Empoasca fabae

Empoasca fabae belongs to family Cicadellidae and genus Empoasca within order Hemiptera.[1] They are more commonly referred to as the potato leafhopper.[1] In North America they are a serious agricultural pest.[2] Every year millions of dollars are lost from reduced crop yields and on pest management.[3] Crops that are impacted the most are potatoes, clover, beans, apples and alfalfa.[4]

Empoasca fabae
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hemiptera
Family: Cicadellidae
Genus: Empoasca
Species:
E. fabae
Binomial name
Empoasca fabae
(Harris 1841)
Empoasca fabae, potato leafhopper
Empoasca fabae, potato leafhopper, Size: 3.3 mm

Appearance

Adults have pale to iridescent green bodies with 6 or 8 white spots on their pronotum.[4] They have a distinctive white H shape mark between their head and wing base.[5] Their bodies are approximately 3 mm long and have on their front wings near its tip a crossvein.[4] Adults and nymphs move by hopping among host plants.[5] However, only adults can fly.[6]

Diet

They are able to feed and reproduce on at least 200 different plant species across twenty-six families.[1] In total herb genera represent 64% of their hosts.[7] Adults prefer to feed on the leaves and stems, while the nymphs prefer the leaves.[7] Their specialized mouth parts are able to pierce into the plant tissue and remove its sap.[8] The ability to inhabit a wide range of hosts is due to the variation in their feeding behaviors.[9]

Migration

Empoasca fabae is a seasonal migration species.[10] If they are flying at night, it takes two or three days to reach their summer destinations.[11] Research suggests that they are using winds as a passive means to help migrate.[10] The direction of the winds influence their distribution within their summer range.[10] Typically, the winds blow in a north-northeast direction towards Northern and Midwest United States.[10] Factors such as warm temperatures and lack of Precipitation increases their range.[11] Cold temperatures, major precipitation, and unsuitable environmental conditions are factors that will stop migration to continue more north.[11] In late summer, cold fronts start to appear sending cues for them to leave.[10] As they leave they get caught up in these fronts which carry them south to southwest to their overwintering range.[10]

Habitat and range

Winter

Due to their inability to tolerate the cold winter temperatures they must migrate south.[10] Adults overwinter on hosts in the pine and mixed hardwood forests along the Gulf of Mexico and in the Southern United States.[12] Eastern Texas and Oklahoma, Virginia, Louisiana, Florida, Georgia, South and North Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi, have documented populations.[12] Before migrating back to their summer range they change their hosts to herbaceous legumes then to new spring foliage of deciduous trees.[12]

Summer

Their summer range extends across the Midwest and eastern parts of Canada and the United States.[13] In Canada, they are found only in the Great Lakes region.[10] They are able to inhabit a wide range of habitats.[9] Only about 32% of individuals actually occupy croplands.[9] The remaining individuals will reside in fields, woodlands, scrublands, waste places, and parks.[9] Precipitation will deposit individuals upon plant hosts where they will quickly re-establish themselves.[14]

Development and reproduction

Dispause

Before migrating they mate and enter reproductive diapause.[12] Empoasca fabae begin to enter into reproductive dispause at the end of July.[15] The entire population remains in this state for its migration and overwintering period.[12] This diapause period ends from mid-January through February, and they begin to sexually mature.[12]

Egg laying

During the spring migration north, the majority of the individuals are females.[16] When they return if temperatures are above 10 °C they can start oviposition and populations grow and re-establish themselves.[17] Empoasca fabae arrives back to their summer ranges during April or early May depending on the location.[18]

During the summer months they can, on average, lay eggs over a span of 96 days.[19] Peak population densities occur during late May to late June.[8] Many overlapping generations appear.[8] After this their population densities begin to decline slowly.[18] Individuals have a tendency to aggregate as their populations increase.[18] At the end of the summer, individuals either die or migrate south.[20]

Eggs and hatchlings

Eggs are laid on their hosts; they are transparent and small in size.[5] Females will lay 2 or 3 eggs a day on the plant’s stem and leaf veins.[21] The egg’s incubation period ranges from 4 through 23 days, the hatchings are called nymphs.[19] New hatchlings are white in colour and develop their green colouring as they age.[19] The nymphs undergo five instars before becoming adults.[16] As they develop, they lose their skin and develop their wings.[5] Empoasca fabae develops into adults in 8 through 37 days.[19] Their entire lifecycle is one month long.[21]

