Dualizing sheaf

In algebraic geometry, the dualizing sheaf on a proper scheme X of dimension n over a field k is a coherent sheaf together with a linear functional

that induces a natural isomorphism of vector spaces

for each coherent sheaf F on X (the superscript * refers to a dual vector space).[1] The linear functional is called a trace morphism.

A pair , if it is exists, is unique up to a natural isomorphism. In fact, in the language of category theory, is an object representing the contravariant functor from the category of coherent sheaves on X to the category of k-vector spaces.

For a normal projective variety X, the dualizing sheaf exists and it is in fact the canonical sheaf: where is a canonical divisor. More generally, the dualizing sheaf exists for any projective scheme.

There is the following variant of Serre's duality theorem: for a projective scheme X of pure dimension n and a Cohen–Macaulay sheaf F on X such that is of pure dimension n, there is a natural isomorphism[2]

.

In particular, if X itself is a Cohen–Macaulay scheme, then the above duality holds for any locally free sheaf.

Relative dualizing sheaf

Given a proper finitely presented morphism of schemes , (Kleiman 1980) defines the relative dualizing sheaf or as[3] the sheaf such that for each open subset and a quasi-coherent sheaf on , there is a canonical isomorphism

,

which is functorial in and commutes with open restrictions.

Example:[4] If is a local complete intersection morphism between schemes of finite type over a field, then (by definition) each point of has an open neighborhood and a factorization , a regular embedding of codimension followed by a smooth morphism of relative dimension . Then

where is the sheaf of relative Kähler differentials and is the normal bundle to .

See also: Hodge bundle (which is the direct image of a relative dualizing sheaf).

gollark: What if it says "SULFURIC ACID - NOT SHAMPOO"?
gollark: If you go around buying something because it's "new" you're a bit of an apioform.
gollark: Does it *matter*? "New" doesn't exactly mean much.
gollark: "THE KNOWLEDGE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF UNLEASHING INDESCRIBABLE HORRORS THAT SHATTER YOUR PSYCHE AND SET YOUR MIND ADRIFT IN THE UNKNOWABLY INFINITE COSMOS.", sort of thing?
gollark: And make it large?

See also

References

  1. Hartshorne, Ch. III, § 7.
  2. Kollár–Mori, Theorem 5.71.
  3. Kleiman 1980, Definition 6
  4. Arbarello–Cornalba–Griffiths 2011, Ch. X., near the end of § 2.
  • E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, and P.A. Griffiths, Geometry of algebraic curves. Vol. II, with a contribution by Joseph Daniel Harris, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 268, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. MR-2807457
  • Kleiman, Steven L. Relative duality for quasicoherent sheaves. Compositio Math. 41 (1980), no. 1, 39–60.
  • Kollár, János; Mori, Shigefumi (1998), Birational geometry of algebraic varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 134, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-63277-5, MR 1658959
  • Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.