Brachypnoea

Brachypnoea is a genus of leaf beetles in the subfamily Eumolpinae. It is mostly found in the Neotropical realm, though there are also eight known species in the Nearctic realm.[5][6][7][8]

Brachypnoea
Brachypnoea
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Coleoptera
Family: Chrysomelidae
Subfamily: Eumolpinae
Tribe: Eumolpini
Genus: Brachypnoea
Gistel, 1848[1]
Type species
Colaspis tristis
Olivier, 1808
Synonyms[2]

The genus was originally named Noda, named by Chevrolat in Dejean's Catalogue in 1836. However, this was preoccupied by Noda Schellenberg, 1803, a genus in Diptera. Two replacement names were made for Noda: Brachypnoea, by Gistel in 1848, and Nodonota by Édouard Lefèvre in 1885. Since Brachypnoea was published first, it has priority over Nodonota.[2]

Species

These species belong to the genus Brachypnoea:[5][7][6][9][10][11]

  • Brachypnoea acuminata (Lefèvre, 1885)[4]
  • Brachypnoea acutangula (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea angulicollis (Lefèvre, 1876)
  • Brachypnoea arbustorum Bechyné & Bechyné, 1961[12]
  • Brachypnoea argentiensis (Jacoby, 1904)
  • Brachypnoea atra (Harold, 1875)
    • Brachypnoea atra adequata (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
    • Brachypnoea atra atra (Harold, 1875)
    • Brachypnoea atra dislocata (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
    • Brachypnoea atra mosqueya Bechyné, 1997[14]
  • Brachypnoea aurulenta (Lefèvre, 1876)
  • Brachypnoea balyi (Jacoby, 1878)
  • Brachypnoea basalis (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea bebedera (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea bella (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea bicallosa (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea boggianii (Jacoby, 1899)
    • Brachypnoea boggianii boggianii (Jacoby, 1899)
    • Brachypnoea boggianii laplatensis (Bechyné, 1954)[15]
  • Brachypnoea bogotana (Harold, 1874)
  • Brachypnoea boliviana (Jacoby, 1899)
  • Brachypnoea bowdichi (Bechyné, 1949)
  • Brachypnoea callosa (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea carpintera (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea chalcea (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea chontalensis (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea clypealis (Horn, 1892)[17]
  • Brachypnoea colaspisformis (Bechyné, 1949)
  • Brachypnoea colonensis (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea columbina (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea congregata (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea consonaria (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea convexa (Say, 1824)
  • Brachypnoea coroicensis (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea costipennis (Lefèvre, 1875)
  • Brachypnoea cretifera (Lefèvre, 1875)
  • Brachypnoea cribellata (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea cupriceps (Lefèvre, 1877)[18]
  • Brachypnoea cyanella (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea cyanescens (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea denticollis (Jacoby, 1899)
  • Brachypnoea dispersa (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea distincta (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea doryphthalma (Bechyné, 1954)[15]
    • Brachypnoea doryphthalma doryphthalma (Bechyné, 1954)
    • Brachypnoea doryphthalma quimensis Bechyné, 1958[19]
  • Brachypnoea edura (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea elongata (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea eulina Bechyné & Bechyné, 1961[12]
  • Brachypnoea exilis (Erichson, 1848)
    • Brachypnoea exilis debilis Bechyné, 1997[14]
    • Brachypnoea exilis exilis (Erichson, 1848)
    • Brachypnoea exilis grita (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
    • Brachypnoea exilis propinqua (Lefèvre, 1875)[14]
    • Brachypnoea exilis tuberculata (Lefèvre, 1875)
  • Brachypnoea fallaciosa (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea fastidita (Jacoby, 1899)
  • Brachypnoea filicornis (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea floricola (Bechyné, 1949)
  • Brachypnoea freyi (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea fulvicornis (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea grenadensis (Jacoby, 1897)
  • Brachypnoea hondurensis (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea humeralis (Latreille, 1833)[14]
  • Brachypnoea humlis (Erichson, 1848)
  • Brachypnoea igneicollis (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea imitans (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea insignis (Lefèvre, 1885)[4]
  • Brachypnoea interrupta (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea irazuensis (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea junonis (Bechyné, 1952)[20]
