Cute cat theory of digital activism

The cute cat theory of digital activism is a theory concerning Internet activism, Web censorship, and "cute cats" (a term used for any low-value, but popular online activity) developed by Ethan Zuckerman in 2008.[1][2] It posits that most people are not interested in activism; instead, they want to use the web for mundane activities, including surfing for pornography and lolcats ("cute cats").[3] The tools that they develop for that (such as Facebook, Flickr, Blogger, Twitter, and similar platforms) are very useful to social movement activists, who may lack resources to develop dedicated tools themselves.[3] This, in turn, makes the activists more immune to reprisals by governments than if they were using a dedicated activism platform, because shutting down a popular public platform provokes a larger public outcry than shutting down an obscure one.[3]

Lolcat images were often shared through the same networks used by online activists.

The Internet and censorship

Zuckerman states that "Web 1.0 was invented to allow physicists to share research papers. Web 2.0 was created to allow people to share pictures of cute cats."[3] Zuckerman says that if a tool passes "cute cat" purposes, and is widely used for low-value purposes, it can be and likely is used for online activism, too.[3]

If the government chooses to shut down such generic tools, it will hurt people's ability to "look at cute cats online", spreading dissent and encouraging the activists' cause.[2][3]

Chinese model

According to Zuckerman, internet censorship in the People's Republic of China, which relies on its own, self-censored, Web 2.0 sites, is able to circumvent the cute-cat problem because the government is able to provide people with access to cute-cat content on domestic, self-censored sites while blocking access to Western sites, which are less popular in China than in many other places worldwide.[3][4]

"Sufficiently usable read/write platforms will attract porn and activists. If there's no porn, the tool doesn't work. If there are no activists, it doesn't work well," Zuckerman has stated.[3]

gollark: I MAY have to improve gollariosity.
gollark: Actually, it doesn't.
gollark: I don't have that one.
gollark: ```(alt 842)(gollariosity 998)(grudger 1049)(devil 950)(mean-tit-for-tat 845)(tit-for-tat 1048)(angel 944)```
gollark: I added some extra stuff like "mean tit for tat" and "alternating" but now all has become bee?!

See also

References
  1. Shirky, Clay (2011-01-01). "The Political Power of Social Media". Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 2012-04-18.
  2. Shapiro, Samantha (2009-01-22). "Revolution, Facebook-Style". The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved 2012-04-24.
  3. "Bright Green: The Cute Cat Theory of Digital Activism". Worldchanging. Archived from the original on 2012-06-30. Retrieved 2012-04-18.
  4. Zuckerman, Ethan (2007-12-03). "Cute Cat Theory: The China Corollary". Retrieved 2012-04-24.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.