Digital twin

A digital twin is a digital replica of a living or non-living physical entity.[1] Digital twin refers to a digital replica of potential and actual physical assets (physical twin), processes, people, places, systems and devices that can be used for various purposes.[2] The digital representation provides both the elements and the dynamics of how an Internet of things (IoT) device operates and lives throughout its life cycle.[3] Definitions of digital twin technology used in prior research emphasize two important characteristics. Firstly, each definition emphasizes the connection between the physical model and the corresponding virtual model or virtual counterpart.[4] Secondly, this connection is established by generating real-time data using sensors.[5] The concept of the digital twin can be compared to other concepts such as cross-reality environments or co-spaces and mirror models, which aim to, by and large, synchronise part of the physical world (e.g., an object or place) with its cyber representation (which can be an abstraction of some aspects of the physical world).[6][7]

Digital twins integrate IoT, artificial intelligence, machine learning and software analytics with spatial network graphs[8] to create living digital simulation models that update and change as their physical counterparts change. A digital twin continuously learns and updates itself from multiple sources to represent its near real-time status, working condition or position. This learning system learns from itself, using sensor data that conveys various aspects of its operating condition; from human experts, such as engineers with deep and relevant industry domain knowledge; from other similar machines; from other similar fleets of machines; and from the larger systems and environment of which it may be a part. A digital twin also integrates historical data from past machine usage to factor into its digital model.

In various industrial sectors, twins are being used to optimize the operation and maintenance of physical assets, systems and manufacturing processes.[9] They are a formative technology for the Industrial internet of things (IIoT), where physical objects can live and interact with other machines and people virtually.[10] In the context of the IoT, they are also referred to as "cyberobjects", or "digital avatars".[11] The digital twin is also a component of cyber-physical systems.

Definitions
Definitions of digital twins used in literature
Definition Authors
"The Digital Twin is a set of virtual information constructs that fully describes a potential or actual physical manufactured product from the micro atomic level to the macro geometrical level. At its optimum, any information that could be obtained from inspecting a physical manufactured product can be obtained from its Digital Twin." Grieves & Vickers (2016)[12]
"A Digital Twin is an integrated multiphysics, multiscale, probabilistic simulation of an as-built vehicle or system that uses the best available physical models, sensor updates, fleet history, etc., to mirror the life of its corresponding flying twin" Glaessgen & Stargel, (2012)[13]
"digital twin is a real mapping of all components in the product life cycle using physical data, virtual data and interaction data between them" Tao, Sui, Liu, Qi, Zhang, Song, Guo, Lu & Nee, (2018)[14]
"a dynamic virtual representation of a physical object or system across its lifecycle, using real-time data to enable understanding, learning and reasoning" Bolton, McColl-Kennedy, Cheung, Gallen, Orsingher, Witell & Zaki, (2018)[15]
"Using a digital copy of the physical system to perform real-time optimization" Söderberg, R., Wärmefjord, K., Carlson, J. S., & Lindkvist, L. (2017)[16]
"A digital twin is a real time digital replica of a physical device" Bacchiega (2017)[17]
"A digital twin is a digital replica of a living or non-living physical entity. By bridging the physical and the virtual world, data is transmitted seamlessly allowing the virtual entity to exist simultaneously with the physical entity." El Saddik, A. (2018)[1]
In the context of Digital Built Britain a digital twin is "a realistic digital representation of assets, processes or systems in the built or natural environment" The Gemini Principles (2018)[18]

Origin and types of digital twins

Digital twins were anticipated by David Gelernter's 1991 book Mirror Worlds.[19][20] It is widely acknowledged in both industry and academic publications[21][22][23][24][25][26] that Michael Grieves of Florida Institute of Technology first applied the digital twin concept in manufacturing. The concept and model of the digital twin was publicly introduced in 2002 by Grieves, then of the University of Michigan, at a Society of Manufacturing Engineers conference in Troy, Michigan.[27] Grieves proposed the digital twin as the conceptual model underlying product lifecycle management (PLM).

The concept, which had a few different names, was subsequently called the "digital twin" by John Vickers of NASA in a 2010 Roadmap Report.[28] The digital twin concept consists of three distinct parts: the physical product, the digital/virtual product, and connections between the two products. The connections between the physical product and the digital/virtual product is data that flows from the physical product to the digital/virtual product and information that is available from the digital/virtual product to the physical environment.

