | Count 2 | Count 3 | Count 4 | Count 5 | Count 6 | Count 7 | Count 8 | Count 9 | ||
Conservative | Andy Kille | 24.10% | 1,229 | ||||||||||
Independent | Doreen Mair | 14.57% | 743 | 781 | 790 | 873 | 950 | 1,061 | |||||
SNP | Charles Cummin Buchan (incumbent) | 12.04% | 614 | 617 | 758 | 783 | 811 | 855 | 859 | 910 | 999 | ||
SNP | Brian Topping (incumbent) | 12.78% | 652 | 653 | 709 | 731 | 763 | 776 | 780 | 827 | 968 | ||
Independent | Ian Tait (incumbent) | 9.73% | 496 | 529 | 532 | 564 | 590 | 637 | 644 | 743 | |||
Independent | Michael Watt (incumbent) | 6.45% | 329 | 352 | 359 | 397 | 429 | 470 | 478 | ||||
Liberal Democrats | Ann Bell | 5.14% | 262 | 292 | 299 | 313 | 362 | ||||||
Labour | Kenneth Watt | 5.23% | 267 | 282 | 287 | 311 | |||||||
Independent | Charlie Reid | 4.94% | 252 | 258 | 267 | ||||||||
SNP | David Donn | 5.02% | 256 | 257 | |||||||||
Electorate: TBC Valid: 5,100 Spoilt: 93 Quota: 1,021 Turnout: 42.9% |
2012 Election
2012 Aberdeenshire Council election [3]
Fraserburgh and District - 4 seats | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count 1 | Count 2 | Count 3 | Count 4 | Count 5 | Count 6 | Count 7 | Count 8 | Count 9 | ||
SNP | Brian Topping (incumbent) | 25.1 | 1,056 | ||||||||||
SNP | Charles Cummin Buchan | 16.72 | 704 | 787.7 | 792.9 | 802.1 | 817.7 | 1,040.6 | |||||
Independent | Ian Tait (incumbent) | 14.65 | 617 | 637.2 | 644.6 | 666.9 | 723.6 | 733.9 | 759.3 | 836.1 | 993.3 | ||
Independent | Michael Watt (incumbent) | 9.90 | 417 | 432.3 | 446.3 | 466.5 | 515.5 | 528.9 | 547.7 | 627.9 | 783.6 | ||
Independent | Doreen Mair | 8.81 | 371 | 379.5 | 410.5 | 436.7 | 470.9 | 483.3 | 498.3 | 625.9 | |||
Liberal Democrats | Ann Bell | 7.65 | 322 | 326.8 | 334.0 | 361.4 | 420.1 | 427.3 | 446.3 | ||||
Conservative | Bob Sim | 6.15 | 259 | 261.6 | 266.6 | 275.6 | |||||||
SNP | Ricky Sheaffe-Greene | 4.89 | 206 | 270.3 | 273.5 | 280.7 | 282.7 | ||||||
Labour | Ashara Taylor | 4.08 | 172 | 173.6 | 176.8 | ||||||||
Independent | George Esslemont | 2.07 | 87 | 88.2 | |||||||||
Electorate: 11,117 Valid: 4,211 Spoilt: 65 Quota: 843 Turnout: 4,276 (37.88%) |
2007 Election
2007 Aberdeenshire Council election
Fraserburgh and District | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count 1 | Count 2 | Count 3 | Count 4 | Count 5 | Count 6 | Count 7 | ||
SNP | Brian Topping | 27.1 | 1,487 | ||||||||
SNP | Ian Tait† | 20.6 | 1,131 | ||||||||
Independent | Michael Watt | 15.1 | 831 | 865 | 869 | 890 | 918 | 1,041 | 1,370 | ||
SNP | Andy Ritchie†††††† | 14.5 | 795 | 1,022 | 1,037 | 1,046 | 1,060 | 1,090 | 1,165 | ||
Independent | Dennis Duthie | 9.3 | 509 | 520 | 522 | 554 | 587 | 728 | |||
Conservative | Bob Sim | 8.5 | 466 | 482 | 484 | 490 | 522 | ||||
Liberal Democrats | Dominique-Paul Lonchay | 3.0 | 164 | 167 | 168 | 171 | |||||
Independent | James Milne | 2.0 | 109 | 116 | 116 | ||||||
Electorate: - Valid: 5,492 Spoilt: 168 Quota: 1,099 Turnout: 51.83% |
gollark: I don't think you can just point at that as a final answer. What is that graph even showing growth in? Why is competition not creating an incentive to get rid of useless administrators? *Is* there even much competition?
gollark: I think the point is more that it's a system which mostly works well and has produced lots of nice things.
gollark: At some point you'll have to make tradeoffs, because going for "maximize lives saved right now at all costs" is a really terrible strategy.
gollark: Strategies which minimize COVID deaths in the short run wouldn't be very good if they totally collapsed the economy after a while. Especially since this is likely to stick around for a while.
gollark: The economy *does matter*, though, even in a "lives saved" sense. As someone on the interweb put it:> Damage to productivity eventually results in damage to people, since we use part of our productivity to preserve life.
References
- http://www.lgbc-scotland.gov.uk/5th-reviews-ward-maps
- https://web.archive.org/web/20170702212518/https://www.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/elections/local-government-elections-2017/#list
- https://web.archive.org/web/20070512233641/http://www.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/elections/local/index.asp
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.