Föreningen Vetenskap och Folkbildning

Vetenskap och Folkbildning (Swedish: Science and Popular Enlightenment) or The Swedish Skeptics' Association, abbreviated as VoF, is a Swedish skeptics' association. It was founded in 1982 with the purpose to raise the general public's awareness of scientific methods and results. The association publishes the quarterly journal Folkvett and organises lectures on themes related to science and pseudoscience. Since 1987 the association has annually awarded prizes for "Enlightener of the Year" and "Misleader of the Year".

Vetenskap och Folkbildning
AbbreviationVoF
Formation1982
TypeNonprofit organisation
PurposeRaise public awareness of scientific methods and results; combat inaccurate views on issues that can be resolved scientifically
HeadquartersStockholm
Region served
Sweden
Membership
2800[1]
Chairperson
Pontus Böckman[2]
Websitewww.vof.se

Activities

In 2010 the association had a membership above 2600.[3] The current chairman is Pontus Böckman (who's also a co-host of The European Skeptics Podcast and a board member of the European Council of Skeptical Organisations),[4] while Lina Hedman acts as vice-president.[5] Other prominent members are professor of philosophy Sven Ove Hansson (chairman 1982-88), professor of molecular cell biology Dan Larhammar (chairman 1998-2004) and ESA astronaut Christer Fuglesang.

VoF is part of an international network of skeptics' associations, the largest of which is the American Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI).[6] Founded six years prior to VoF, CSI served as a model for the Swedish organisation.

Criticism

People whose activities has been labeled “pseudoscience” and “deceptions” by VoF and skeptics in general, have been critical of the organisation.

In academia the association enjoys quite high esteem. Several Swedish universities offer courses utilising publications by its members.[7][8][9] Many members are scientists and teachers.

Some criticism has however also been voiced by academics. Philosopher Martin Gustafsson at the University of Stockholm argues that VoF exaggerates the threats against rationality and science, and that its representatives erroneously depict themselves as underdogs in a war on widespread superstition. He has also maintained that the Enlightenment's ideal of free thought clashes with the respect for scientific authority that VoF espouses.[10] Per-Anders Forstorp at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, suggests that VoF represents positivism and institutionalised intolerance.[11]

Sven Ove Hansson has commented on this kind of criticism:

”The way I see it, VoF and the general skeptical movement is not characterised by any particular view of science. … Just like members of Amnesty International can have different ideas about the limits of free speech, there is room in VoF for divergent opinions in questions about science and the philosophy of science. (Critics have sometimes claimed that the organisation is full of positivists. I have never come across one of those, but VoF does have supporters and opponents of Karl Poppers falsificationist theory of science among its members.)”[12]

gollark: That's not binary search, that's just encoding letters as binary.
gollark: Binary search will just get you numbers.
gollark: Not binary search, just send ASCII over the link.
gollark: Great!
gollark: It seems like you're first suggesting that believing false things can be okay if it's emotionally good, but then contradicting that?

References
  1. "Vetenskap och Folkbildning". VoF website (in Swedish). Vetenskap och Folkbildning. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  2. https://www.vof.se/riksstyrelsen/
  3. Vetenskap och Folkbildning: Hur det började
  4. "European Skeptics elect fresh leadership". ECSO.org. 26 September 2017. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
  5. "Förändringar i VoF:s styrelse". Föreningen Vetenskap och Folkbildning. 18 August 2018. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
  6. International contacts
  7. God och Dålig Vetenskap 7,5 p Archived 2010-08-27 at the Wayback Machine
  8. Vetenskap och tro, 5 poäng Archived 2007-09-28 at the Wayback Machine
  9. Biologi för Filosofer, 1 poäng Archived 2007-08-19 at the Wayback Machine
  10. Folkbildare sätter krokben för sig själva, SvD Brännpunkt, 10 dec 2007
  11. Per-Anders Forstorp, 2005, The construction of pseudo-science: Science patrolling and knowledge policing by academic prefects and weeders VEST: Journal for science and technology studies Archived 2009-08-03 at the Wayback Machine vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 17-71
  12. Sven Ove Hansson, "En rörelse av skeptiker?", i J. Jerkert och S. O. Hansson (red.), Fakta eller fantasier, Stockholm: Leopard, 2007, s. 186.

Further reading
  • Hansson, Sven Ove 1995: Vetenskap och ovetenskap : om kunskapens hantverk och fuskverk. Stockholm. Norstedts (2003). ISBN 91-7297-622-5.
  • Hansson, Sven Ove & Sandin, Per (red.) 2000: Högskolans lågvattenmärken. Stockholm. Natur & Kultur (2000). ISBN 91-27-07981-3.
  • Jerkert, Jesper (red.) 2003: Antroposofin : en kritisk granskning. Stockholm. Leopard (2003). ISBN 91-7343-046-3.
  • Jerkert, Jesper & Hansson, Sven Ove (red.) 2005: Vetenskap eller villfarelse. Stockholm. Leopard (2005). ISBN 91-7343-085-4.
  • Jerkert, Jesper (red.) 2007: Fakta eller fantasier. Stockholm. Leopard (2007). ISBN 978-91-7343-162-0.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.