The concept was divided into types later[12]. The types are the digital twin prototype (DTP), the digital twin instance (DTI), and the digital twin aggregate (DTA). The DTP consists of the designs, analyses, and processes to realize a physical product. The DTP exists before there is a physical product. The DTI is the digital twin of each individual instance of the product once it is manufactured. The DTA is the aggregation of DTIs whose data and information can be used for interrogation about the physical product, prognostics, and learning. The specific information contained in the digital twins is driven by use cases. The digital twin is a logical construct, meaning that the actual data and information may be contained in other applications.

A digital twin in the workplace is often considered part of robotic process automation (RPA) and, per industry-analyst firm Gartner, is part of the broader and emerging "hyperautomation" category.

Examples

An example of how digital twins are used to optimize machines is with the maintenance of power generation equipment such as power generation turbines, jet engines and locomotives.

Another example of digital twins is the use of 3D modeling to create digital companions for the physical objects.[29][30][31][23][24] It can be used to view the status of the actual physical object, which provides a way to project physical objects into the digital world.[32] For example, when sensors collect data from a connected device, the sensor data can be used to update a "digital twin" copy of the device's state in real time.[33][34][35] The term "device shadow" is also used for the concept of a digital twin.[36] The digital twin is meant to be an up-to-date and accurate copy of the physical object's properties and states, including shape, position, gesture, status and motion.[37]

A digital twin also can be used for monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics to optimize asset performance and utilization. In this field, sensory data can be combined with historical data, human expertise and fleet and simulation learning to improve the outcome of prognostics.[38] Therefore, complex prognostics and intelligent maintenance system platforms can use digital twins in finding the root cause of issues and improve productivity.

Digital twins of autonomous vehicles and their sensor suite embedded in a traffic and environment simulation have also been proposed as a means to overcome the significant development, testing and validation challenges for the automotive application,[39] in particular when the related algorithms are based on artificial intelligence approaches that require extensive training data and validation data sets.

Further examples of industry applications:

Manufacturing industry

The physical manufacturing objects are virtualized and represented as digital twin models (avatars) seamlessly and closely integrated in both the physical and cyber spaces.[48] Physical objects and twin models interact in a mutually beneficial manner.

Industry-level dynamics

The digital twin is disrupting the entire product lifecycle management (PLM), from manufacturing to service and operations.[49] Nowadays, PLM is very time consuming in terms of efficiency, manufacturing, intelligence, service phases and sustainability in product design. A digital twin can merge the product physical and virtual space.[50] The digital twin enables companies to have a digital footprint of all of their products, from design to development and throughout the entire product life cycle.[51][52] Broadly speaking, industries with manufacturing business are highly disrupted by digital twins. In the manufacturing process, the digital twin is like a virtual replica of the near-time occurrences in the factory. Thousands of sensors are being placed throughout the physical manufacturing process, all collecting data from different dimensions, such as environmental conditions, behavioural characteristics of the machine and work that is being performed. All this data is continuously communicating and collected by the digital twin.[51]

Due to the Internet of Things, digital twins have become more affordable and could drive the future of the manufacturing industry. A benefit for engineers lays in real-world usage of products that are virtually being designed by the digital twin. Advanced ways of product and asset maintenance and management come within reach as there is a digital twin of the real 'thing' with real-time capabilities.[53]

Digital twins offer a great amount of business potential by predicting the future instead of analyzing the past of the manufacturing process.[54] The representation of reality created by digital twins allows manufacturers to evolve towards ex-ante business practices.[49] The future of manufacturing drives on the following four aspects: modularity, autonomy, connectivity and digital twin.[55] As there is an increasing digitalization in the stages of a manufacturing process, opportunities are opening up to achieve a higher productivity. This starts with modularity and leading to higher effectiveness in the production system. Furthermore, autonomy enables the production system to respond to unexpected events in an efficient and intelligent way. Lastly, connectivity like the Internet of Things, makes the closing of the digitalization loop possible, by then allowing the following cycle of product design and promotion to be optimized for higher performance.[55] This may lead to increase in customer satisfaction and loyalty when products can determine a problem before actually breaking down.[49] Furthermore, as storage and computing costs are becoming less expensive, the ways in which digital twins are used are expanding.[51]

Firm-level dynamics

Several firms — including General Electric, Arctic Wind, and Mechanical Solutions — are investing in digital twins to increase effectiveness.

