Ejnar Mikkelsen Range

Ejnar Mikkelsen Range (Danish: Ejnar Mikkelsen Fjeld)[1] is a mountain range in King Christian IX Land, eastern Greenland. Administratively it is part of the Sermersooq Municipality.

Ejnar Mikkelsen Range
Defense Mapping Agency map of Greenland sheet.
Highest point
PeakEjnar Mikkelsen Fjeld
Elevation3,282 m (10,768 ft)
Dimensions
Length23 km (14 mi) N/S
Width7 km (4.3 mi) E/W
Geography
Location in Greenland
CountryGreenland
Range coordinates68°53′N 28°37′W
Parent rangeWatkins Range

The range is part of the greater Watkins Range and is named after Danish polar explorer Ejnar Mikkelsen. The highest peak is one of the most impressive mountains in Greenland and has a good reputation among alpinists.[2] It was first climbed in 1970 by Andrew Ross leading a Scottish team,[3] and for the second time in 1998 by Roland Aeschimann leading a Swiss team.[4]

Geography

The Ejnar Mikkelsen Range is a long nunatak with high peaks extending for about 23 km (14 mi) in a north-south direction. It is located east of the main Watkins Range on the eastern side of the Kronborg Glacier and west of the Borgtinderne, another nunatak with high peaks. Its northern end connects with the northern part of the Watkins Range. The area of this range is uninhabited.[5]

Mountains

The highest point in the range is 3,282.7 m (10,770 ft) high Ejnar Mikkelsen Fjeld main peak, a massive mountain having a black rock needle at the top that marks the true summit.[6] None of the other peaks in the nunatak rises above 3,000 m (9,800 ft). This summit is one of the highest summits in Greenland and it is marked as a 3,325 m (10,909 ft) peak in some sources.[7]

Climate

Polar climate prevails in the region. The average annual temperature in the area of the range is -14 °C. The warmest month is July when the average temperature reaches -2 °C and the coldest is February when the temperature sinks to -22 °C.[8]

gollark: I guess it's possible that even one which doesn't know about parties might accidentally be biased due to (hypothetically, I don't know if this is true) one party being popular in low-density areas and the other in high-density, or really any other difference in locations.
gollark: You don't actually need simple shapes very badly as long as you have an algorithm which is not likely to be biased.
gollark: Okay, rearrange the states so they're square.
gollark: A simple if slightly inaccurate way would be some kind of binary space partitioning thing, where (pretending the US is a perfect square) you just repeatedly divide it in half (alternatingly vertically/horizontally), but stop dividing a particular subregion when population goes below some target number.
gollark: The more complex the algorithm the more people might try and manipulate it. The obvious* solution is to just split up the country by latitude/longitude grid squares.

See also

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.