DSMA-Notice

In the United Kingdom, a DSMA-Notice (Defence and Security Media Advisory Notice)[1] is an official request to news editors not to publish or broadcast items on specified subjects for reasons of national security. DSMA-Notices were formerly called a DA-Notice (Defence Advisory Notice), and before that called a Defence Notice (D-Notice) until 1993.

As of 2020, the system is still in use in the United Kingdom. A similar system was previously operational in Australia, but has fallen into disuse.

United Kingdom

In the UK the original D-Notice system was introduced in 1912 and run as a voluntary system by a joint committee headed by an Assistant Secretary of the War Office and a representative of the Press Association. Any D-Notices or DA-notices are only advisory requests and are not legally enforceable; hence, news editors can choose not to abide by them. However, they are generally complied with by the media.[2]

In 1971, all existing D-Notices were cancelled and replaced by standing D-Notices, which gave general guidance on what might be published and what was discouraged; and what would require further advice from the secretary of the Defence, Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee (DPBAC). In 1993, the notices were renamed DA-Notices (Defence Advisory Notices).

One of the recommendations resulting from the 2015 review of the DA-notice system included the renaming of the system to the Defence and Security Media Advisory (DSMA) Committee. This name reflected better the longstanding inclusion of the work of the intelligence agencies. In 2017, the notices were reworded and then reorganized into the following categories:

  • DSMA-Notice 01: Military Operations, Plans & Capabilities
  • DSMA-Notice 02: Nuclear and Non-Nuclear Weapon Systems and Equipment
  • DSMA-Notice 03: Military Counter-Terrorist Forces, Special Forces and Intelligence Agency Operations, Activities and Communication Methods and Techniques
  • DSMA-Notice 04: Physical Property and Assets
  • DSMA-Notice 05: Personnel and their Families who work in Sensitive Positions

According to an article in Defense Viewpoints, between 1997 and 2008 there were "30 occasions where the committee secretary has written to specific editors when a breach in the D-Notice guidelines is judged to have occurred".[3]

Known notable uses

In 1967, a political scandal known as the D-notice affair occurred, when Prime Minister Harold Wilson made an attack on the Daily Express newspaper, accusing it of breaching two D-notices which advised the press not to publish material which might damage national security. When the newspaper asserted it had not been advised of any breach, an inquiry was set up under a committee of Privy Counsellors. The committee found against the government, whereupon the government refused to accept its findings on the disputed article, prompting press outrage and the resignation of the Secretary of the D-notice committee.

It has been reported that in 1971, four days following the Baker Street robbery, a D-Notice was issued, requesting that reporting be discontinued for reasons of national security. It is claimed that some security boxes contained embarrassing or nationally sensitive material. However, an investigation some years later showed that a request had never been made to the D-Notice committee.[4] In fact, The Times newspaper was still reporting about the case over two months later.[5]

In 2004 and 2005, three blanket letters were sent to newspapers advising against publication of countermeasures used against roadside ambushes of British forces in the Iraq War.[3]

On 8 April 2009, the Committee issued a DA-Notice in relation to sensitive anti-terror documents photographed when Assistant Commissioner Bob Quick arrived at Downing Street for talks about current police intelligence.[6]

On 25 November 2010, the Committee issued a note to editors drawing attention to standing DA-Notices 1 and 5 in relation to sensitive documents expected to be released on the website WikiLeaks.[7][8][9][10]

In June 2013, a DA-Notice was issued asking the media to refrain from running stories on the US PRISM surveillance programme, and on British involvement therein.[11]

In October 2013, Prime Minister David Cameron made a veiled threat to newspapers over NSA and GCHQ leaks, stating in Parliament that the government might use "injunctions or D-notices or the other tougher measures" to restrain publication of leaked classified information if newspapers did not voluntarily stop publishing them.[12]

In 2017, a notice was issued to British journalists regarding revealing the author of a controversial dossier alleging collusion between Donald Trump and the Russian government during the 2016 presidential election.[13] Multiple British outlets ignored this advisory and revealed his name anyway, including BBC News, The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian.[13]

On 7 March 2018 and on 14 March 2018 two notices were issued to protect MI6 in relation to some aspects of the Skripal affair. In the early 1990s Sergei Skripal was recruited by Pablo Miller, the MI6 agent inside the UK embassy to Estonia in Tallinn. The MI6 officer under diplomatic cover in Moscow at this time was Christopher Steele. Miller was also the handler of Skripal after he went to jail and was released by Russia in a spy swap. Both lived in Salisbury. Steele and Miller worked for Orbis Business Intelligence which compiled the controversial Trump–Russia dossier, comprising 17 memos written in 2016 alleging misconduct and conspiracy between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Putin administration. While the precise nature of the relations between Skripal, Miller, and Steele were hidden, enough was already known to raise questions about Skripal's ongoing involvement with British intelligence.[14][15][16]

Australia

A voluntary system of D-Notices was also used in Australia starting in 1952 during the Cold War period; these were issued by the Defence, Press and Broadcasting Committee. At the first meeting of the Committee, eight D-Notices were issued covering atomic tests in Australia, aspects of naval shipbuilding, official ciphering, the number and deployment of Centurion tanks, troop movements in the Korean War, weapons and equipment information not officially released, aspects of air defence and certain aerial photographs.[17]

In 1974 the number of D-Notices was reduced to four, covering:[17]

  1. Technical information regarding navy, army and air force weapons, weapons systems, equipment and communications systems;
  2. Air operational capability and air defences;
  3. Whereabouts of Mr and Mrs Vladimir Petrov; and
  4. Ciphering and monitoring activities.

