China Railway Ürümqi Group
China Railway Ürümqi Group, officially abbreviated as CR Ürümqi or CR-Ürümqi, also known as CR Xinjiang, formerly, Ürümqi Railway Administration is a subsidiaries company under the jurisdiction of the China Railway (formerly the Ministry of Railway). It supervises the railway network within Xinjiang and Western Gansu. The railway administration was reorganized as a company on November 2017.[1]
State-owned enterprise | |
Industry | Railway operations |
Predecessor | Ürümqi Railway Administration |
Founded | 19 November 2017 |
Headquarters | 1 Hexi W Road, Xinshi, Ürümqi, Xinjiang, |
Area served | Xinjiang Western Gansu |
Owner | Government of China |
Parent | China Railway |
Website | Official Weibo Website |
China Railway Ürümqi Group | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simplified Chinese | 中国铁路乌鲁木齐局集团 | ||||||
Traditional Chinese | 中國鐵路烏魯木齊局集團 | ||||||
| |||||||
Ürümqi Railway Administration | |||||||
Simplified Chinese | 乌鲁木齐铁路局 | ||||||
Traditional Chinese | 烏魯木齊鐵路局 | ||||||
| |||||||
CR Ürümqi | |||||||
Simplified Chinese | 乌铁 | ||||||
Traditional Chinese | 烏鐵 | ||||||
|
Hub stations
- Ürümqi
- Ürümqi, Ürümqi South, Ürümqi West
- Korgas
- Korgas
- Alashankou
gollark: People somehow can't accept positive-sum games.
gollark: > A core proposition in economics is that voluntary exchanges benefit both parties. We show that people often deny the mutually beneficial nature of exchange, instead espousing the belief that one or both parties fail to benefit from the exchange. Across 4 studies (and 7 further studies in the Supplementary Materials), participants read about simple exchanges of goods and services, judging whether each party to the transaction was better off or worse off afterwards. These studies revealed that win–win denial is pervasive, with buyers consistently seen as less likely to benefit from transactions than sellers. Several potential psychological mechanisms underlying win–win denial are considered, with the most important influences being mercantilist theories of value (confusing wealth for money) and naïve realism (failing to observe that people do not arbitrarily enter exchanges). We argue that these results have widespread implications for politics and society.
gollark: (linking because I happened to read it recently)
gollark: But look at this: https://psyarxiv.com/efs5y/
gollark: I mean, *maybe* some behaviors make sense at population scale or in some bizarre game-theoretic way?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.