Bump stock

Bump stocks or bump fire stocks are gun stocks that can be used to assist in bump firing. Bump firing is the act of using the recoil of a semi-automatic firearm to fire ammunition cartridges in rapid succession, but with a loss of accuracy.

A Slide Fire Solutions bump fire stock on a WASR-10 semiautomatic rifle

Bump fire stocks
A bump stock permits the trigger (red) to be held down when the receiver moves forward, being reset each round by receiver recoil. This allows semi-automatic firearms to somewhat mimic fully automatic weapons.

Bump fire stocks are gun stocks that are specially designed to make bump firing easier, which assist semi-automatic firearms with somewhat mimicking the firing motion of fully automatic weapons but does not make the firearm automatic.[1] Essentially, bump stocks assist rapid fire by "bumping" the trigger against one's finger (as opposed to one's finger pulling on the trigger) thus allowing the firearm's recoil, plus constant forward pressure by the non-shooting arm, to actuate the trigger. Bump fire stocks can be placed on a few common weapon platforms such as the AR or AK families. They can achieve rates of fire between 400 and 800 rounds per minute depending on the gun.[2] By 2018, bump fire stocks in the United States would sell for around $100 and up, with prices increasing prior to enactment of federal regulation.[2][3]

Slide Fire Solutions, the inventor, patent holder, and leading manufacturer of bump stocks, suspended sales after bump stocks were used in the 2017 Las Vegas shooting and resumed sales a month later.[4][5] On May 20, 2018, Slide Fire Solutions permanently halted sales and production of its products.[6]

History of regulation

In 2002, one of the first bump stock-type devices, the Akins Accelerator invented by Bill Akins, was deemed by the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to not be a "machinegun". The Akins Accelerator used an internal spring to force the firearm forward to re-make contact with the trigger finger after the recoil of the previous shot pushed the firearm rearward.[7][8] The ATF interpreted a "single function of the trigger" to mean a "single movement of the trigger", and since the trigger moved for each shot, the Akins Accelerator was deemed to not be a machinegun.[8] Later, in 2006, the ATF reversed course and reinterpreted the language to mean "single pull of the trigger", which reclassified the Akins Accelerator as a machinegun. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the new interpretation in February 2009.[9]

More modern bump stocks were invented by Slide Fire Solutions founder Jeremiah Cottle as a replacement stock for people who have limited hand mobility. Such bump stocks have no internal spring and require constant forward pressure by the non-shooting arm in order to maintain continuous fire.[8] Between 2008 and 2017, the ATF issued ten letter rulings that classified bump stocks as a "firearm part", which are unregulated.[10][11] However, in March 2018, as a result of the use of bump stocks in the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a plan to reclassify bump stocks as "machineguns" under existing federal law, effectively[Note 1] banning them nationwide.[12][13] Only two states had banned bump stocks prior to the Las Vegas shooting. The final rule of the DoJ was issued on December 18, 2018.[14][15] Now, as of March 26, 2019, bump stocks are illegal for almost all US civilians, but multiple lawsuits are pending that challenge that rule. In May 2019, the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 prohibited bump stocks in the UK.[16]

Public opinion

Recent polls show public support for a bump stock ban. Immediately following the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, 72% of registered voters supported a bump stock ban, including 68% of Republicans and 79% of Democrats.[17] A 2018 poll found 81% of American adults supported banning bump stocks with a margin of error of ±3.5%.[18] A different poll around the same time found 56% of American adults supported banning bump stocks with a margin of error of ±4%.[19]

Regulatory status in the United States

Federal

The ATF ruled in 2010 that bump stocks were not a firearm subject to regulation and allowed their sale as an unregulated firearm part.[2][20][21] In the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, twelve bump fire stock devices were found at the scene.[22] The National Rifle Association stated on October 5, 2017, "Devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations", and called on regulators to "immediately review whether these devices comply with federal law".[23] The 2017 shooting generated bipartisan interest in regulating bump stocks.[24] On October 4, 2017, Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced a bill to ban bump stocks,[2] but it was not acted upon. Instead, on February 20, 2018, President Trump instructed the ATF to issue regulations to treat bump stocks as machineguns.[25]