A fifth D-Notice relating to the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) was issued in 1977.[17]

In 1982 D-Notices were again revised to four.[18]

  • D Notice 1: Capabilities of the Australian Defence Force, Including Aircraft, Ships, Weapons, and Other Equipment;
  • D Notice 2: Whereabouts of Mr and Mrs Vladimir Petrov;
  • D Notice 3: Signals Intelligence and Communications Security; and
  • D Notice 4: Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS).

The Defence, Press and Broadcasting Committee has not met since 1982 although the D-Notice system remains the administrative responsibility of the Minister for Defence.[17] The D-Notice system fell out of common use at the end of the Cold War but remained in force. The 1995 Commission of Inquiry into the Australian Secret Intelligence Service reported that newspapers confessed ignorance that the D-Notice system was still operating when it was drawn to their attention in 1993 and 1994.[19]

On 26 November 2010, Australian Attorney-General Robert McClelland sent a letter to heads of Australian media and other organisations proposing the creation of a new system similar to the D-Notice system.[20] The proposed National Security Legislation Amendment Bill (2014) has been described as an extension of the D-Notice system that would subject journalists who reveal details of intelligence operations to criminal penalties.

The use of the D-Notice is demonstrated and referenced several times in the first episode of the Black Mirror television series. The episode is titled "The National Anthem" and within it the UK government imposes a D-Notice to try and stifle a controversial ransom demand that the (fictional) prime minister have sex with a pig to secure the release of a member of the royal family.

In the comic book series Transmetropolitan, a legally binding type of D-Notice is issued by the US President in an attempt to prevent the title character, gonzo journalist Spider Jerusalem, from exposing police corruption and a government-sponsored massacre.

The film Defence of the Realm illustrates the implications of the D-Notice protocols.

In the film The Bank Job MI-5 discusses issuing a D-Notice about sensitive photos stolen from a safe deposit box during a bank heist. .

gollark: Thus, domain suggestions?
gollark: Anyway, I wish to replace osmarks.tk™ with a shiny new domain for the 8th millenium gollarkic era™. One without the fear of it being randomly unexisted and on which I can actually change what the apex domain points to without weird DNS issues.
gollark: Potentially/
gollark: Sorry, ubq, not you.
gollark: Well, you know what they say, you apparently use an outdated version of Linux (4.19.0) with several known high-severity exploits.

See also

References
  1. http://www.dsma.uk
  2. "Standing DA Notices". Archived from the original on 2015-09-20. Retrieved 2015-09-02.
  3. Simon Roberts (2009-01-08). "D-Notices – UK's defence self censorship system".
  4. Duncan Campbell, Senior Correspondent, The Guardian, speaking on 'The Baker Street Robbery', DVD Group Inc production for Lionsgate Films Inc, 2008
  5. "£30,000 bail for man on bank raid charge." The Times (30 November 1971)
  6. Naughton, Philippe; Evans, Michael; Jenkins, Russell (2009-04-09). "Police chief Bob Quick resigns from the Met over terror blunder". The Times. London.
  7. "WikiLeaks: UK Government has issued a ..." Retrieved 2010-11-26. Wikileaks Twitter Feed
  8. Butselaar, Emily (2010-11-26). "Wikileaks: UK issues DA-Notice as US briefs allies on fresh leak". Index on Censorship. Retrieved 2010-11-26.
  9. "WikiLeaks And The Role Of The DA Notice System". Archived from the original on 2010-11-30. Retrieved 2010-11-27.
  10. order-order.com: "That wikileaks D-Notice" 26 Nov 2010
  11. Staines, Paul. "D-Notice, June 7, 2013". Retrieved 8 June 2013.
  12. Nicholas Watt, David Cameron makes veiled threat to media over NSA and GCHQ leaks, The Guardian (October 28, 2013).
  13. Cox, Joseph (12 January 2017). "UK Asks Journalists to Not Name Ex-Agent Allegedly Behind Trump Report". Motherboard. Vice News. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
  14. Borisov, Pavel (6 March 2018). "A hundred grand and hundreds of betrayed agents". Meduza. Retrieved 9 July 2019.
  15. Miller, David (8 May 2018). "Revealed: rebranded D-Notice committee issued two notices over Skripal affair". Spinwatch. Retrieved 9 July 2019.
  16. Hodge, Nathan; Shukla, Sebastian; Jordan, Carol; Ilyushina, Mary (9 March 2018). "Hospitalized Russian spy linked to Russia-UK spy wars". CNN. Archived from the original on 14 March 2018. Retrieved 9 July 2019.
  17. Sadler, Pauline (May 2000). "The D-Notice System". Australian Press Council News.
  18. "Fact sheet 49 – D Notices". National Archives of Australia. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011.
  19. Gordon J. Samuels and Michael H. Codd (1995), Report on the Australian Secret Intelligence Service - Commission of Inquiry into the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, Australian Government Publishing Service, pp. 114–115, ISBN 0-644-43201-2
  20. Stewart, Cameron (2010-11-26). "Attorney-General Robert McClelland urges media to accept security curbs". The Australian. Archived from the original on 2010-11-26. Retrieved 2010-11-26.
  21. Editorialists have dubbed this the "G-notice", as Google delivers notices to news publications that their articles cannot be indexed. Brendan O'Neill (2014-08-15). "Google: We must reverse the new tide of censorship sweeping Europe". The Telegraph.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.