Brazil International
The Brazil International, also known as São Paulo International, is the most important international open badminton tournament of Brazil. It is held since the year 1984. Brazilian National Badminton Championships started in 1991.
Past winners
International Challenge
No. | Year | Men's singles | Women's singles | Men's doubles | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 1984 | |||||
II | 1985 | no competition | no competition | |||
III | 1987 | |||||
IV | 1989 | |||||
V | 1990 | |||||
VI | 1991 | |||||
VII | 1992 | |||||
VIII | 1993 | |||||
IX | 1994 | |||||
X | 1995 | |||||
XI | 1996 | |||||
XII | 1997 | |||||
XIII | 1998 | |||||
XIV | 1999 | |||||
XV | 2000 | |||||
XVI | 2001 | |||||
XVII | 2002 | |||||
XVIII | 2003 | |||||
XIV | 2004 | |||||
XX | 2005 | |||||
XXI | 2006 | |||||
XXII | 2007 | |||||
XXIII | 2008 | |||||
XXIV | 2009 | |||||
XXV | 2010 | |||||
XXVI | 2011 | |||||
XXVII | 2012 | |||||
XXVIII | 2013 | |||||
XXIX | 2014 | |||||
XXX | 2015 | |||||
XXXI | 2016 | |||||
XXXII | 2017 | |||||
XXXIII | 2018 | |||||
XXXIV | 2019 | |||||
International Series
Year | Men's singles | Women's singles | Men's doubles | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | |||||
2020 | Cancelled[note 1] |
- This tournament, originally to be played from 14 to 18 October, was later postponed due to COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.
Future Series
Year | Men's singles | Women's singles | Men's doubles | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 |
Performances by nation
Top Nations | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Nation | MS | WS | MD | WD | XD | Total | ||
1 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 10 | 59 | |||
2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 7.5 | 5 | 24.5 | |||
3 | 5 | 1 | 7.5 | 3 | 16.5 | ||||
4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3.5 | 4 | 15.5 | |||
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | ||||
6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||||
8 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
9 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 3.5 | |||||
10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||
13 | 1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | ||||||
14 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
18 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
30 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||||||
Total | 36 | 36 | 36 | 35 | 32 | 175 |
gollark: Why does Wikipedia not just have an option to intersect arbitrary lists?
gollark: > Some may argue that the CDC originally claimed that masks were ineffective as a way to retain the already-small supply of masks for healthcare providers and medical officials. Others may argue that the CDC made this claim due to ever-developing research around the virus. I am arguing, however, that the CDC made the claim that masks are ineffective because the CDC’s sole purpose is to provide scientific legitimation of the U.S. as a eugenicist project through medical genocide. As outlined in this essay, the CDC has a history of releasing deadly information and later backtracking on it when the damage has already been done.
gollark: > Choosing to tell the public that supplies that could benefit everyone is ineffective, rather than calling for more supplies to be created—in the midst of a global pandemic, no less—is eugenics. Making the conscious decision to tell the general public that something is ineffective when you have not done all of the necessary research, especially when medical officials are using the very same equipment, is medical and scientific genocide.
gollark: It seems like they seem to claim they're genociding *everyone*, actually?
gollark: Are you familiar with relativistic magnetoapiodynamics?
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.