On March 23, 2018, the Department of Justice announced a plan to change the regulatory status of bump stocks. The proposed change would reclassify bump stocks as "machineguns" and effectively[Note 1] ban the devices in the United States under existing federal law.[12] A notice of proposed rulemaking was issued by the ATF on March 29, 2018, and opened for public comments.[13][26] Slightly more than 119,000 comments were submitted in support of the proposed rule, while slightly more than 66,000 comments expressed opposition to it.[15] On December 18, 2018, the final regulation to ban bump stocks was issued by the Department of Justice and published in the Federal Register on December 26.[10][15][27] The final rule states that "bump-stock-type devices" are covered by the Gun Control Act, as amended, which with limited exceptions, makes it unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machine-gun unless it was lawfully possessed prior to 1986. Since the bump-stock-type devices covered by this final rule were not in existence prior to 1986, they would be prohibited when the rule becomes effective.[15] The ban went into effect on March 26, 2019, by which owners of bump stocks were required to destroy them or surrender them to ATF, punishable by 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 fine.[15][28]

State
Legality of bump stocks in the United States at the state level; as of March 29, 2019, it became illegal at the federal level.
  Bump stocks legal
  Legality unclear
  Bump stocks illegal

Prior to the federal ban effective March 26, 2019, some states had taken action on their own to restrict ownership of the accessory. Since 1990, the sale of bump stocks has been illegal in California. They were banned in New York with the passage of the NY SAFE Act in 2013, and more explicitly banned in early 2019.[29] The device's legal status is unclear in Connecticut, Michigan, Minnesota, and Puerto Rico.[30]

After the 2017 Las Vegas shooting

In his final day as governor in January 2018, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed legislation making the gun accessory illegal in New Jersey.[31] Massachusetts banned bump stocks after the 2017 Las Vegas shooting.[5]

In March 2018, following the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, the state of Florida enacted SB 7026, which, among other things, banned bump stocks.[32][33] The portion of the legislation banning bump stocks took effect in October 2018; possession in Florida is a third-degree felony.[34] Vermont passed a similar law in 2018, which went into effect in October 2018; possession in Vermont is a misdemeanor.[35] Delaware,[36] Hawaii,[37] Maryland,[38] Washington,[39] Washington D.C.,[40] and Nevada[41] have also banned bump stocks.

Some states that do not ban bump stocks may have localities that ban them, such as Northbrook, Illinois (April 2018);[42] Boulder, Colorado (May 2018);[43] and others.

Federal lawsuits

Several gun rights groups have challenged federal regulation.[44][45]

Gun Owners of America

In December 2018, Gun Owners of America filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Western Michigan seeking an preliminary injunction against the ban.[46] On March 21, 2019, that request was denied by the district court.[47] On March 25, 2019, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an injunction and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court[48][49] which denied the request on March 28.[50] The case is currently pending before the Sixth Circuit on the merits.[51]

Guedes, Codrea, Firearms Policy Coalition

The Firearms Policy Coalition and other groups sued in the U.S. District Court of District of Columbia, also seeking an injunction.[52] In February 2019, the District Court denied the Firearms Policy Coalition request for an injunction, determining that the group had not put forward convincing legal arguments that the ban was invalid.[52][53] On March 23, 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay of the effective date of the regulation that applies only to the plaintiffs.[54] On March 25, 2019, the court clarified that its stay also applies members of the plaintiff organizations (Firearms Policy Coalition, Madison Society Foundation, and Florida Carry).[55] A broader injunction was denied by the Supreme Court.[56] On April 1, 2019, the Appeals Court denied a preliminary injunction in a per curiam decision with a noted dissent, based largely on Chevron deference, and allowed the ban to go into effect for the plaintiffs.[8] On April 3, 2019, a second stay application was submitted to the Supreme Court[57] but was denied on April 5, 2019.[58][59] A petition for Supreme Court review on the merits was rejected on March 2, 2020.[60]