General Electric has a system based on digital twins and uses this software to administer and analyze data from wind turbines, oil rigs and aircraft they produce.[56] The system they use for aircraft collects, per engine, all data of a flight between London and Paris. The data is transferred to a data centre, where it generates a real-time digital twin of each engine. In this way, General Electric is able to detect potential defects or faults already during the flight. So, if a part of the engine is causing a fault, the personnel that is responsible for maintenance can have the replacement part ready at the airport where the aircraft will land.

Arctic Wind, a firm that owns and operates multiple wind power plants in Norway, wanted a solution to keep track of the health of their wind turbines they produce. These turbines are costly, and all parts require constant monitoring. The maintenance of these turbines is challenging because of long periods of darkness and low temperatures. To find a solution against the elements, they have installed sensors on all their wind turbines and the data that comes from these sensors is transported over 1,000 miles away to the office. This provides the digital twin real-time data of the wind turbines, therefore employees are able to visualize any problems as they happen. In addition, the digital twin provides the firm with future prognoses, so they can run simulations of how the turbines will perform under different extreme circumstances. In this way, Arctic Wind knows if they have to shut down operations during an extreme storm or not.

Mechanical Solutions Inc. (MSI), a company which specializes in turbomachines, used Siemens STAR-CMM+ software. This software enables product development organizations to make use of a digital twin. MSI successfully implemented this software in their process chain as a troubleshooting and design tool. This enabled the cost-efficient engineering process to solve very complex problems, they could not have solved without the digital twin.[57]

Embedded digital twin

Remembering that a definition of digital twin is a real time digital replica of a physical device, manufacturers are embedding digital twin in their device. Proven advantages are improved quality, earlier fault detection and better feedback on product usage to product designer.[5]

Urban planning and the built environment industry

Geographic digital twins have been popularised in urban planning practice, given the increasing appetite for digital technology in the Smart Cities movement. These digital twins are often proposed in the form of interactive platforms to capture and display real-time 3D and 4D spatial data in order to model urban environments (cities) and the data feeds within them.[58]

Visualisation technologies such as augmented reality (AR) systems are being used as both collaborative tools for design and planning in the built environment integrating data feeds from embedded sensors in cities and API services to form digital twins. For example, AR can be used to create augmented reality maps, buildings and data feeds projected onto tabletops for collaborative viewing by built environment professionals.[59]

In the built environment, partly through the adoption of building information modeling processes, planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance activities are increasingly being digitised, and digital twins of built assets are seen as a logical extension - at an individual asset level and at a national level. In the United Kingdom in November 2018, for example, the Centre for Digital Built Britain published The Gemini Principles,[18] outlining principles to guide development of a "national digital twin".[60]

Healthcare industry

Industry-level dynamics

Healthcare is recognized as an industry being disrupted by the digital twin technology.[61][50] The concept of digital twin in the healthcare industry was originally proposed and first used in product or equipment prognostics.[50] With a digital twin, lives can be improved in terms of medical health, sports and education by taking a more data-driven approach to healthcare.[49] The availability of technologies makes it possible to build personalized models for patients, continuously adjustable based on tracked health and lifestyle parameters. This can ultimately lead to a virtual patient, with detailed description of the healthy state of an individual patient and not only on previous records. Furthermore, the digital twin enables individual's records to be compared to the population in order to easier find patterns with great detail.[61] The biggest benefit of the digital twin on the healthcare industry is the fact that healthcare can be tailored to anticipate on the responses of individual patients. Digital twins will not only lead to better resolutions when defining the health of an individual patient but also change the expected image of a healthy patient. Previously, 'healthy' was seen as the absence of disease indications. Now, 'healthy' patients can be compared to the rest of the population in order to really define healthy.[61] However, the emergence of the digital twin in healthcare also brings some downsides. The digital twin may lead to inequality, as the technology might not be accessible for everyone by widening the gap between the rich and poor. Furthermore, the digital twin will identify patterns in a population which may lead to discrimination.[61][62]

