Dixie-Monon Conference

The Dixie-Monon Athletic Conference was an IHSAA-sanctioned conference in Southern Indiana. The conference was formed as a merger between the Dixie and Southern Monon conferences in 1965, and by its third year had grown to 12 members. However, soon after, consolidation started chipping away at the conference, and it ended in 1974, as only three schools were left.

Membership
School Location Mascot Colors County Year Joined Previous Conference Year Left Conference Joined
Borden Borden Braves                10
Clark		 1965 Southern Monon 1971 Lost River
Crothersville1 Crothersville Tigers           36
Jackson		 1965 Dixie/
Jackson County		 1969 Mid-Hoosier
Deputy Deputy Warriors           39
Jefferson		 1965 Dixie 1968 none (consolidated
into Madison
Eastern (Pekin) New Pekin Musketeers                88
Washington		 1965 Southern Monon 1971 Lost River
Fayetteville2 Fayetteville Lions                47
Lawrence		 1965 Lawrence County/
Southern Monon		 1974 none (consolidated into
Bedford-North Lawrence)
Henryville Henryville Hornets                10
Clark		 1965 Dixie 1971 Lost River
Medora1 Medora Hornets           36
Jackson		 1965 Jackson County/
Southern Monon		 1974 Independents
(TRAC 1979)
New
Washington		 New
Washington		 Mustangs                10
Clark		 1965 Dixie 1974 Southern
Orleans Orleans Bulldogs                59
Orange		 1965 Southern Monon 1971 Lost River
Tunnelton2 Tunnelton Indians           47
Lawrence		 1965 Lawrence County/
Southern Monon		 1974 none (consolidated into
Bedford-North Lawrence)
West Washington Campbellsburg Senators                88
Washington		 1965 Southern Monon 1971 Lost River
Clear Spring Clear Spring Purple Warriors                36
Jackson		 1967 Jackson County 1969 none (consolidated into
Brownstown Central
Heltonville Heltonville Blue Jackets           47
Lawrence		 1970 Lawrence County 1974 none (consolidated into
Bedford-North Lawrence)
  1. Played concurrently in DMC and JCC 1965–67.
  2. Played concurrently in DMC and LCC 1965–70.

Resources


gollark: It's actually quaternionic.
gollark: To some extent I guess you could ship worse/nonexistent versions of some machinery and assemble it there, but a lot would be interdependent so I don't know how much. And you'd probably need somewhat better computers to run something to manage the resulting somewhat more complex system, which means more difficulty.
gollark: Probably at least 3 hard. Usefully extracting the many ores and such you want from things, and then processing them into usable materials probably involves a ton of different processes you have to ship on the space probe. Then you have to convert them into every different part you might need, meaning yet more machinery. And you have to do this with whatever possibly poor quality resources you find, automatically with no human to fix issues, accurately enough to reach whatever tolerances all the stuff needs, and have it stand up to damage on route.
gollark: 3.00005.
gollark: Without GregTech. I haven't used it recently, which is probably for the best.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.