Aposhian

A lawsuit by the Utah Shooting Sports Council was filed in the U.S. District Court of Utah.[61][62] A preliminary injunction was denied on March 15, 2019[63][64] but the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary stay on March 21, 2019 that applies only to the plaintiff.[65][66] On April 30, 2019, in a divided opinion, the Tenth Circuit denied the motion for a stay. The case is currently pending before the Tenth Circuit on the merits.[67][68][69]

Class action for compensation

A lawsuit was filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims seeking just compensation for individuals being deprived of their bump stocks.[70]

Michael Cargill

A lawsuit was filed on March 25, 2019 in the U.S. District Court of Western Texas.[71][72][73]

The Modern Sportsman

A lawsuit was filed on March 29, 2019 in the Court of Federal Claims by The Modern Sportsman and RW Arms.[74][75]

Patent infringement suit

Slide Fire Solutions filed suit against Bump Fire Systems for infringement of its patents on bump stock designs in 2014.[76] The suit alleged that Bump Fire Systems infringed eight US Patents, for example, United States Patent No. 6,101,918 entitled "Method And Apparatus for Accelerating the Cyclic Firing Rate of a Semi-Automatic Firearm"[77] and United States Patent No. 8,127,658 entitled "Method of Shooting a Semi-Automatic Firearm".[78] The suit was settled in 2016, resulting in Bump Fire Systems ceasing manufacture of the product in contention.[79]

Other lawsuits

Survivors of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting sued bump stock patent holder and manufacturer Slide Fire Solutions, claiming the company was negligent and that they deliberately attempted to evade U.S. laws regulating automatic weapons: "this horrific assault would not and could not have occurred, with a conventional handgun, rifle, or shotgun, of the sort used by law-abiding responsible gun owners for hunting or self defense."[6] The suit was dismissed in September 2018; the court determined that the bump stocks of the sort used by gunman Stephen Paddock to commit the murders, were "firearm components" rather than "firearm accessories" and were therefore subject to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), a federal law immunizing manufacturers and sellers of firearms from liability for harm "caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse firearm products".[80][81]

gollark: So was radium.
gollark: That's no longer very cool™.
gollark: "Drugs" are poorly defined. Caffeine is drugs. Alcohol is drugs and oddly popular despite its badness.
gollark: To be fair, the lasers are apparently only to confuse the missiles' tracking systems, not destroy them.
gollark: Yes.

See also

Note
  1. Machineguns manufactured after 1986 are illegal on the federal level, but pre-1986 ones remain legal in most states and are highly regulated. Since bump stocks were not invented until 2010, all existing supplies effectively become illegal if classified as a machinegun.

