David Naugle

David Naugle is an author and professor. He is considered an expert on the Christian worldview.

Naugle is the head of the philosophy department at Dallas Baptist University. He is an ardent supporter of Neo-Calvinism, although he is not a 5-point Calvinist but rather a proponent of Amyraldism.[1]

Naugle started and currently directs a weekly lecture series at the university called the “Friday Symposium”. It features presentations by DBU's faculty, talented undergraduate and graduate students, and off-campus lecturers on a broad range of topics.

Naugle also started and teaches in the annual “Summer Institute for Christian Scholarship”. This is a ten-week faculty enrichment program for Dallas Baptist University's professors.

In the Spring of 2016 he took a temporary medical leave of absence from his current position at Dallas Baptist University.

Works

Naugle is the author of Worldview: The History of a Concept.[2] Christianity Today Magazine selected Worldview as the 2003 "Book of the Year" in the theology and ethics category.[3] The Peking University Press is translating "Worldview" into Chinese and has published it in 2006 he also wrote Reordered Loves, Reordered Lives: Learning the Deep Meaning of Happiness Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2008. His most recent work is Philosophy: A Student's Guide (Crossways 2012).

Education

Footnotes
  1. https://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/profile.php?id=889875713
  2. 'David K. Naugle Worldview: The History of a Concept Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002 ISBN 0-8028-4761-7
  3. Christianity Today Book Awards 2003
gollark: Even.
gollark: If it wasn't for the awful error handling, general attitude of distrust of the programmer, lol no generics, poor type system, bad dependency management, beelike syntax, channels, and claims of "simplicity", I might actually use Go, even!
gollark: Go has *some* things going for it, like the moderately fast compiler and extensive libraries.
gollark: Why would they not know about bee documentation book #35636?
gollark: I mean, you can have a system without... any optional dependency, yes.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.