CrimeStat

CrimeStat is a crime mapping software program. CrimeStat is Windows-based program that conducts spatial and statistical analysis and is designed to interface with a geographic information system (GIS). The program is developed by Ned Levine & Associates under the direction of Ned Levine, with funding by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), an agency of the United States Department of Justice. The program and manual are distributed for free by NIJ.

1st-order and 2nd-order San Antonio robbery hot spots produced by CrimeStat Nnh routine.

CrimeStat performs spatial analysis on objects located in a GIS. The objects can be points (e.g., events, locations), zones (e.g., blocks, traffic analysis zones, cities) or lines (e.g., street segments). The program can analyze the distribution of the objects, identify hot spots, indicate spatial autocorrelation, monitor the interaction of events in space and time, and model travel behavior.

There is a regression module for non-linear spatial modeling. Some of its tools are specific to crime analysis. Others can by applied in many fields. There are 55 statistical routines in the program.

Development
'Head Bang' smoothing of Houston burglary rate produced by CrimeStat Head Bang interpolation routine.

CrimeStat has been developed since the mid-1990s under the direction of Ned Levine. The first prototype was a Unix-based C++ program called Pointstat that was developed to analyze motor vehicle crashes in Honolulu.[1][2] In 1996, the National Institute of Justice funded the first version of CrimeStat and the early Pointstat routines were folded into the program.

The first version (1.0) was released in August 1999: the latest version is 3.3 (July 2010).

  • Up to version 3.1, CrimeStat was programmed by Long Doan of Doan Consulting, Falls Church, VA.
  • Beginning at version 2.0, and solely from version 3.2, CrimeStat was programmed primarily by Haiyan Teng of Houston, TX.

Functionality

Data setup

CrimeStat can input data both attribute and GIS files but requires that all datasets have geographical coordinates assigned for the objects. The basic file format is dBase (dbf) but shape (shp), and Ascii text files can also be read. The program requires a Primary File but many routines also use a Secondary File. CrimeStat uses three coordinate systems: spherical (longitude, latitude), projected and directional (angles).

Distance can be measured as direct, indirect (Manhattan) or on a network (which also allows travel time or speed to be used). Distance units are decimal degrees for spherical coordinates and feet, meters, miles, kilometers, or nautical miles for projected coordinates. The program can create reference grids. Several routines also use the area of the geographical region for their calculations.

Statistical routines

The spatial description routines include:

  • Spatial distribution statistics (mean center, standard deviation ellipse, center of minimum distance, median center, directional mean, convex hull)
  • Spatial autocorrelation statistics for zonal data (Moran's I, Getis's G, Getis-Ord Global G, Moran correlogram, Geary correlogram, Getis-Ord correlogram),
  • Distance-based statistics among points (nearest neighbor analysis, Ripley's "K", the allocation and summation of Primary File points to Secondary File points, and various distance calculation matrices), and
  • Cluster analysis statistics for points, zones or lines. CrimeStat has a range of routines available for cluster identification:

Monte Carlo simulations can be run on many routines to estimate credible intervals.

The spatial modeling routines include:

Auto theft risk in Baltimore County produced by CrimeStat dual kernel density routine.
  1. Single kernel density interpolation for examining variation over a region of a single variable
  2. Dual kernel density interpolation of two variables (e.g., a set of events in relation to a population ‘at risk’)
  3. Head Bang routine for smoothing zonal data[3][4]
  4. ”Interpolated Head Bang surface that interpolates the Head Bang estimates to a grid
  5. ”Knox and Mantel indexes that identify the interaction between space and time in events
  6. Correlated Walk Analysis, based on random walk theory, for modeling the sequential behavior of a serial offender in space and time and makes a prediction about the next event
  7. Journey-to-crime analysis for modeling the likely origin of a serial offender based on the location of prior events committed by the offender (geographic profiling)
  8. Bayesian Journey-to-crime which is an empirical Bayes method that integrates the Journey-to-crime estimate with information on the residence location of other serial offenders who committed crimes in the same places to produce an updated estimate. The diagnostic routine compares this estimate with its components in predicting the residence location for multiple serial offenders[5][6]
  9. Bayesian Journey-to-crime estimation which applies the Bayesian Journey-to-crime method to estimate the location of one serial offender
  10. Spatial regression. The models include ordinary least squares, Poisson regression and various other generalized linear models for count data. In addition there are Markov chain Monte Carlo routines for fitting Poisson-Gamma and Poisson-Lognormal models, including where these have a conditional spatial autoregression (CAR or SAR) adjustment.

The Crime Travel Demand module models crime travel over a metropolitan area. It is an application of travel demand modeling to crime or other rare events.[7][8] The purpose is to calibrate the travel behavior of a large number of offenders in committing crimes as a basis for modeling alternative interventions by law enforcement[9][10]

Crime trips in Baltimore County produced by CrimeStat Crime Travel Demand module.

Output

CrimeStat has three different types of output:

  • Screen output that displays the results once the calculations are finished. These can be saved to a text file.
  • Non-graphical output for many routines in either dBase DBF or Ascii text format.
  • Graphical output for many routines to allow the calculated objects to be displayed in a GIS. Currently, the graphical output formats include Esri SHP, MapInfo Interchange Format (MIF/MID), Surfer for Windows DAT, and Ascii text formats.

Shortcomings

Unlike some other spatial statistics programs, CrimeStat has no mapping capabilities and must be used with GIS software. Some users have found that the GUI interface is difficult to understand and inconsistent between routines.

Because CrimeStat analyzes points in most routines, its results are not always consistent with those of software that analyzes areas (e.g. GeoDa). Finally, the size of the manual may be daunting to new users of spatial statistics.

