Cemetery (Silverchair song)

"Cemetery" is a single by the Australian alternative rock band Silverchair. The song is found on the band's second album Freak Show. It was also included on their Best of Volume 1.

"Cemetery"
Single by Silverchair
from the album Freak Show
ReleasedJune 1997
Recorded1996
GenreAcoustic rock, alternative rock
Length4:06
LabelMurmur
Songwriter(s)Daniel Johns
Producer(s)Nick Launay
Silverchair singles chronology
"Abuse Me"
(1997)
"Cemetery"
(1997)
"The Door"
(1997)

In their review for Freak Show, Rolling Stone called the song a "proggy" ballad.[1]

Background

"Cemetery" was originally composed by frontman Daniel Johns as a solo acoustic piece while still living at home. Originally, Johns had no intention of including it on a Silverchair album. In interviews, he revealed that he was initially apprehensive about presenting "Cemetery" even to his bandmates due to its soft and delicate nature, fearing that he would be ridiculed for creating a ballad. However, once Johns played the solo acoustic recording for his bandmates, they enjoyed it immensely, and Johns then felt confident enough to include it on Freak Show.

Covers

The song was covered by The Brave on the Silverchair tribute album Spawn (Again).[2]

Track listing

Australian CD single (MATTCD052)

  • 12" ltd. promo vinyl (MATTV052)
    • Ltd. cassette (MATT0052)
  1. "Cemetery"
  2. "Slab" (Nicklaunoise mix)
  3. "Cemetery" (acoustic)

European CD single (6645342)

  1. "Cemetery"
  2. "Freak (Remix for Us Rejects)"
  3. "Undecided"

Charts

Chart (1997) Peak
position
Australian Singles Chart[3] 5

Certifications

Region CertificationCertified units/sales
Australia (ARIA)[4] Gold 35,000^
gollark: ?news
gollark: Consequentialist-ly speaking (yes, I am aware you don't subscribe to this) a technological development could be "bad", if the majority of the possible uses for it are negative, or it's most likely to be used for negative things. To what extent any technology actually falls into that is a separate issue though.
gollark: You can show that 2 + 2 = 4 follows from axioms, and that the system allows you to define useful mathematical tools to model reality.
gollark: If you're going to say something along the lines of "see how it deals with [SCENARIO] and rate that by [OTHER STANDARD]", this doesn't work because it sneaks in [OTHER STANDARD] as a more fundamental underlying ethical system.
gollark: I don't see how you can empirically test your ethics like you can a scientific theory.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.