Destry Rides Again (1932 film)
Destry Rides Again is a 1932 American pre-Code Western movie starring Tom Mix and directed by Benjamin Stoloff, about a man framed for a crime he didn't commit, who returns to wreak havoc following his release from prison. The movie was based on a novel by Max Brand. The supporting cast includes Claudia Dell, ZaSu Pitts, and Francis Ford.
Destry Rides Again | |
---|---|
film poster | |
Directed by | Benjamin Stoloff (billed as Ben Stoloff) |
Produced by | Carl Laemmle, Jr. Stanley Bergerman |
Written by | Max Brand (novel) Richard Schayer (adaptation) Robert Keith (dialogue) Isadore Bernstein (continuity) |
Starring | Tom Mix Claudia Dell ZaSu Pitts |
Cinematography | Daniel B. Clark |
Edited by | Arthur Hilton |
Distributed by | Universal Pictures |
Release date |
|
Running time | 94 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
The film has sometimes been retitled Justice Rides Again for television broadcasts, to avoid confusion with the 1939 film of the same name, with Marlene Dietrich and James Stewart. The latter, however, shares only the title; it is a completely different story that has no connection with Max Brand's novel.
Cast
- Tom Mix as Tom Destry
- Claudia Dell as Sally Dangerfield
- ZaSu Pitts as Temperance Worker
- Stanley Fields as Sheriff Jerry Wendell
- Earle Foxe as Tom Brent
- Edward Peil, Sr. as Frank Warren
- Francis Ford as Judd Ogden
- Fred Howard as Edward Clifton
- George Ernest as Willie
- Edward LeSaint as Mr. Dangerfield
- Charles K. French as Jury Foreman
- Harry Tenbrook as Barfly (uncredited)
gollark: What makes them better than the advertising companies then?
gollark: I am leaving off the second half so as not to fill more than a screen or so.
gollark: No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.
gollark: Oh, wait, better idea.
gollark: Hey, I *said* (GNU[+/])Linux, isn't that good enough for you, Stallman?!
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.