Eurobalise

A Eurobalise is a specific variant of a balise being a transponder placed between the rails of a railway. These balises constitute an integral part of the European Train Control System, where they serve as "beacons" giving the exact location of a train as well as transmitting signalling information in a digital telegram to the train.

A Siemens Eurobalise in Germany

Overview

A balise typically needs no power source. In response to radio frequency energy broadcast by a Balise Transmission Module (BTM) mounted under a passing train, the balise transmits information to the train ('Uplink'). The provisions for Eurobalises to receive information from the train ('Downlink') has been removed from the specification. The transmission rate is sufficient to transmit at least 3 copies of a 'telegram' to be received by a train passing at any speed up to 500 km/h.

Balises on Orivesi-Jyväskylä railway in Muurame, Finland

Eurobalises are typically placed in pairs on two sleepers in the center of the track. For ETCS they are typically spaced 3 metres apart. With the balises being numbered the train will know whether it travels in nominal (1→2) or reverse direction (2→1). Singular balises exist only when linked to a previous balise group or when their function is reduced to provide only the exact position. There may be up to 8 balises in a balise group.

Balises are differentiated as being either a 'Fixed Data Balise' transmitting the same data to every train, or a 'Transparent Data Balise' which transmits variable data, also called a 'Switchable' or 'Controllable Balise'. (Note that the word 'fixed' refers to the information transmitted by the balise, not to its physical location. All balises are immobile).

Fixed Data Balise

A 'Fixed Data Balise', or short 'fixed balise' is programmed to transmit the same data to every train. Information transmitted by a fixed balise typically includes: the location of the balise; the geometry of the line, such as curves and gradients; and any speed restrictions. The programming is performed using a wireless programming device. Thus a fixed balise can notify a train of its exact location, and the distance to the next signal, and can warn of any speed restrictions.

Transparent Data Balise

A 'Transparent Data Balise', or short 'controllable balise' is connected to a Lineside Electronics Unit (LEU), which transmits dynamic data to the train, such as signal indications. Balises forming part of an ETCS Level 1 [1] signalling system employ this capability. The LEU integrates with the conventional (national) signal system either by connecting to the lineside railway signal or to the signalling control tower.

Euroloop

A balise transmits telegrams at a specific site. To allow a continuous transmission the telegrams may be sent along leaky feeder cable being up to 1000 metres long. The Euroloop cable is always connected with a balise at its end which serves as the End of Loop Marker (EOLM). The telegram structure is the same as for the balise it is connected to. Originally the Euroloop used the same frequency as the Eurobalises but that was changed for specification 2.0.1 in September 2004. Euroloops had been used in Switzerland which completed the change in July 2010.

Modulation

The downlink uses an amplitude modulation on the 27.095 MHz frequency. This frequency is used to power the passive balises (it is the intermediate channel 11A in CB radio).

The uplink uses frequency-shift keying with 3.951 MHz for a logical '0' and 4.516 MHz for a logical '1'. The data rate of 564.48 kBit/s is enough to transmit 3 copies of a telegram to a train passing at 500 km/h.[2]

The Euroloop frequency was moved to a centre of 13.54750 MHz (exactly half of the Eurobalise power frequency).[3]

In a practical setup the BTM requires 65 Watt to power the Eurobalises and to receive the telegrams with the BTM mounted 21 centimetres (8 1⁄4 in) above top of rail on a bogie.[4]

Encoding

Each pair of balises usually consists of a switchable balise and a fixed balise. A balise transmits a 'telegram' of either 1023 bits (93*11) or 341 bits (31*11) in the channel encoding with 11 bit per symbol. The user data block is cut into 10-bit user symbols before the scrambling and shaping operation - the effective payload of signalling information is 830 bit (83*10) for the long telegram and 210 bit (21*10) for the short telegram. The final telegram consists of

  • shaped data (913 bit or 231 bit) containing the payload (830 or 210 bit)
  • control bits (Cb, 3 bit)
  • scrambling bits (Sb, 12 bit)
  • extra shaping bits (Esb, 10 bit)
  • checksum (CheckBits, 85 bit)

The telegram is broadcast in a cyclic manner as the train passes over the balise. To avoid transmission errors the payload is scrambled (avoiding burst errors), substituted with a symbol code of different Hamming distance, and a checksum is added for validity checks. Since the checksum is computed after the symbol substitution the telegram contains extra shaping bits to allow the resulting checksum bits to be filled up in a way that only valid symbols of the chosen channel code are in the telegram where each symbol has 11 bits.