  • Brachypnoea laeta (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea laevicollis (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea landolti (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea lateralis (Jacoby, 1881)
    • Brachypnoea lateralis jaliscensis (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
    • Brachypnoea lateralis lateralis (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea lecontei E. Riley, S. Clark & Seeno, 2003
  • Brachypnoea lefevrei (Jacoby, 1878)
    • Brachypnoea lefevrei boucardi (Jacoby, 1878)[13]
    • Brachypnoea lefevrei lefevrei (Jacoby, 1878)
  • Brachypnoea longicornis (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea lugens (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea luteipes (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea margaretae (Schultz, 1980)[21]
  • Brachypnoea medellina (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea meligethoides (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea meridensis (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea metallica (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea micromela (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea mimas (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea minuta (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea miribella (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea mixiollensis (Bechyné, 1954)[15]
  • Brachypnoea modesta (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
    • Brachypnoea modesta animatoria (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
    • Brachypnoea modesta modesta (Lefèvre, 1878)
    • Brachypnoea modesta parvula (Jacoby, 1890)[13]
  • Brachypnoea moerens (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea moesta (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea nana (Klug, 1829)
  • Brachypnoea nicandra (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea nigra (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea obliterata (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea ocanana (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea opaca (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea opacicollis (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea ovoidea (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea palmarensis (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea paraensis Bechyné & Bechyne, 1961[22]
  • Brachypnoea peregrina (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea phryna (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea piccolina Bechyné & Bechyné, 1964[23]
  • Brachypnoea placida (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea plumbea (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea puncticollis (Say, 1824) (rose leaf beetle)
  • Brachypnoea purpureosericea (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea pustulata (Harold, 1874)
  • Brachypnoea rotundicollis (Schaeffer, 1906)[24]
  • Brachypnoea ruficornis (Lefèvre, 1885)[4]
  • Brachypnoea rufipes (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea rufula (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea scheerpelzi (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea scutellaris (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea secondaria (Bechyné, 1951)
    • Brachypnoea secondaria secondaria (Bechyné, 1951)
    • Brachypnoea secondaria sculptithorax (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea selenaria (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea semicostata (Lefèvre, 1875)
  • Brachypnoea seminigra (Lefèvre, 1891)[25]
  • Brachypnoea sermyla (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea sinuata (Jacoby, 1890)
  • Brachypnoea spinulosa (Lefèvre, 1885)[4]
  • Brachypnoea strangulata (Bechyné, 1951)
  • Brachypnoea subcylindrica (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea sylvana (Bechyné, 1953)[9]
  • Brachypnoea tarsata (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea texana (Schaeffer, 1919)[26]
  • Brachypnoea theobromae (Bryant, 1924)[27]
  • Brachypnoea tricostulata (Lefèvre, 1875)
  • Brachypnoea tristis (Olivier, 1808)
  • Brachypnoea unicostata (Jacoby, 1881)
  • Brachypnoea varicornis (Weise, 1921)[3]
  • Brachypnoea venustula (Lefèvre, 1878)
  • Brachypnoea violaceipennis (Jacoby, 1878)
  • Brachypnoea virginia (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea virgulata (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea viridis (Jacoby, 1878)
  • Brachypnoea vulnerata Bechyné & Bechyne, 1961[22]
  • Brachypnoea wanda (Bechyné, 1954)[28]
  • Brachypnoea weyrauchi (Bechyné, 1955)[13]
  • Brachypnoea winkerli (Lefèvre, 1878)[16]
  • Brachypnoea wygodzinskyi (Bechyné, 1949)
  • Brachypnoea zita (Bechyné, 1954)[28]