As a pest

Hopperburn

The visually descriptive term hopperburn is used for a distinct type of damage on plants by E. fabae's feeding on its hosts.[16] As they feed their saliva mechanically injures the phloem and parenchyma cells.[2] The plant also suffers damage to its vascular cambium, and to its vascular bundles.[16] Within 24 hours of being infested, rates of photosynthesis,and transpiration are reduced, leaves accumulate starch, and transport of photoassimilates are reduced.[7]

The first symptoms of hopperburn is that a leaflet's margins start to curl up.[7] As a plant's infestation increases, its leaves cup downward, and they start to turn from green to yellow.[22] In severe infestations this leads to leaf necrosis in which the leaf margins and intervein areas turn brown.[22] Older plants completely lose their leaves.[3] Young plants display tip-wilting and will be stunted in height.[3] Plants that were damaged by stem feeding suffered more damage to their physiologies than those which were damaged by leaf eating.[7]

Research has shown that water-stressed plants increase nymph's development time.[6] This causes severe hopperburn due to the increase plant stress response.[21]

Economic impacts

Hopperburn leads to reduced plant growth and reproduction.[3] In some heavily infested fields up to 75% of the yield is lost, it depends on what stage of development the plants are in.[13] Obviously, this leads to reductions in crop yields and large economic losses.[3] For example, in 1988 the losses of alfalfa crops in Northeast United States ranged from $32-$66 per hectare.[23] The amount of crop damage is directly proportional to the population density.[13] Most crop damage comes from the future generations of the initial arrivals back to the summer range.[11]

Climate change

Research has indicated that over the last 62 years that they have been arriving back to their summer range earlier by ten days.[24] Warmer temperatures increases the time and speed of egg hatching and nymph development.[17] There is increasing concern that climate change will shift the overwintering and summer ranges more northward.[24] This will exacerbate the problem of pest management and increase economic losses. .[24]

Pest management

Usually, crop detection of E. fabae is too late as hopperburn is the first visual symptom of a major infestation.[21] Regular crop inspections with a sweep net are essential to help reduce massive economic losses.[21] Another visual cue is the death of leaves with small pits holes throughout them resulting from their eggs.[5] Host expansion is likely caused from the loss of natural resistance through extensive plant breeding.[1]

Currently, the only effective method that exists for controlling E. fabae's infestations is the heavy application of insecticides.[13] Short-lived insecticides such as carbaryl are commonly used; however they require costly reapplications.[14]

Research is indicating the possibility of being able to control populations by increasing E. fabae's natural enemies as part of pest management plan.[25] Percent mortality has been shown to be highest in individuals in younger instars.[15] Research has shown that natural resistance and pesticide use are just as effective, but neither is capable to fully contain populations.[26] To create more effective management programs and reduce pesticide use it is essential to understand their dispersion, temporal and spatial patterns.[18]

gollark: Yes, o supreme one?
gollark: No, name it "Happy Fun Virtual Pet Game".
gollark: * police cops
gollark: Don't do paracetamol, kids.
gollark: They must be referred to as police cops.