References
  1. Chavez, Nicole. "Bump stock: The device found on Las Vegas shooter's guns". CNN. Retrieved 6 October 2017.
  2. "The "bump stocks" used in the Las Vegas shooting may soon be banned". The Economist. 6 October 2017.
  3. Berr, Jonathan. "Bump stock prices soar ahead of potential federal ban". CBS News. CBS News. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
  4. Mann, Brian (7 November 2017). "Bump Stock Manufacturer To Resume Sales Of Controversial Device". All Things Considered. NPR. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  5. Lartey, Jamiles (7 November 2017). "Leading bump stock maker briefly makes product available again". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  6. Romo, Vanessa (18 April 2018). "Bump Stock Manufacturer Is Shutting Down Production". NPR. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  7. "Inventor of 'bump stock' spent years fighting for device, and lost". Reuters. 6 October 2017. Retrieved 1 April 2019.
  8. "GUEDES v. ATF" (PDF).
  9. "Akins v. US".
  10. "Bump-Stock-Type Devices". Federal Register. 26 December 2018. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
  11. Hsu, Tiffany (5 October 2017). "Bump Stock Innovator Inspired by People Who 'Love Full Auto'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
  12. "Sessions effectively bans bump stocks". Axios. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
  13. Horwitz, Sari (23 March 2018). "Justice Department proposes banning bump stocks, branding them machine guns". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
  14. "US officially bans 'bump stocks' on guns". BBC News. 19 December 2018. Retrieved 19 December 2018.
  15. Savage, Charlie (18 December 2018). "Trump Administration Imposes Ban on Bump Stocks". New York Times.
  16. "54 - Prohibition of certain firearms etc: England and Wales and Scotland". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 24 June 2019.
  17. Sanger-Katz, Margot; Bui, QuocTrung (12 October 2017). "A Bump Stock Ban Is Popular With the Public". Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  18. Khalid, Asma (2 March 2018). "NPR Poll: After Parkland, Number of Americans Who Want Gun Restrictions Grows". Morning Edition. NPR. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  19. "Poll: Support for stricter gun laws rises; divisions on arming teachers". CBS News. 23 February 2018. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  20. Krouse, William J. (10 October 2017). Gun Control: "Bump-Fire" Stocks (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
  21. Peck, Sarah Herman (11 April 2018). ATF’s Ability to Regulate "Bump Stocks" (PDF). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  22. "What Is a Bump Stock and How Does It Work?". The New York Times. 20 February 2018 [October 4, 2017].
  23. "Las Vegas shooting: NRA urges new rules for gun 'bump-stocks'". BBC News. 5 October 2017. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
  24. Connolly, Griffin (5 October 2017). "House GOP Shows 'Overwhelming' Interest in Bipartisan Bump Stock Bill". Rollcall.com.
  25. Carter, Brandon (20 February 2018). "Trump to take steps to ban bump stocks". The Hill. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  26. "Regulations.gov". Regulations.gov. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
  27. Bump-Stock-Type Devices, 83 Fed. Reg. 66,514 (Dec. 26, 2018).
  28. Owen, Tess (26 March 2019). "Owning a bump stock can now get you 10 years in prison". Vice News. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
  29. Wang, Vivian; McKinley, Jesse (29 January 2019). "New York Passes First Major Gun Control Bills Since Sandy Hook". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  30. "Where are bump-fire stocks illegal? Feds, states weigh bans after Las Vegas shooting". CBS News.
  31. "N.J. bans gun device used in Las Vegas shooting after Christie signs bill". NJ.com.
  32. "Florida Senate passes bill raising age to buy guns". CNN. Athena Jones, Darran Simon and Carolyn Sung. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  33. "The NRA sued to block Florida's new gun law hours after it was passed". Vox. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
  34. Sampson, Zachary T. (8 February 2018). "Bump stocks have been banned for months in Florida, but is anyone listening?". Tampa Bay Times.
  35. McCullum, April (24 September 2018). "Vermont gun laws: What to know about new bump stock ban". Burlington Free Press.
  36. "Delaware's bump stock ban to take effect after buyback events". WHYY. Retrieved 22 November 2018.
  37. "Hawaii lawmakers pass bump stock ban". Associated Press. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
  38. "Ban On 'Bump Stocks' Among New Gun Regulations In Maryland". WAMU. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
  39. "Inslee signs bill to ban bump stock devices like those used in the Las Vegas shooting". Office of Governor Jay Inslee. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
  40. "DC Council approves stronger gun laws". WUSA. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
  41. "Nevada Gov. Sisolak signs gun control bill into law". Las Vegas Review-Journal. 14 June 2019. Retrieved 16 June 2019.