Species moved to Dryadomolpus:[14]

Synonyms:

  • Brachypnoea sp. on sunflower
gollark: No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.
gollark: Oh, wait, better idea.
gollark: Hey, I *said* (GNU[+/])Linux, isn't that good enough for you, Stallman?!
gollark: Yep!
gollark: Also, though this is more personal preference, (GNU[+/])Linux (distributions) has (have):- a package manager useful for general use (the windows store is not really this)- a usable shell (yes, I'm aware you can use WSL, but it's not very integrated with everything else)- lower resource use- a nicer UI (well, the option for one; AFAIK Windows does not allow as much customization)

References
  1. Bezděk, J. (2020). "Review of the genus-level names proposed by Johannes Gistel in Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera)". Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae. 60 (1): 173–188. doi:10.37520/aemnp.2020.011.
  2. Flowers, R. W.; Furth, D. G.; Thomas, M. C. (1994). "Notes on the Distribution and Biology of Some Florida Leaf Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)". The Coleopterists Bulletin. 48 (1): 79–89. JSTOR 4009002.
  3. Weise, J. (1921). "Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der schwedischen entomologischen Reise des Herrn Dr. A. Roman in Amazonas 1914—1915. 6. Chrysomelidae". Arkiv för Zoologi. 14 (1): 1–205.
  4. Lefèvre, É. (1885). "Eumolpidarum hucusque cognitarum catalogus, sectionum conspectu systematico, generum sicut et specierum nonnullarum novarum descriptionibus adjunctis". Mémoires de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège. 2. 11 (16): 1–172.
  5. "Brachypnoea Report". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 2018-03-14.
  6. "Browse Brachypnoea". Catalogue of Life. Retrieved 2018-03-14.
  7. "Brachypnoea Overview". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2018-03-14.
  8. "Brachypnoea Genus Information". BugGuide.net. Retrieved 2018-03-14.
  9. Bechyné, J. (1953). "Katalog der neotropischen Eumolpiden (Col. Phytoph. Chrysomeloidea)". Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey (in German). 4: 26–303.
  10. Chaboo, Caroline S.; Flowers, R. Wills (2015). "Beetles (Coleoptera) of Peru: A Survey of the Families. Chrysomelidae: Eumolpinae Hope, 1840". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 88 (3): 375–379. doi:10.2317/kent-88-03-375-379.1.
  11. Flowers, R.W. (1996). "The subfamily Eumolpinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Central America". Revista de Biología Tropical Special Publication. 2: 1–59. Retrieved December 31, 2018.
  12. Bechyné, J.; Springlovà de Bechyné, B. (1961). "Notas sobre Chrysomeloidea neotropicais" (PDF). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi N.S. 33: 1–49.
  13. Bechyné, J. (1955). "Reise des Herrn G. Frey in Sudamerika: Eumolpidae" (PDF). Entomologischen Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey. 6: 569–657.
  14. Bechyné, J. (1997). Savini, V. (ed.). "Evaluación de los datos sobre los Phytophaga dañinos en Venezuela (Coleoptera). Parte I" (PDF). Boletín de Entomología Venezolana. Serie Monografias. 1: 1–278.
  15. Bechyné, J. (1954). "La liste des Eumolpides de Rio Grande do Sul (Brésil) et observations diverses sur les espéces néotropicales" (PDF). Arquivos do Museu Paranaense. 10: 141–226. (note: pages 196–199 are missing in the PDF)
  16. Lefèvre, E. (1878). "Voyage de M. E. Steinheil à la Nouvelle Grenade. Eumolpides". Mittheilungen des Münchener Entomologischen Vereins. 2: 112–133.
  17. Horn, G. H. (1892). "The Eumolpini of Boreal America". Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 19: 195–234. JSTOR 25076581.
  18. Lefèvre, E. (1877). "Descriptions de coléoptères nouveaux ou peu connus de la famille des Eumolpides (1re partie)". Annales de la Société Entomologique de France. 5. 7: 115–166.
  19. Bechyné, J. (1958). "Notizen zu den neotropischen Chrysomeloidea (Col. Phytophaga)" (PDF). Entomologischen Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey. 9: 478–706.
  20. Bechyné, J. (1952). "Deuxieme note sur les Eumolpide Neotropicaus des collections de l'Institut Royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique" (PDF). Bulletin Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique. 28: 1–20.
  21. Schultz, W. T. (1980). "A New Species of Nodonota (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with a Review of the United States Species". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 73 (2): 200–203. doi:10.1093/aesa/73.2.200.
  22. Bechyné, J.; Springlovà de Bechyné, B. (1961). "Notas sobre Chrysomeloidea Neotropicais II" (PDF). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi N.S. 37: 1–93.
  23. Bechyné, J.; Springlovà de Bechyné, B. (1964). "Notes sur quelques Chrysomeloidea Néotropicaux (Col. Phytophaga)" (PDF). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 11: 117–137.
  24. Schaeffer, C. (1906). "On new and known genera and species of the family Chrysomelidae". Brooklyn Institute Museum Science Bulletin. 1 (9): 221–253. hdl:2027/mdp.39015031364543.
  25. Lefèvre, E. (1891). "Descriptions d'espèces nouvelles de Clytrides et d'Eumolpides". Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique. 35: CCXLVIII–CCLXXIX.
  26. Schaeffer, C. (1919). "Synonymical and other notes on some species of the family Chrysomelidae and descriptions of new species". Journal of the New York Entomological Society. 27 (4): 307–340. JSTOR 25003871.
  27. Bryant, G. E. (1924). "New Species of Phytophaga". Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 9. 13 (75): 299–304. doi:10.1080/00222932408633045.
  28. Bechyné, J. (1954). "Uber die in Matto Grosso von F. Plaumann gesammelten Chrysomeloidea (Col. Phytophaga)" (PDF). Entomologischen Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey. 5: 116–133.
  29. Bechyné, J. (1967). "Notes sur les Phytophaga neotropicaux (Coleoptera)" (PDF). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (Maracay). 4: 5–47.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.