References
  1. ”Lamp, W., D., Miranda, L., Culler & Alexander, L. (2011) “Host Suitability and Gas Exchange Response of Grapevines to Potato Leafhopper (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)”. Journal of Economic Entomology 104 (4): 1316–1322.
  2. ”Delay, B., P, Mamidala, A, Wijeratne., S, Wijerante, O, Mittapalli, J, Wang., and Lamp, W. (2012). “Transcriptome analysis of the salivary glands of potato leafhopper, Empoasca fabae”. Journal of Insect Physiology 58 (12): 1626–1634.
  3. E.A. Backus; M.S. Serrano; C.M. Ranger (2005). "Mechanisms of Hopperburn: An Overview of Insect Taxonomy, Behavior, and Physiology". Annual Review of Entomology. 50 (1): 125–151. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123310. PMID 15471532.
  4. "Bland R.G., Jaques H.E. (2010). How to Know the Insects 3rd Edition. Waveland Press Inc. p. 163.
  5. ”Dudley, J. (1921). “The Potato Leafhopper and its control”. United States Department of Agriculture: Farmers Bulletin 1225, 1–16..
  6. ” Hoffman, G., D, Hogg, & Boush, M. (1991). “Potato Leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) Life History Traits on Water-Stressed Alfalfa in the Early Regrowth and Bud Stage”. Environmental Entomology 20(4): 10581066.
  7. ”Lamp, W., Nielsen, G., Fuentes, C., & Quebedeaux, B. (2004) “Feeding Site Preference of Potato Leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on Alfalfa and its Effect on Photosynthesis”. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 21 (1): 25–38
  8. ”Potter, D., & Spicer, P. (1993). “Seasonal Phenology, Management, and Host Preferences of Potato Leafhopper on Nursery-Grown Maples” Journal of Environmental Horticulture 11(3): 101–106..
  9. ” Lamp, W., G, Nielson., & Danielson, S. (1994). “Patterns among Host Plants of Potato Leafhopper, Empoasca fabae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae.” Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 67(4): 354-368.
  10. "Taylor, R., & Reling, D. (1986). Preferred Wind Direction of Long-Distance Leafhopper (Empoasca fabae) Migrants and its Relevance to the Return Migration of Small Insects. Journal of Animal Ecology 55(3): 1103–1114.
  11. J.D. Carlson; M.E. Whalon; D.A. Landis & S.H. Gage (July 1992). "Springtime weather patterns coincident with long-distance migration of potato leafhopper into Michigan". Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 59 (3–4): 183–206. Bibcode:1992AgFM...59..183C. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(92)90092-I.
  12. ”Taylor, P., & Sheilds, E. (1995). “Phenology of Empoasca fabae (Harris) (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in its Overwintering Area and Proposed Seasonal Phenology”. Environmental Entomology 24 (5): 1096–1108.
  13. ”Medeiros, A., W, Tingey., & De Jong, W. (2004). “Mechanisms of Resistance to Potato Leafhopper, Empoasca fabae (Harris), in Potato”. American Journal of Potato Research 81(6): 431–441..
  14. ”Van Timmeren, S., J, Wise, C, Vandervoort., & Isaacs, R. (2011). “Comparison of foliar and soil formulations of neonicotinoid insecticides for control of potato leafhopper, Empoasca fabae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), in wine grapes.” Pest Management Science 67(5): 560–567.
  15. ” Erlandson, W., & Obrycki, J. (2015). “Population Dynamics of Empoasca fabae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in Central Iowa Alfalfa Fields.” Journal of Insect Science 15(1): 1-6.
  16. ”Maletta, M., M, Henninger, & Holmstrom, K. (2006). “Potato Leafhopper Control and Plastic Mulch Culture in Organic Potato Production”. HortTechnology 16 (2): 199-204.
  17. ”Sidumo, A., E, Sheilds., & Lembo, A. (2005). “Estimating the Potato Leafhopper Empoasca fabae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) Overwintering Range and Spring Premigrant Development by Using Geographic Information System.” Journal of Economic Entomology 98 (3): 757–764.
  18. ”Bentz, J., & Townsend, A. (2004). “Spatial and temporal patterns of abundance of the potato leafhopper among red maples.” Annals of Applied Biology 145(2): 157-164.
  19. ”Poos, F. (1932). “Biology of the Potato Leafhopper, Empoasca Fabae (Harris), and Some Closely Related Species of Empoasca.” Journal of Economic Entomology 25(3): 639-646.
  20. ”Taylor, P., E, Sheilds., M, Tauber., & Tauber, C. (1995). “Induction of Reproductive Diapause in Empoasca fabae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and Its Implications Regarding Southward Migration”. Environment Entomology 24 (5): 1086–1095.
  21. ”Townsend, L. (2012). “Potato Leafhoppers.” University of Kentucky. Version 2012.2. ENT facts http://www2.ca.uky.edu/entomology/entfacts/ef115.asp Retrieved 28 November 2015
  22. "Murray, J., M, Paul., & Schaafma, A. (2001) “Determination of traits associated with leafhopper (Empoasca fabae and Empoasca kraemeri) resistance and dissection of leafhopper damage symptoms in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”. Annals of Applied Biology. 139(3): 319-327.
  23. Lamp,W., Nielsen, G., & Dively, G. (1991)“Insect Pest-Induced Losses in Alfalfa: Patterns in Maryland and Implications for Management.” Journal of Economic Entomology 84(2): 610-618..
  24. ” Baker, M., P, Venugopal., & Lamp, W. (2015). “Climate Change and Phenology: Empoasca fabae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) Migration and Severity of Impact”. PLoS ONE 10 (5): 1–12
  25. ”Erlandson, W., & Obrycki, J. (2010). “Predation of Immature and Adult Empoasca fabae (Harris) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) by Three Species of Predatory Insects.” Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 83(1): 1-6.
  26. Ghidiu, G., D, Douches., K, Flecher., & Coombs, J. (2011). “Comparing Host Plant Resistance, Engineered Resistance, and Insecticide Treatment for Control of Colorado Potato Beetle and Potato Leafhopper in Potatoes.” International Journal of Agronomy 11(6): 516–523
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.