C&R Clothiers
C&R Clothiers was a large chain of men's suit and furnishings stores based in Culver City, California. As of 1990 it had 67 stores across California.[1] The chain dates back to 1948.[2]
The company declared bankruptcy in 1996 and sold some of the stores to Men's Wearhouse,[3] which created a Value Priced Clothing division from both C&R Clothiers Inc. and the NAL chain.[4]
references
- "Men's Store Sued over Ads". The Hanford Sentinel. May 14, 1990. p. 14.
- "C&R Clothiers Advertisement". Pomona Progress-Bulletin. October 29, 1969. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
- Brooks, Nancy Rivera (November 14, 1996). "C&R; Clothiers Files Chapter 11, Plans to Sell Some Stores to Men's Wearhouse". Los Angeles Times.
- "The Mens Wearhouse history". Funding Universe. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
gollark: I mean, it's better than C and stuff, and I wouldn't mind writing simple apps in it.
gollark: Speaking specifically about the error handling, it may be "simple", but it's only "simple" in the sense of "the compiler writers do less work". It's very easy to mess it up by forgetting the useless boilerplate line somewhere, or something like that.
gollark: Speaking more generally than the type system, Go is just really... anti-abstraction... with, well, the gimped type system, lack of much metaprogramming support, and weird special cases, and poor error handling.
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
gollark: Oh, and the error handling is terrible and it's kind of the type system's fault.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.