CJK Compatibility Forms
CJK Compatibility Forms is a Unicode block containing vertical glyph variants for east Asian compatibility.
| CJK Compatibility Forms[1] Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF) | ||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| U+FE3x | ︰ | ︱ | ︲ | ︳ | ︴ | ︵ | ︶ | ︷ | ︸ | ︹ | ︺ | ︻ | ︼ | ︽ | ︾ | ︿ |
| U+FE4x | ﹀ | ﹁ | ﹂ | ﹃ | ﹄ | ﹅ | ﹆ | ﹇ | ﹈ | ﹉ | ﹊ | ﹋ | ﹌ | ﹍ | ﹎ | ﹏ |
Notes
| ||||||||||||||||
| CJK Compatibility Forms | |
|---|---|
| Range | U+FE30..U+FE4F (32 code points) |
| Plane | BMP |
| Scripts | Common |
| Assigned | 32 code points |
| Unused | 0 reserved code points |
| Source standards | CNS 11643 |
| Unicode version history | |
| 1.0.0 | 28 (+28) |
| 3.2 | 30 (+2) |
| 4.0 | 32 (+2) |
| Note: [1][2] | |
History
The following Unicode-related documents record the purpose and process of defining specific characters in the CJK Compatibility Forms block:
| Version | Final code points[lower-alpha 1] | Count | L2 ID | WG2 ID | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | U+FE30..FE44, FE49..FE4F | 28 | (to be determined) | ||
| 3.2 | U+FE45..FE46 | 2 | L2/99-238 | Consolidated document containing 6 Japanese proposals, 1999-07-15 | |
| N2092 | Addition of forty eight characters, 1999-09-13 | ||||
| L2/00-024 | Shibano, Kohji (2000-01-31), JCS proposal revised | ||||
| L2/00-098, L2/00-098-page5 | N2195 | Rationale for non-Kanji characters proposed by JCS committee, 2000-03-15 | |||
| L2/00-234 | N2203 (rtf, txt) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2000-07-21), "8.20", Minutes from the SC2/WG2 meeting in Beijing, 2000-03-21 -- 24 | |||
| L2/01-114 | N2328 | Summary of Voting on SC 2 N 3503, ISO/IEC 10646-1: 2000/PDAM 1, 2001-03-09 | |||
| 4.0 | U+FE47..FE48 | 2 | L2/99-353 | N2056 | "3", Amendment of the part concerning the Korean characters in ISO/IEC 10646-1:1998 amendment 5, 1999-07-29 |
| L2/99-380 | Proposal for a New Work item (NP) to amend the Korean part in ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993, 1999-12-07 | ||||
| L2/99-380.3 | Annex B, Special characters compatible with KPS 9566-97 (To be extended), 1999-12-07 | ||||
| L2/00-084 | N2182 | "3", Amendment of the part concerning the Korean characters in ISO/IEC 10646-1:1998 amendment 5 (Cover page and outline of proposal L2/99-380), 1999-12-07 | |||
| L2/99-382 | Whistler, Ken (1999-12-09), "2.3", Comments to accompany a U.S. NO vote on JTC1 N5999, SC2 N3393, New Work item proposal (NP) for an amendment of the Korean part of ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993 | ||||
| L2/00-066 | N2170 (pdf, doc) | "3", The technical justification of the proposal to amend the Korean character part of ISO/IEC 10646-1 (proposed addition of 79 symbolic characters), 2000-02-10 | |||
| L2/00-073 | N2167 | Karlsson, Kent (2000-03-02), Comments on DPRK New Work Item proposal on Korean characters | |||
| L2/00-285 | N2244 | Proposal for the Addition of 82 Symbols to ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000, 2000-08-10 | |||
| L2/00-291 | Everson, Michael (2000-08-30), Comments to Korean proposals (L2/00-284 - 289) | ||||
| N2282 | Report of the meeting of the Korean script ad hoc group, 2000-09-21 | ||||
| L2/01-349 | N2374R | Proposal to add of 70 symbols to ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000, 2001-09-03 | |||
| L2/01-387 | N2390 | Kim, Kyongsok (2001-10-13), ROK's Comments about DPRK's proposal, WG2 N 2374, to add 70 symbols to ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000 | |||
| L2/01-388 | N2392 | Kim, Kyongsok (2001-10-16), A Report of Korean Script ad hoc group meeting on Oct. 15, 2001 | |||
| L2/01-420 | Whistler, Ken (2001-10-30), "f. Miscellaneous symbol additions from DPRK standard", WG2 (Singapore) Resolution Consent Docket for UTC | ||||
| L2/01-458 | N2407 | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2001-11-16), Request to Korean ad hoc group to generate mapping tables between ROK and DPRK national standards | |||
| L2/02-372 | N2453 (pdf, doc) | Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2002-10-30), "T.12", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 42 | |||
| |||||
gollark: My dedicated server only has 4GB of RAM total, I'm afraid, and is busy with my personal MC server.
gollark: If you want something in this area I think the RX 550 (also AMD) is similar.
gollark: They do have passively cooled variants at least.
gollark: It's roughly equivalent to Ryzen APU graphics. And still bad.
gollark: Also, how would your Computron not be able to support GTX cards? Power connectors? GTX 1050 (Ti)s don't have those. If you do have a spare PCIe power connector go for an AMD RX 570.
See also
References
- "Unicode character database". The Unicode Standard. Retrieved 2016-07-09.
- "Enumerated Versions of The Unicode Standard". The Unicode Standard. Retrieved 2016-07-09.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.