Ancillary CrimeStat development

In addition to the development of the CrimeStat program, all the routines through version 2.0 plus the spatial autocorrelation routines have been converted into .NET libraries for use in third-party applications. Version 1.0 of the CrimeStat Libraries was released in August 2010 and is available on the CrimeStat web page.

Reviews and examples

Reviews and examples of CrimeStat in its application to crime analysis have been published.[11][12][13] Examples of the use of CrimeStat outside of crime analysis have also appeared.[14][15][16][17][18]

Use of CrimeStat by Baltimore County Police analysts

Baltimore County Police analysts use CrimeStat to perform various spatial analytics. The primary responsibility of police analysts in Baltimore County is to identify and address existing or anticipated crime problems. Police analysts use “hot spot analysis” in CrimeStat to identify areas within the county having high concentrations of crime. Another example demonstrating the use of CrimeStat involves the department's Data Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety (DDACTS).

Police analysts used Nearest Neighbor Hierarchical Spatial clustering to identify areas having high concentrations of crime and traffic accidents. Analysts found that the two cluster groups, crime and accidents, did tend to overlap in many areas of the county. The County's DDACTS program was initiated to increase police presence in the target areas. Preliminary results have been encouraging, with most targeted crimes and traffic accidents dropping in DDACTS areas.

The Department's DDACTS program has since become a model nationwide with the support of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Finally, police analysts have used CrimeStat's Journey to Crime and Bayesian Journey to Crime Estimation models to successfully identify a serial offender's activity space. Once an offender's activity space has been identified, police analysts will examine information captured from other police sources such as traffic stops, Field Interview Reports, and License Plate Readers to determine if a contact was made with a potential offender.

Police have also used CrimeStat's Crime Travel Demand model to identify road networks used by drivers under the influence (DUI). Roadways identified by the Crime Travel Demand model were targeted for interdiction programs by the department's DUI Enforcement Team. Similar weighted road networks have been used in conjunction with Journey to Crime models to improve identification of an offender's activity space.

gollark: Of course, the best way to communicate is through *lasers*. A laser going through your detection area during some amount of time is 1. No laser is 0. You can now very slowly send binary.
gollark: 7 bit/char 10Hz digital links.
gollark: I have actually written code for messaging over wireless redstone links. Not Morse code, though.
gollark: I used a chat box/recorder or something.
gollark: Very unreliable.

See also

References
  1. Levine, N. "Spatial statistics and GIS: software tools to quantify spatial patterns", Journal of the American Planning Association. 1996. 62 (3), 381-392.
  2. Levine, N., Kim, K. E., & Nitz, L. H. (1995). "Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: I. Spatial patterns". Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27 (5), 663-674.
  3. Mungiole, M. Pickle, L. W., & Simonson, K. H. (2002). Application of a weighted Head-Banging algorithm to Mortality data maps, Statistics in Medicine, 18, 3201-3209.
  4. Mungiole, M. & Pickle, L. W. (1999). Determining the optimal degree of smoothing using the weighted head banging algorithm on mapped mortality data, In ASC '99 Leading Survey & Statistical Computing into the New Millennium, Proceedings of the ASC International Conference, September. Archived 2010-05-27 at the Wayback Machine
  5. Levine, N. & Block, R. (2011). “Bayesian Journey to crime estimation: an improvement in geographic profiling methodology”. The Professional Geographer, 63(2), 1–17.
  6. JIP-OP (2009). Articles by Levine, N., Canter, D., Block, R., Bernasco, W., Leitner, M., Kent, J., Lee, P., and O’Leary, M., Special issue on Bayesian Journey-to-crime modeling. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6 (3).
  7. Hensher, D. A. & Button, K. J. (2002). Handbook of Transport Modeling. Elsevier Science: Cambridge, UK.
  8. Ortuzar, Juan de Dios and Luis G. Willumsen (2001). Modeling Transport (3rd edition). J. Wiley & Sons: New York.
  9. Levine, N. and Canter, P. (2011) "Linking origins with destinations for DWI Motor Vehicle Crashes: An application of crime travel demand modeling". Crime Mapping. In press.
  10. Levine, N. (2007), “Crime travel demand and bank robberies: Using CrimeStat III to model bank robbery trips”. Social Science Computer Review, 25(2), 239-258.
  11. Brodsky, H. (2002). “CrimeStat II on the geostatistical scene”. Geospatial Solutions, November. 49-53
  12. Paulsen, D. & Robinson, M. (2008).Spatial Aspects of Crime: Theory and Practice (2nd edition). Allyn & Bacon.
  13. Chainey, S. & Ratcliffe, J. (2005). GIS and Crime Mapping. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  14. Lai PC, Low CT, Wong M, Wong WC, & Chan MH. (2009). “Spatial analysis of falls in an urban community of Hong Kong”, International Journal of Health Geography, 17:8-14
  15. de Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Longley, P. A. (2007). Geospatial Analysis (second edition). The Winchelsea Press: Leicester, U.K.
  16. Anne van der Veen, A. (2005). “Economic hotspots: Visualizing Vulnerability to Flooding”, Natural Hazards, 36(1-2), 65-80.
  17. Anselin, L. (2003). “An Introduction to Point Pattern Analysis using CrimeStat”, GeoDa Center, Arizona State University: Tempe. http://geodacenter.asu.edu/system/files/points.pdf
  18. Clevenger, A. P., Chruszcz, B. & Gunson, K. E. (2001). “Highway mitigation fencing reduces wildlife-vehicle collisions”, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29(2),646-653.

Further reading
  • Levine, N. (2008). “CrimeStat: a spatial statistical program for the analysis of crime incidents”. Shekhar, S. and Xiong, H. (eds), Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science. Springer. 187-193.
  • Levine, N. (2006). “Crime mapping and the CrimeStat program. Geographical Analysis. 38 (1), 41-55.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.