  42. Kukulka, Alexandra. "Northbrook bans bump stocks throughout village, concealed carry in businesses where alcohol consumed". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
  43. Gstalter, Morgan (17 May 2018). "Boulder City Council votes to ban assault-style weapons". TheHill. Retrieved 24 June 2018.
  44. Balsamo, Michael (18 December 2018). "Trump administration moves to ban bump stocks". Associated Press. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  45. "Gun Rights Activists Are Already Suing Over Trump's Bump Stock Ban". BuzzFeed News. 18 December 2018.
  46. Martin, Gary (28 December 2018). "Gun lobby files lawsuit challenging Trump's bump stock ban". Las Vegas Review-Journal.
  47. "MI Order Denying Motion | Statutory Interpretation | Chevron U.S.A." Scribd. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  48. "Round 1: District Court sides with government against gun owners | Gun Owners of America". Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  49. Daniels, Jeff (25 March 2019). "Trump administration's bump stock ban set to go into effect Tuesday". www.cnbc.com. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  50. "U.S. Supreme Court refuses to block Trump's gun 'bump stock' ban". Reuters. 28 March 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
  51. Shapiro, Ilya; Blackman, Josh; June 25, Matthew Larosiere; 2019 (25 June 2019). "Gun Owners of America v. Barr". Cato Institute. Retrieved 27 June 2019.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  52. Flynn, Meagan (26 February 2018). "Bump-stock ban enacted by Trump administration can stand, federal judge rules". Washington Post.
  53. Shapiro, Ilya; Blackman, Josh; March 8, Matthew Larosiere; 2019 (8 March 2019). "Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives". Cato Institute. Retrieved 27 June 2019.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  54. "Stay Order" (PDF).
  55. "Order on Modfication Clarification". Scribd. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  56. "BumpstockCase.com - Bumpstock Lawsuit - Guedes v. BATFE". Firearms Policy Coalition. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  57. "Guedes v. ATF stay application" (PDF).
  58. "Docket for 18A1019". www.supremecourt.gov. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  59. Thomsen, Jacqueline (5 April 2019). "Supreme Court rejects bid from gun rights groups to delay bump stock ban". TheHill. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
  60. "Docket for 19-296". www.supremecourt.gov. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  61. EST, Jenni Fink On 1/17/19 at 10:04 AM (17 January 2019). "Gun rights advocate sues Trump administration over bump stock ban". Newsweek. Retrieved 14 March 2019.
  62. "Aposhian v. U.S." (PDF).
  63. "Judge denies Utah gun enthusiast's attempt to block federal rule banning bump stocks". www.ksl.com. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  64. "Federal judge denies Utah gun enthusiast's attempt to halt the upcoming deadline on bump stock ban". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  65. Imlay, Ashley (21 March 2019). "Utah gun enthusiast granted temporary stay of bump stock ban". DeseretNews.com. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
  66. "Temporary Stay" (PDF).
  67. "Aposhian v. Barr, et al. | New Civil Liberties Alliance". nclalegal.org. Retrieved 27 June 2019.
  68. Shapiro, Ilya; Blackman, Josh; June 13, Matthew Larosiere; 2019 (13 June 2019). "Aposhian v. Barr". Cato Institute. Retrieved 27 June 2019.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  69. "Docket for Aposhian v. Barr, 19-4036 - CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Retrieved 17 October 2019.
  70. Maher, Ann. "Bump-stock class action seeks compensation for government's 'taking' of property". madisonrecord.com. Retrieved 14 March 2019.
  71. "Gun rights activist Michael Cargill files lawsuit, surrenders bump stocks". KXAN. 25 March 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  72. Flores, Christian (25 March 2019). "With bump stock ban taking effect, Austin man plans on fighting ATF in court". KEYE. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  73. "Cargill v. Barr et al Complaint | New Civil Liberties Alliance". nclalegal.org. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  74. "Largest Bump Stock Supplier, RW Arms, Announces Lawsuit Against United States Government". RW Arms. 9 April 2019. Retrieved 30 November 2019.
  75. Anapol, Avery (9 April 2019). "Gun company sues US over bump stock ban, claiming $20M in losses". TheHill. Retrieved 30 November 2019.
  76. Case 3:14-cv-03358-M Document 1 Filed 09/16/14, retrieved 3 October 2017
  77. US patent 6101918, William Akins, "Method and apparatus for accelerating the cyclic firing rate of a semi-automatic firearm", published Aug 15, 2000, assigned to William Akins
  78. US patent 8,127,658, Jeremiah Cottle, "Method of shooting a semi-automatic firearm", published March 6, 2012, assigned to Slide Fire Solutions, Inc.
  79. "Slide Fire Solutions forces Bump Fire Systems Out Of Business", Guns.com
  80. Las Vegas Bump Stock Class Action Dismissed, Courthouse News Service (September 18, 2018).
  81. Order, Prescott v. Slide Fire Solutions, LP, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, September 17, 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.