The payload data consists of a header followed by multiple packets defined in the ERTMS protocols. Typical packets are:

  • Packet 5 - Linking
  • Packet 12 - Movement Authority
  • Packet 21 - Gradient Profile
  • Packet 27 - International Static Speed Profile
  • Packet 255 - End of information

Many applications include optional packets like Packet 3 - National Values, Packet 41 - Level Transition Order, and Packet 136 - Infill Location Reference.[5] If the telegram maximum of 830 bits is reached then more packets can be sent in the following balises of the same balise group - with up to 8 balises in a balise group the maximum ERTMS message per balise group can encompass 8 * 830 = 6640 bits (note that every telegram must contain a header and the trailer packet 255).[5] A fixed balise transmits a stable message which typically can include the linking information, gradient profile, and speed profile. It may also contain track information such as route suitability data for different train types and axle load restrictions.

Almost all packet types contain a parameter flagging whether its information is relevant for the "nominal" or "reverse" direction (or both). If a train sees balise 1 before balise 2 then it passes over the group in the nominal direction. Consequently, some packets may be dropped by the application software of the receiver if they are not designated for the relevant direction. The ERTMS header block of 50 bits contains the ETCS version, the current number and total count of balises within a balise group (up to 8 balises), a flag whether it is a copy (up to 4 copies) that increases chances for the receiver to see the telegram of the balise in a group, a serial number flagging whether the message has changed lately, a 10-bit country identifier along with the 14-bit balise group identifier allowing for a unique ID of every balise group. The linking information informs about the distance to the next balise group (one linking packet per direction) and the required train reaction if the next balise group is missed (e.g. train stop). The movement authority packet defines a maximum speed that may be used for a given maximum distance and maximum time - setting the maximum speed to zero will force the train to stop. The gradient profile may have a variable length based on the contained pairs of section length (scalar and number in the metric system) and section gradient (uphill/downhill flag and a number in %). Similarly the international static speed profile is given in a variable count of section parts with each part denoting the section length (number in meters - the scale is only given once at the start of the packet for all sections), the maximum speed (number * 5 km/h - allowed numbers are 0-120 i.e. some spare values are left over) and a flag if the speed restriction applies to the front or rear end of the train (possibly allowing for a delay). The trailer packet only contains its packet id with no parameters where 255 equals the state of all bits set in the 8-bit packet id field (11111111).[5]

Manufacture

The history of ETCS has seen the formation of UNISIG (Union of Signalling Industry) in 1998 to promote the development of the system. The founding members were Alstom, Ansaldo, Bombardier, Invensys, Siemens and Thales. The group has ensured that Eurobalises may be made by several different companies; while the balises may vary in the details, they are manufactured to meet the same standards. The principal manufacturers of Eurobalises belong to a group[6] of seven firms (Alstom, Ansaldo STS, Bombardier, Invensys, Siemens, Sigma-Digitek, Thales) within the UNIFE federation of railway suppliers. This group cooperated in developing the specifications[2][7] for Eurobalises. Specifications for Eurobalises are governed by the European Railway Agency.[8]

Usage

Eurobalises are not only used in the ETCS/ERTMS train protection system. There are alternative implementations that pick up on the telegram structure to encode only some packet types and adding additional specific information. ETCS trains may decode the telegrams possibly translating them like any other Class-B signalling information. It is also possible that a balise transmits telegrams for different systems allowing for a transitional phase from one variant to another as typically used when switching from a national train protection system to ETCS.