Firm-level dynamics

Looking more specifically on a firm-level, several incumbent firms are investing and developing healthcare solution with the digital twin. For example, Philips has explored the idea of a digital version of the patient so that patients can use a digital twin to better act in a preventive way instead of a reactive way.[63]

"The Living Heart"[64] is a collaboration between Stanford University and HPE where multi-scale 3D models of the heart were created to monitor circulation and to virtually test medications,[65] which are still in development in order to ultimately prevent harmful side effects.[66] Lastly, Siemens has developed a similar digital health twin. By making use of artificial intelligence, doctors can make more precise diagnoses.[67]

Developing a digital twin is a considerable investment. However, by making use of a cloud-based platform and a modular organization, it may also be possible for smaller organizations to contribute to a certain module.[62] One of those organizations is Sim&Cure, which is the first company to market a patient-based simulation model for treatment of aneurysms. This treatment allows prediction of deployment of medical devices. Their product Sim&Size is an implant composed of three applications used to heal patients of neurovascular disorders such as aneurysms.[68]

Automotive industry

Industry-level dynamics

Another industry that has been disrupted by digital twin technology is the automobile industry. Digital twins in the automobile industry are implemented by using existing data in order to facilitate processes and reduce marginal costs. Currently, automobile designers expand the existing physical materiality by incorporating software-based digital abilities.[69] A specific example of digital twin technology in the automotive industry is where automotive engineers use digital twin technology in combination with the firm's analytical tool in order to analyze how a specific car is driven. In doing so, they can suggest incorporating new features in the car that can reduce car accidents on the road, which was previously not possible in such a short time frame.[70]

Firm-level dynamics (Volkswagen & Tesla)

One of the incumbent automobile firms that is incorporating digital twin technology in their business processes is Volkswagen. The use of this technology, which they refer to as a "virtual twin", has allowed Volkswagen to create digital 3D prototypes of their different car models, such as the Golf.[71] The Pre-Series Center in Wolfsburg is the specialized department of the virtual prototype team, where they put together digital representations of the vehicles, that are used from the point of assembly and throughout the lifecycle of the cars. The digital twins support the production process and development of the cars, by providing all employees worldwide with detailed and real-time data of the model. Leingang, one of the leaders of the virtual prototype team, describes how the implementation of digital twins helps Volkswagen to optimize their product lifecycle management. "Our work helps people in design, quality assurance, body construction, and assembly. (...) This is because the 'digital twin' lets our colleagues know early on what exactly needs to be done when mounting a particular component.".[71] Another innovative department in Wolfsburg, Volkswagen's Virtual Engineering Lab, further develops the use of digital representations and digital tools in combination with augmented reality. Here they make use of the Microsoft HoloLens, which enables engineers and designers to view and modify digital twins, assisted by other technologies such as gesture control and voice commands.[72]

Unlike incumbents in the automobile industry that have been wrapping digital technologies around their traditional products in the last couple of years, relatively new player Tesla, Inc. has been involved with (digitally) innovating the industry from the moment the firm entered the market.[73] Besides stimulating the switch towards the adoption and use of electric vehicles by the mainstream, Tesla has been innovating vehicles by implementing software-based tools in the physical product, including digital twin technology.[73][74] Tesla creates a digital twin for every electric car they manufacture, which provides the firm with a constant stream of data going from the vehicle to the manufacturing plant and vice versa, allowing Tesla to increase the reliability of the car by predicting any kind of maintenance from a distance.[75] The digital nature of Tesla vehicles, enables the firm to resolve most maintenance issues remotely, by using the received data of the digital twin, for example, "if a driver has a rattle in a door, it can be fixed by downloading software that tweaks the hydraulics of that particular door".[75] Tesla continues to develop and update their software and other digital technologies, in order to sustain their status of a successful innovator.[74]

Comparing the strategies of these two well-known automotive firms, it seems that Volkswagen has implemented digital twin technology as an offensive reaction to Tesla's innovative approach to the automotive industry. By transitioning to the new technology, Volkswagen has framed this challenge as an opportunity by creating a new, specialised department for virtual prototyping rather than fleeing to either a new market or a niche.[76]

The characteristics of digital twin technology

Digital technologies have certain characteristics that distinguish them from other technologies. These characteristics, in turn, have certain consequences. Digital twins have the following characteristics.

