Eleventeen (EP)

Eleventeen is the first recording by the American rock band Eve 6, released in 1996. It is their only EP, and has more of a rock-oriented punk sound than their future releases.

For the album by Daisy Chainsaw, see Eleventeen (album).
Eleventeen
EP by
Released1996
RecordedAtlantic City, NJ
GenrePunk
Length19:54
ProducerHarold Miner
Eve 6 chronology
Eleventeen
(1996)
Eve 6
(1998)

This is the only release on which Nick Meyers performs before Tony Fagenson joined the band.

Track listing

All lyrics are written by Max Collins; all music is composed by Collins, except where noted.

No.TitleLength
1."Foiled Again"2:55
2."Indian Giver" (Collins, Jon Siebels, Nick Meyers)3:01
3."#1"3:47
4."Propaganda"2:34
5."Fooling Yourself"3:36
6."Nocturnal Emission"1:50
7."Jibba This" (Collins, Siebels, Meyers)2:11
Total length:19:54

Note 1: "Nocturnal Emission" was re-tooled and released on the Eve 6 record Horrorscope as "Nocturnal"

Note 2: "Jibba This" is a hidden track which plays after "Nocturnal Emission" while still playing track 6.

Personnel

gollark: It's osmarkspythonbuildsystem™, actually.
gollark: Maybe you should rewrite it in Rust.
gollark: Thusly, git.osmarks.net is C.
gollark: > Allows visitors to look and download without authenticating. (A+0)Yes.> Does not log anything about visitors. (A+1)No. Your IP and user agent are logged for purposes.> Follows the criteria in The Electronic Frontier Foundation's best practices for online service providers. (A+2)> Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) standard. (A+3)> Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)Probably not.> All data contributed by the project owner and contributors is exportable in a machine-readable format. (A+5)No idea. There might be an API.
gollark: > All important site functions work correctly (though may not look as nice) when the user disables execution of JavaScript and other code sent by the site. (A0)I think they *mostly* do.> Server code released as free software. (A1)Yes.> Encourages use of GPL 3-or-later as preferred option. (A2)> Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option. (A3)> Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license) for works for practical use. (A4)See above. Although not ALLOWING licenses like that would be very not free.> Does not recommend services that are SaaSS. (A5)Yes.> Says “free software,” not “open source.” (A6)Don't know if it says either.> Clearly endorses the Free Software Movement's ideas of freedom. (A7)No.> Avoids saying “Linux” without “GNU” when referring to GNU/Linux. (A8)It says neither.> Insists that each nontrivial file in a package clearly and unambiguously state how it is licensed. (A9)No, and this is stupid.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.