The following automatic train protection systems are based on Eurobalises:

  • ETCS – the European-wide train protection system
  • Chinese Train Control System versions CTCS-2 and CTCS-3, used on high speed rail lines in China
  • EuroSignum – a variant of the earlier Swiss Integra-Signum train protection system
  • EuroZub – a variant of the earlier Swiss ZUB 121 train protection system
  • SCMT – an Italian train protection system
  • TBL1+ – a train protection system used in Belgium
  • GNT – the system to control tilting trains in Germany
  • ZBS – a new rapid transit control system for the S-Bahn Berlin

Eurobalises have also been used in Germany to transmit tilting instructions for curves to tilting trains while keeping the traditional train protection system. The original GNT (Geschwindigkeitsüberwachung Neigetechnik) from Siemens had used specific coupling coils in 1992 (ZUB 122) and it was switched to Eurobalises in 2005 (ZUB 262). The additional telegram packet types for tilting trains have been added to the Baseline 3 series of ETCS.

History

The direct predecessor of Eurobalises are the balises of the Ebicab train protection system. The Ebicab system was developed in Sweden (and Norway) by LMEricson and SRT. The Ebicab system was developed after a crash in Norway in 1975 (Tretten). Trial runs started in 1979, and in Norway the first line fully equipped with the system was operational in 1983. The adaptation of the Ebicab system in France is the KVB system. It had been developed after a crash in 1985 and it was deployed in the early 1990s on French lines. The name for the beacons: "balise" was however in use in the Ebicab system in the late 1970s.

About the same time the idea came up to develop a common train protection system for Europe leading to the 91/440/EEC as of 29 July 1991. Since 1993 the organizational framework was in place to publish TSI standards. This allowed for the first drafts of the new technology and since 1996 the elements were tested by six railway operators which had joined the ERTMS user group.

EBICAB balise in the Mediterranean Corridor

The Ebicab technology did already use the 27 MHz carrier frequency as well as putting the beacons in the center of the track.[9] With Ebicab a single balise transmission had only 12 bit but it allowed for 2 to 5 balises in a balise group providing 24 to 80 bit of signalling information. Most of the patents on that encoding are held by GEC Alsthom. It was then to ABB[lower-alpha 1] to extend the telegram size from 12 bit in EBICAB 700 to 180 bit in EBICAB 900 (after encoding 255 bit)[10] as used in the Mediterranean Corridor in Spain. In that time Ansaldo adopted the balise type for the digital evolution of the Italian SCMT also becoming a second supplier for the balise type to other railways. These balise types were later collectively named KER balises from their usage in KVB, Ebicab and RSDD (Ripetizione Segnali Discontinua Digitale).[2]

ZUB 123 coupling coil

Another source for the technology comes from the Siemens ZUB 100 family where they used coupling coils at the side of the tracks to augment the existing train protection system with additional signalling. The first ZUB 111 beacon did just allow for 21 states (using 2 out of 7 frequencies). The successor ZUB 122 switched to a digital telegram modulated on an 850 kHz carrier.[9] The latter was used first in the ZUB 121 for Switzerland since 1992 and ZUB 123 for Denmark since 1992. The telegram types of these systems are compatible with the ORE A46 specification for the German LZB telegrams (about 83 bits).

Siemens published a report showing the advantages of the balise technology for railway operations in 1992 and in the fall of 1995 they delivered prototypes of Siemens type S21 Eurobalise.[11] ABB, Alsthom and Ansaldo did also cooperate in the development and the S21 balise along with other Eurobalise prototypes were tested from July to October 1996 at the Velim railway test circuit and the Austrian railways test lab (Forschungs- und Prüfzentrum Arsenal).[12]

The Eurobalise FFFIS (Form Fit Function Interface Specification) was introduced to the ERMTS range of specifications as SUBSET-036. Its foreword describes the specification to be based on the results of EUROSIG consortium (ACEC Transport, Adtranz Signal,[lower-alpha 1] Alcatel SEL, GE C Alsthom Transport, Ansaldo Trasporti, CSEE Transport, SASIB Railway, Siemens, and Westinghouse Signal) that got financial support from the European Commission. The EUROSIG formed after the initial Eurobalise/Euroloop Project 92/94 leading into the actual ERTMS/EUROSIG Project 95/98 supported by the parallel EMSET Project 96/00 (testing the Eurocab specification).[2]