Connectivity

One of the main characteristics of digital twin technology is its connectivity. The recent development of the Internet of Things (IoT) brings forward numerous new technologies. The development of IoT also brings forward the development of digital twin technology. This technology shows many characteristics that have similarities with the character of the IoT, namely its connective nature. First and foremost, the technology enables connectivity between the physical component and its digital counterpart. The basis of digital twins is based on this connection, without it, digital twin technology would not exist. As described in the previous section, this connectivity is created by sensors on the physical product which obtain data and integrate and communicate this data through various integration technologies. Digital twin technology enables increased connectivity between organizations, products, and customers.[52] For example, connectivity between partners in a supply chain can be increased by enabling members of this supply chain to check the digital twin of a product or asset. These partners can then check the status of this product by simply checking the digital twin.

Also, connectivity with customers can be increased.

Servitization is the process of organizations that are adding value to their core corporate offerings through services.[77] In the case of the example of engines, the manufacturing of the engine is the core offering of this organization, they then add value by providing a service of checking the engine and offering maintenance.

Homogenization

Digital twins can be further characterized as a digital technology that is both the consequence and an enabler of the homogenization of data. Due to the fact that any type of information or content can now be stored and transmitted in the same digital form, it can be used to create a virtual representation of the product (in the form of a digital twin), thus decoupling the information from its physical form.[78] Therefore, the homogenization of data and the decoupling of the information from its physical artifact, have allowed digital twins to come into existence. However, digital twins also enable increasingly more information on physical products to be stored digitally and become decoupled from the product itself.[69]

As data is increasingly digitized, it can be transmitted, stored and computed in fast and low-cost ways.[69] According to Moore's law, computing power will continue to increase exponentially over the coming years, while the cost of computing decreases significantly. This would, therefore, lead to lower marginal costs of developing digital twins and make it comparatively much cheaper to test, predict, and solve problems on virtual representations rather than testing on physical models and waiting for physical products to break before intervening.

Another consequence of the homogenization and decoupling of information is that the user experience converges. As information from physical objects is digitized, a single artifact can have multiple new affordances.[69] Digital twin technology allows detailed information about a physical object to be shared with a larger number of agents, unconstrained by physical location or time.[79] In his white paper on digital twin technology in the manufacturing industry, Michael Grieves noted the following about the consequences of homogenization enabled by digital twins:[80]

In the past, factory managers had their office overlooking the factory so that they could get a feel for what was happening on the factory floor. With the digital twin, not only the factory manager, but everyone associated with factory production could have that same virtual window to not only a single factory, but to all the factories across the globe. (Grieves, 2014, p. 5)

Reprogrammable and smart

As stated above, a digital twin enables a physical product to be reprogrammable in a certain way. Furthermore, the digital twin is also reprogrammable in an automatic manner. Through the sensors on the physical product, artificial intelligence technologies, and predictive analytics,[81] A consequence of this reprogrammable nature is the emergence of functionalities. If we take the example of an engine again, digital twins can be used to collect data about the performance of the engine and if needed adjust the engine, creating a newer version of the product. Also, servitization can be seen as a consequence of the reprogrammable nature as well. Manufactures can be responsible for observing the digital twin, making adjustments, or reprogramming the digital twin when needed and they can offer this as an extra service.

Digital traces

Another characteristic that can be observed, is the fact that digital twin technologies leave digital traces. These traces can be used by engineers for example, when a machine malfunctions to go back and check the traces of the digital twin, to diagnose where the problem occurred.[82] These diagnoses can in the future also be used by the manufacturer of these machines, to improve their designs so that these same malfunctions will occur less often in the future.

Modularity

In the sense of the manufacturing industry, modularity can be described as the design and customization of products and production modules.[55] By adding modularity to the manufacturing models, manufacturers gain the ability to tweak models and machines. Digital twin technology enables manufacturers to track the machines that are used and notice possible areas of improvement in the machines. When these machines are made modular, by using digital twin technology, manufacturers can see which components make the machine perform poorly and replace these with better fitting components to improve the manufacturing process.

gollark: Mine is stored on my computer, and my parents have no understanding of computers, thus security?
gollark: Huh?
gollark: I have basically zero functioning longterm memory, you see.
gollark: ... yes.
gollark: idea: offload maths homework to gnobody, who likes it more.

