Document layout analysis

In computer vision or natural language processing, document layout analysis is the process of identifying and categorizing the regions of interest in the scanned image of a text document. A reading system requires the segmentation of text zones from non-textual ones and the arrangement in their correct reading order.[1] Detection and labeling of the different zones (or blocks) as text body, illustrations, math symbols, and tables embedded in a document is called geometric layout analysis.[2] But text zones play different logical roles inside the document (titles, captions, footnotes, etc.) and this kind of semantic labeling is the scope of the logical layout analysis.

Document layout analysis is the union of geometric and logical labeling. It is typically performed before a document image is sent to an OCR engine, but it can be used also to detect duplicate copies of the same document in large archives, or to index documents by their structure or pictorial content.

Document layout is formally defined in the international standard ISO 8613-1:1989.

Overview of methods

There are two main approaches to document layout analysis. Firstly, there are bottom-up approaches which iteratively parse a document based on the raw pixel data. These approaches typically first parse a document into connected regions of black and white, then these regions are grouped into words, then into text lines, and finally into text blocks.[3][4] Secondly, there are top-down approaches which attempt to iteratively cut up a document into columns and blocks based on white space and geometric information.[4]

The bottom-up approaches are the traditional ones, and they have the advantage that they require no assumptions on the overall structure of the document. On the other hand, bottom-up approaches require iterative segmentation and clustering, which can be time consuming.[4] Top-down approaches are newer, and have the advantage that they parse the global structure of a document directly, thus eliminating the need to iteratively cluster together the possibly hundreds or even thousands of characters/symbols which appear on a document. They tend to be faster, but in order for them to operate robustly they typically require a number of assumptions to be made about on the layout of the document.[4] There are two issues common to any approach at document layout analysis: noise and skew. Noise refers to image noise, such as salt and pepper noise or Gaussian noise. Skew refers to the fact that a document image may be rotated in a way so that the text lines are not perfectly horizontal. It is a common assumption in both document layout analysis algorithms and optical character recognition algorithms that the characters in the document image are oriented so that text lines are horizontal. Therefore, if there is skew present then it is important to rotate the document image so as to remove it.

It follows that the first steps in any document layout analysis code are to remove image noise and to come up with an estimate for the skew angle of the document.

Example of a bottom up approach

In this section we will walk through the steps of a bottom-up document layout analysis algorithm developed in 1993 by O`Gorman.[3] The steps in this approach are as follows:

1. Preprocess the image to remove Gaussian and salt-and-pepper noise. Note that some noise removal filters may consider commas and periods as noise, so some care must be taken.
2. Convert the image into a binary image, i.e. convert each pixel value to completely white or completely black.
3. Segment the image into connected components of black pixels. These are the symbols of the image. For each symbol, compute a bounding box and centroid.
4. For each symbol, determine its k nearest neighbors where k is an integer greater than or equal to four. O`Gorman suggests k=5 in his paper as a good compromise between robustness and speed. The reason to use at least k=4 is that for a symbol in a document, the two or three nearest symbols are the ones right next to it on the same text line. The fourth-nearest symbol is typically on a line right above or below, and it is important to include these symbols in the nearest neighbor calculation for the following.
5. Each nearest neighbor pair of symbols is related by a vector pointing from one symbol’s centroid to the other symbol’s centroid. If these vectors are plotted for every pair of nearest neighbor symbols, then one gets what is called the docstrum for the document (See figure below). One can also use the angle Θ from the horizontal and distance D between two nearest neighbor symbols and create a nearest-neighbor angle and nearest-neighbor distance histogram.
6. Using the nearest-neighbor angle histogram, the skew of the document can be calculated. If the skew is acceptably low, continue to the next step. If it is not, rotate the image so as to remove the skew and return to step 3.
7. The nearest-neighbor distance histogram has several peaks, and these peaks typically represent between-character spacing, between-word spacing, and between-line spacing. Calculate these values from the histogram and set them aside.
8. For each symbol, look at its nearest neighbors and flag any of them that are a distance away which is within some tolerance of the between-character spacing distance or between-word spacing distance. For each nearest neighbor symbol which is flagged, draw a line segment connecting their centroids.
9. Symbols connected to their neighbors by line segments form text lines. Using all the centroids in a text line, one can compute an actual line segment representing the text line with linear regression. This is important because it is unlikely that all the centroids of symbols in a text line are actually collinear.
10. For each pair of text lines, one can compute a minimum distance between their corresponding line segments. If this distance is within some tolerance of the between-line spacing calculated in step 7, then the two text lines are grouped into the same text block.
11. Finally, one can calculate a bounding box for each text block, and the document layout analysis is complete.

Layout analysis software

• OCRopus – A free document layout analysis and OCR system, implemented in C++ and Python and for FreeBSD, Linux, and Mac OS X. This software supports a plug-in architecture which allows the user to select from a variety of different document layout analysis and OCR algorithms.
• OCRFeeder – An OCR suite for Linux, written in python, which also supports document layout analysis. This software is actively being developed, and is free and open-source.

See also

• Document processing
• Open Document Architecture
• Page layout

External links

• High Performance Document Layout Analysis by Thomas M. Breuel, at PARC, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2003
• Geometric Layout Analysis Techniques for Document Image Understanding: a Review, ITC-irst Technical Report TR#9703-09, 1998.

Further reading

• O'Gorman, L. (1993). "The document spectrum for page layout analysis". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 15 (11): 1162–1173. doi:10.1109/34.244677.
• Simon, A.; Pret, J.-C.; Johnson, A.P. (1997). "A fast algorithm for bottom-up document layout analysis". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 19 (3): 273–277. doi:10.1109/34.584106.
• Seong-Whan Lee; Dae-Seok Ryu (2001). "Parameter-free geometric document layout analysis". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 23 (11): 1240–1256. doi:10.1109/34.969115.
• Dengel, Andreas; Barth, Gerhard (1989). "ANASTASIL: hybrid knowledge-based system for document layout analysis". Ijcai'89: 1249–1254. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

References

1. Baird, K.S. (July 1992). "Anatomy of a versatile page reader". Proceedings of the IEEE. 80 (7): 1059–1065. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.40.8060. doi:10.1109/5.156469.
2. Cattoni, R.; Coianiz, T.; Messelodi, S.; Modena, C. M. "Geometric Layout Analysis Techniques for Document Image Understanding: a Review". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
3. O'Gorman, L. (1993). "The document spectrum for page layout analysis". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 15 (11): 1162–1173. doi:10.1109/34.244677.
4. Seong-Whan Lee; Dae-Seok Ryu (2001). "Parameter-free geometric document layout analysis". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 23 (11): 1240–1256. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.574.7875. doi:10.1109/34.969115.