When the EUROSIG project had ended the ETCS was still not ready for real world application. So 1998 saw the formation of UNISIG (Union of Signalling Industry), including Alstom, Ansaldo, Siemens, Bombardier,[lower-alpha 1] Invensys and Thales which were to take over the finalisation of the standard.[13] The first baseline specification has been tested by six railways since 1999 as part of the European Rail Traffic Management System[14] The railway companies defined some extended requirements that were added to ETCS including telegram packet types for RBC-Handover and track profile information - the resulting Class 1 Version 2.0.0 specification of ETCS was then published in April 2000.

gollark: We have a Samsung TV. It seems to have a screen about 30" in size and is ancient (not CRT-ancient, but quite old).
gollark: Doesn't mean *you* should.
gollark: By which I mean both manufacturers and users.
gollark: Security is an issue too, because nobody really cares to update them.
gollark: Smart TVs tend to be buggy and unreliable, and you can't swap out the "smart" bit when something inevitably breaks or stops working or stops receiving updates or has some component stripped out because [random stupid licensing issue], and the reason they're cheap and prevalent is *monetization via data mining*.

References
  1. UNIFE (2010). "ERTMS Levels" (PDF). ERTMS Factsheets. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2011.
  2. "Specification for Eurobalises" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 March 2012.
  3. "FFFIS for Euroloop" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 March 2016.
  4. "Alstom and Italian Railway (Ferrovie dello Stato) experience with regard to the ERTMS/ETCS level 2 on Italian trial site, focusing on the train-borne aspects" (PDF). UIC. 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2016. [ Eurobalise antenna ] The whole antenna power consumption is approximately 65W and the maximum distance from the EVC, that provides the 24V power supply, should be 30m. [ External on-board installation ] both the Eurobalise antennas are installed on the bogie respectively 2.40m and 6.86m far from the free buffers. The height from the top of the rails is 0.21m [ Balises detection ] All the Eurobalises, programmed or not, along the track (from Firenze Campo di Marte to Arezzo) were detected by the on-board equipment. [ Telegram decoding ] A great number of runs were performed at different speeds and no telegram decoding errors occurred. All the Eurobalises rightly programmed have been decoded.
  5. Warren Kaiser, Stein Nielson (14 March 2008). "The Core of ATP - Data Engineering". IRSE Technical Meeting "All About ATP" Sydney. Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 21 December 2017. Free registration required to access document.
  6. https://web.archive.org/web/20150627053808/http://www.ertms.com/. Archived from the original on June 27, 2015. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. "Test Specification for Eurobalises" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 March 2016.
  8. "Technical specifications for interoperability". European Union Agency for Railways.
  9. "State of the art in train to track transmission (CROMATICA TR 1016)" (PDF). 4 July 1996.
  10. Ogunsola, Ade; Mariscotti, Andrea (2012-08-14). Electromagnetic Compatibility in Railways: Analysis and Management. ISBN 9783642302817.
  11. Ulrich Lehmann (1996). "Aktivitäten von Siemens zur Einführung der EURO-Balise S21". Signal + Draht. Tetzlaff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG. ISSN 0037-4997. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. Jens-Peter Bauer (1997). "EURO-Balise S21 von Siemens für den Fernverkehr". Signal + Draht. Tetzlaff Verlag GmbH Co. KG. ISSN 0037-4997.
  13. Warren Kaiser, Stein Nielson (14 March 2008). "The Core of ATP – Data Engineering". IRSE Technical Meeting "All About ATP" Sydney. Archived from the original on 2 May 2013.
  14. "ERTMS in 10 questions" (PDF). European Railway Agency. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2010.
  1. ABB rail was merged into Adtranz in 1996 which was sold to Bombardier in 2001, see "Bombardier Mannheim". Retrieved 2 March 2016. 1988: BBC und ASEA schließen sich zusammen zur ABB / 1996: Zusammenschluss der Bahnaktivitäten von ABB und Daimler-Benz zur Adtranz / 2001: Übernahme durch Bombardier Transportation
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.