Family purpose doctrine

In common law in the United States, the family purpose doctrine is a rule that holds the owner of an automobile liable for damages to others while a member of the family is driving the vehicle, regardless of whether or not the owner gave permission. The underlying theory is that the vehicle is owned for family purposes.

Overview

In the US, this is primarily a state-level rule with considerable variation in its application. For example, in Arizona, the family purpose doctrine is applied very broadly and holds parents liable even for the negligence of a child driving a motor vehicle in defiance of driving restrictions placed upon him.[1] In Georgia, the 'family purpose' liability extends to third parties allowed by the teenage driver to operate the car. Georgia also extends the rule to adult children in some cases and explicitly extends the rule to family boats.[2]

In Colorado, on the other hand, the same term is used to describe joint and several liability for household bills.[3]

gollark: Not much, really!
gollark: That might be more of a German thing. IIRC in countries here people tend to mostly pass.
gollark: <@!330678593904443393> I would like to, very late and unprompted, suggest another problem with free university/college: that it seems to also assume that college-style education is the only way forward in life and to get jobs and stuff.
gollark: That also improves the incentive structures.
gollark: So separate the authorities certifying that you're not an idiot and the ones teaching you to not be an idiot!

References
  1. Young v. Beck, Case No. 1 CA-CV 09-0188
  2. Stuart v. Stephens, 225 Ga. 185, 166 S.E. 2d 890 (1969)
  3. http://www.douglasturner.com/2007/10/09/the-family-purpose-doctrine/


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.