References
  1. Saddik, A. El (April 2018). "Digital Twins: The Convergence of Multimedia Technologies". IEEE MultiMedia. 25 (2): 87–92. doi:10.1109/MMUL.2018.023121167. ISSN 1070-986X.
  2. "Minds + Machines: Meet A Digital Twin". Youtube. GE Digital. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  3. "Introduction to Digital Twin: Simple, but detailed". Youtube. IBM Watson Internet of Things. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
  4. Chhetri, Mohan Baruwal; Krishnaswamy, Shonali; Loke, Seng Wai (2004). Bussler, Christoph; Hong, Suk-ki; Jun, Woochun; Kaschek, Roland; Kinshuk; Krishnaswamy, Shonali; Loke, Seng Wai; Oberle, Daniel; Richards, Debbie (eds.). "Smart Virtual Counterparts for Learning Communities". Web Information Systems – WISE 2004 Workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 3307: 125–134. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30481-4_12. ISBN 9783540304814.
  5. Bacchiega, Gianluca. "Creating an Embedded Digital Twin: monitor, understand and predict Device Health Failure" (PDF). Inn4mech - Mechatronics and Industry 4.0 Conference Presentation - 2018.
  6. Indrawan, Maria; Ling, Sea; Smanchat, Sucha; Loke, Seng Wai (2008). "Formal Mirror Models: an Approach to Just-in-Time Reasoning for Device Ecologies". S2CID 18081020. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. Loke, S. W.; Thai, B. S.; Torabi, T.; Chan, K.; Deng, D.; Rahayu, W.; Stocker, A. (July 2015). "The La Trobe E-Sanctuary: Building a Cross-Reality Wildlife Sanctuary". 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Environments: 168–171. doi:10.1109/IE.2015.36. ISBN 978-1-4673-6654-0.
  8. "Azure Digital Twins". Microsoft. Microsoft. Retrieved 24 Sep 2018.
  9. "Digital twin to enable asset optimization". Smart Industry. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  10. "What Are Digital Twins And Why Will They Be Integral To The Internet Of Things?". ARC. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  11. Gautier, Philippe (2011). L'Internet des Objets... Internet, mais en mieux. France: AFNOR. ISBN 978-2-12-465316-4.
  12. Grieves, M. and J. Vickers, Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems, in Trans-Disciplinary Perspectives on System Complexity, F.-J. Kahlen, S. Flumerfelt, and A. Alves, Editors. 2016, Springer: Switzerland. p. 85-114.
  13. Glaessgen, Edward, and David Stargel. "The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles." 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA. 2012.
  14. Tao, Fei, et al. "Digital twin-driven product design framework." International Journal of Production Research (2018): 1-19.
  15. Bolton, Ruth N.; McColl-Kennedy, Janet R.; Cheung, Lilliemay; Gallan, Andrew; Orsingher, Chiara; Witell, Lars; Zaki, Mohamed (2018). "Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms". Journal of Service Management. 29 (5): 776–808. doi:10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0113.
  16. Söderberg, Rikard, et al. "Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production." CIRP Annals 66.1 (2017): 137-140.
  17. Bacchiega IRS srl, Gianluca (2017-06-01). "Embedded digital twin". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  18. "The Gemini Principles" (PDF). www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk. Centre for Digital Built Britain. 2018. Retrieved 2020-01-01.
  19. Gelernter, David Hillel (1991). Mirror Worlds: or the Day Software Puts the Universe in a Shoebox—How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195079067. OCLC 23868481.
  20. "Siemens and General Electric gear up for the internet of things". The Economist. 3 December 2016. That technology allows manufacturers to create what David Gelernter, a pioneering computer scientist at Yale University, over two decades ago imagined as 'mirror worlds'.
  21. Marr, Bernard (March 6, 2017). "What Is Digital Twin Technology - And Why Is It So Important?". Forbes.com. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  22. Thilmany, Jean (September 21, 2017). "Identical Twins". ASME. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  23. "Digital twins – rise of the digital twin in Industrial IoT and Industry 4.0". i-SCOOP. Retrieved 2019-09-11.
  24. Trancossi, Michele; Cannistraro, Mauro; Pascoa, Jose (2018-12-30). "Can constructal law and exergy analysis produce a robust design method that couples with industry 4.0 paradigms? The case of a container house". Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems. 5 (4): 303–312. doi:10.18280/mmep.050405. ISSN 2369-0739.
