Crotaphatrema lamottei

Crotaphatrema lamottei, the Mount Oku caecilian or Lamotte's caecilian, is a species of caecilian in the family Scolecomorphidae. It is endemic to Mount Oku in Cameroon.[1][2][4] The specific name lamottei honours Maxime Lamotte, French biologist.[3][5] There is some doubt whether Crotaphatrema tchabalmbaboensis really is distinct from this species.[1][2][4]

Crotaphatrema lamottei

Critically Endangered  (IUCN 3.1)[1]
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Gymnophiona
Clade: Apoda
Family: Scolecomorphidae
Genus: Crotaphatrema
Species:
C. lamottei
Binomial name
Crotaphatrema lamottei
(Nussbaum, 1981)
Crotaphatrema lamottei is only known from Mount Oku, Cameroon
Synonyms[2]

Scolecomorphus lamottei Nussbaum, 1981[3]

Description

Males measure 143–281 mm (5.6–11.1 in) and adult females 262–325 mm (10.3–12.8 in) in total length. The mid-body width varies between 5.1 and 11.5 mm (0.20 and 0.45 in).[3][4] There are 115–129 primary annuli[4] that are incomplete ventrally. The eyes are not externally visible. The dorsum is tan-brown in preservative[3] and sienna brown and pale lilac in life.[4] The venter is cream. The lateral margins of the upper jaws and the area surrounding tentacular apertures are cream. The tip of the snout is tan-brown.[3]

Habitat and conservation

Crotaphatrema lamottei is found in secondary forest, forest edge, and farmland, but never further than 500 m (1,600 ft) away from forest. It occurs at about 2,300 m (7,500 ft) above sea level. It is assumed to be oviparous and not to depend on water bodies for reproduction.[1]

Crotaphatrema lamottei has a low population density and restricted distribution, although its exact range remains poorly mapped. Agriculture, grazing, fire, and forest fragmentation threaten natural habitats at Mount Oku, but it is not know how these changes affect this particular species. It is sometimes killed by local people, perhaps because of being confused with snakes. Some habitat at Mount Oku is protected.[1]

gollark: Well, yes, and since they can't really be treated the same way why just have one central "write to this" thing with differing behavior?
gollark: If you have a datagram socket thing, then the behavior will be different.
gollark: If you have a *stream*, you can safely write one byte at once (although this may be less efficient), and it's basically the same as writing in batches.
gollark: Which I think has some effects on the most efficient way to write/read them, hence more differences in treatment versus files.
gollark: I mean, an important implementation detail.

References
  1. IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (2015). "Crotaphatrema lamottei". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2015: e.T59649A16957270. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  2. Frost, Darrel R. (2020). "Crotaphatrema lamottei (Nussbaum, 1981)". Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.1. American Museum of Natural History. doi:10.5531/db.vz.0001. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  3. Nussbaum, Ronald A. (1981). "Scolecomorphus lamottei, a new caecilian from West Africa (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae)". Copeia. 1981 (2): 265–269. doi:10.2307/1444214. JSTOR 1444214.
  4. Doherty-Bone, Thomas M.; Ndifon, Roland Kebuh; San Mauro, Diego; Wilkinson, Mark; LeGrand, G. Nono; Gower, David J. (2011). "Systematics and ecology of the caecilian Crotaphatrema lamottei (Nussbaum) (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae)". Journal of Natural History. 45 (13–14): 827–841. doi:10.1080/00222933.2010.535921.
  5. Beolens, Bo; Watkins, Michael & Grayson, Michael (2013). The Eponym Dictionary of Amphibians. Pelagic Publishing. p. 130. ISBN 978-1-907807-42-8.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.