Canton of Nontron
The Canton of Nontron is a former canton of the Dordogne département, in France. It was disbanded following the French canton reorganisation which came into effect in March 2015. It consisted of 8 communes, which joined the canton of Périgord Vert Nontronnais in 2015.[1]
Nontron | |
|---|---|
Former canton | |
| Country | France |
| Region | Nouvelle-Aquitaine |
| Department | Dordogne |
| No. of communes | 15 |
| Disbanded | 2015 |
| Seat | Nontron |
| Area | |
| • Total | 266.31 km2 (102.82 sq mi) |
| Population (1999) | |
| • Total | 9,101 |
| • Density | 34/km2 (90/sq mi) |
The lowest point is 115 m in the commune of Javerlhac-et-la-Chapelle-Saint-Robert, the highest point is in Abjat-sur-Bandiat at 355 m, the average elevation is 197 m. The least populated commune is Connezac with 82 and the most populated commune is Nontron with 3,500.
Communes of Nontron
| Commune | Population (1999) | Postal code | INSEE code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abjat-sur-Bandiat | 624 | 24300 | 24001 |
| Augignac | 791 | 24300 | 24016 |
| Le Bourdeix | 229 | 24300 | 24056 |
| Connezac | 82 | 24300 | 24131 |
| Hautefaye | 116 | 24300 | 24209 |
| Javerlhac-et-la-Chapelle-Saint-Robert | 915 | 24300 | 24214 |
| Lussas-et-Nontronneau | 371 | 24300 | 24248 |
| Nontron | 3,500 | 24300 | 24311 |
| Saint-Estèphe | 619 | 24360 | 24398 |
| Saint-Front-sur-Nizonne | 135 | 24300 | 24411 |
| Saint-Martial-de-Valette | 790 | 24300 | 24451 |
| Saint-Martin-le-Pin | 305 | 24300 | 24458 |
| Savignac-de-Nontron | 187 | 24300 | 24525 |
| Sceau-Saint-Angel | 117 | 24300 | 24528 |
| Teyjat | 320 | 24300 | 24548 |
Population history
| Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 1962 | 9,398 |
| 1968 | 10,240 |
| 1975 | 9,885 |
| 1982 | 9,574 |
| 1990 | 9,435 |
| 1999 | 9,101 |
gollark: That sounds like it might be excessively expensive for stuff which doesn't actually happen all that often.
gollark: The transit files are a serialized datascript database or something and may be hard for other programs to read. Also, I think it mostly stores data in memory, so you wouldn't see your changes instantly.
gollark: If the probability of false positives is low relative to the number of possible keys, it's probably fine™.
gollark: I don't think you can *in general*, but you'll probably know in some cases what the content might be. Lots of network protocols and such include checksums and headers and defined formats, which can be validated, and English text could be detected.
gollark: But having access to several orders of magnitude of computing power than exists on Earth, and quantum computers (which can break the hard problems involved in all widely used asymmetric stuff) would.
See also
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.