  25. Xu, Yan; Sun, Yanming; Liu, Xiaolong; Zheng, Yonghua (2019). "A Digital-Twin-Assisted Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Transfer Learning". IEEE Access. 7: 19990–19999. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890566. ISSN 2169-3536.
  26. Greengard, Samuel. "Digital Twins Grow Up". cacm.acm.org. Retrieved 2019-09-11.
  27. Grieves, M., Virtually Intelligent Product Systems: Digital and Physical Twins, in Complex Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, S. Flumerfelt, et al., Editors. 2019, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. p. 175-200.
  28. Piascik, R., et al., Technology Area 12: Materials, Structures, Mechanical Systems, and Manufacturing Road Map. 2010, NASA Office of Chief Technologist.
  29. "Shaping the Future of the IoT". YouTube. PTC. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  30. "On Track For The Future – The Siemens Digital Twin Show". YouTube. Siemens. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  31. "'Digital twins' could make decisions for us within 5 years, John Smart says". news.com.au. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  32. "Digital Twin for MRO". LinkedIn Pulse. Transition Technologies. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  33. Marr, Bernard. "What Is Digital Twin Technology – And Why Is It So Important?". Forbes. Forbes. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  34. Grieves, Michael. "Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication" (PDF). Florida Institute of Technology. Retrieved 24 March 2017.
  35. "GE Doubles Down On 'Digital Twins' For Business Knowledge". InformationWeek. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  36. "Device Shadows for AWS IoT – AWS IoT". docs.aws.amazon.com.
  37. "Digital Twin for SLM". YouTube. Transition Technologies. Retrieved 26 November 2015.
  38. "GE Oil & Gas 2017 Annual Meeting: 'Digital: Exploring what's possible' with Colin Parris". Youtube. GE Oil & Gas. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  39. Hallerbach, Sven; Xia, Yiqun; Eberle, Ulrich; Koester, Frank (3 April 2018). "Simulation-based Identification of Critical Scenarios for Cooperative and Automated Vehicles". SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1066. Retrieved 23 December 2018.
  40. Infosys Insights. "The Future For Industrial Services: Digital Twin" (PDF). Retrieved 15 March 2017.
  41. "The jet engine with 'digital twins'". BBC.com. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  42. TWI Ltd. "Lifecycle Engineering Asset Management Through Digital Twin Technology". www.twi-global.com. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  43. "How twinning tech will power our future". November 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  44. Bureau Veritas. "Digital technology to transform AIMS". Retrieved 15 March 2017.
  45. "Digital Twins elevate industrial asset performance". Control. Retrieved 26 July 2017.
  46. "Creating a Building's Digital Twin". Wired. November 2017. Retrieved 1 Feb 2017.
  47. "Is Your Utility GIS a Digital Twin — Or a Digital Mutant?". Energy Central. Retrieved 29 Aug 2018.
  48. Yang, Chen; Shen, Weiming; Wang, Xianbin (2018). "The Internet of Things in Manufacturing: Key Issues and Potential Applications". IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine. 4 (1): 6–15. doi:10.1109/MSMC.2017.2702391.
  49. Steer, Markus (May 2018). "Will There Be A Digital Twin For Everything And Everyone?". www.digitalistmag.com. Retrieved 2018-10-08.
  50. Tao, Fei; Cheng, Jiangfeng; Qi, Qinglin; Zhang, Meng; Zhang, He; Sui, Fangyuan (March 2017). "Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data". The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 94 (9–12): 3563–3576. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1.
  51. Parrot, Aaron; Warshaw, Lane (May 2017). "Industry 4.0 and the digital twin". Deloitte Insights.
  52. Porter, Michael; Heppelman, James (October 2015). "How smart, connected products are transforming companies". Harvard Business Review. 93: 96–114.
  53. "Digital twin technology and simulation: benefits, usage and predictions 2018". I-Scoop. 2017-11-11.
  54. "Industrial IoT: Rise of Digital Twin in Manufacturing Sector". Biz4intellia.
  55. Rosen, Roland; von Wichert, Georg; Lo, George; Bettenhausen, Kurt D. (2015). "About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing". IFAC-PapersOnLine. 48 (3): 567–572. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141.
  56. "How digital twins are revolutionizing industry". HannoverMesse.
  57. Ferguson, Stephen; Bennett, Edward; Ivashchenko, Artem (April 2017). "Digital twin tackles design challenges". World Pumps. 2017 (4): 26–28. doi:10.1016/S0262-1762(17)30139-6.
  58. NSW, Digital (25 February 2020). "NSW Digital win". Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  59. Lock, Oliver (25 February 2020). "HoloCity". doi:10.1145/3359997.3365734. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  60. Walker, Andy (7 December 2018). "Principles to guide development of national digital twin released". Infrastructure Intelligence. Retrieved 1 June 2020.
  61. Bruynseels, Koen; Santoni de Sio, Filippo; van den Hoven, Jeroen (February 2018). "Digital Twins in Health Care: Ethical Implications of an Emerging Engineering Paradigm". Frontiers in Genetics. 9: 31. doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00031. PMC 5816748. PMID 29487613.
  62. "Healthcare solution testing for future | Digital Twins in healthcare". Dr. Hempel Digital Health Network. December 2017.
  63. van Houten, Henk. "The rise of the digital twin: how healthcare can benefit". Philips.
  64. Baillargeon,..., Kuhl (2014). "The Living Heart Project: A robust and integrative simulator for human heart function". European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids. 48: 38–47. Bibcode:2014EJMS...48...38B. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.04.001. PMC 4175454. PMID 25267880.
  65. Sahli Costabal,..., Kuhl (2019). "Machine learning in drug development: Characterizing the effect of 30 drugs on the QT interval using Gaussian process regression, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification". Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 348: 313–333. Bibcode:2019CMAME.348..313S. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.01.033.
  66. Goh, Eng Lim (July 2018). "How Digital Twins of the Human Body Can Advance Healthcare". Hewlett Packard Enterprise.
  67. Reuters (September 2018). "Medical technology firms gets personal with 'Digital Twins'". Healthcare.Digital.
  68. "History". Sim&Cure.
  69. Yoo, Youngjin; Boland, Richard; Lyytinen, Kalle; Majchrzak, Ann (September–October 2012). "Organizing for innovation in the digitized world". Organization Science. 23 (5): 1398–1408. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771. JSTOR 23252314.
  70. Cearley, David W.; Burker, Brian; Searle, Samantha; Walker, Mike J. (3 October 2017). "The top 10 strategic technology trends for 2013" (PDF). Gartner Trends 2018: 1–24.
  71. Volkswagen. "The virtual twin". Volkswagen Inside. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  72. Volkswagen. "ow Volkswagen is Developing the Car of the Future Virtually". Volkswagen. Retrieved October 8, 2018.
  73. Tesla. "About". Tesla.
  74. The Economist. "Modern manufacturing's triple play: Digital twins, analytics and the internet of things". The Economist. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  75. Overton, Jerry; Brigham, JC. "DATA-DRIVEN SIMULATIONS INNOVATE THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS" (PDF). Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  76. Adner, Ron; Snow, Daniel (October 1, 2010). "Old technology responses to new technology threats: demand heterogeneity and technology retreats". Industrial and Corporate Change. 19 (5): 1655–1675. doi:10.1093/icc/dtq046.
  77. Vandermerwe, Sandra; Rada, Juan (Winter 1988). "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services". European Management Journal. 6 (4): 314–324. doi:10.1016/0263-2373(88)90033-3.
  78. Tilson, David; Lyytinen, Kalle; Sørensen, Carsten (December 2010). "Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda" (PDF). Information Systems Research. 21 (4): 748–759. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0318. JSTOR 23015642.
  79. Grieves, Michael; Vickers, John (17 August 2016). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. pp. 85–113. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4. ISBN 978-3-319-38754-3.
  80. Grieves, Michael. "Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. Retrieved from" (PDF).
  81. Hamilton, Dean (2017-08-25). "Seeing double: why IoT digital twins will change the face of manufacturing". Networkworld. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  82. Cai, Yi (2017). "Sensor Data and Information Fusion to Construct Digital-twins Virtual Machine Tools for Cyber-physical Manufacturing". Procedia Manufacturing. 10: 1031–1042. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.094.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.