Battle of Mons-en-Pévèle

The Battle of Mons-en-Pévèle (or Pevelenberg) was fought on 18 August 1304 between the French and the Flemish. The French were led by King Philip IV "the Fair" in person.

Battle of Mons-en-Pévèle
Part of the Franco-Flemish War

The Battle of Mons-en-Pévèle, by Charles Philippe Larivière (1839)
Date18 August 1304
Location
Mons-en-Pévèle, County of Flanders
(Modern France)
Result Decisive French victory [1]
Treaty of Athis-sur-Orge[1]
Belligerents
Kingdom of France County of Flanders
Commanders and leaders
Philip IV
Foulques du Merle		 William of Jülich  †
Philip of Chieti
John I of Namur
Strength
3,000 Knights[2]
10,000 Infantry[2]		 12,000–15,000[3]
Casualties and losses
1,800[4]–7,000[5] 7,000–8,000[5]

Prelude

The French King wanted revenge for the defeat in Battle of the Golden Spurs in 1302, after which the Flemish had retaken Douai and Lille. By the beginning of 1304, the French king was ready to attack the Flemish rebels. While the French army, led by the king himself and Foulques du Merle, marched north to attack William of Julich's force, the French navy sailed to Zeeland to unite with the army of Hainault and Holland. It was this combined northern force in Zeeland which struck the first blow on 10–11 August 1304 when it soundly defeated Guy of Namur's army and navy at the Battle of Zierikzee; Guy was captured and the Flemish conquest of Holland was halted.[6]

Philip of Chieti, son of Guy, Count of Flanders, had gathered a strong Flemish army to stop the French invasion and taken up positions on the Pévèle hill.

The battle

After a day of fighting the outcome was undecided and negotiations were opened between 17:00 and 18:30. When a French force under Guy de Saint-Pol tried to surround the Flemish, he was pushed back. Now the furious Flemish decided to launch a frontal attack, and surprised the French, who thought the battle was over for the day.

The Flemish had reached the royal tent, attacking King Philip IV of France. He only escaped because some knights around him covered his flight, paying for this act with their lives.[7] Assisted with mounting his horse, Philip counterattacked, but had his horse killed under him.[8] By then William of Jülich was killed in a counterattack that Philip had managed to launch.[9]

As only the Flemish right wing had attacked, and the left wing under John I, Marquis of Namur was already leaving the battlefield,[7] the Flemish right wing also withdrew.

The French chose not to pursue the Flemish.

During the Flemish attack on Philip, the oriflamme, a hugely symbolic and significant flag, was lost.[3]

Aftermath

Both sides claimed victory: but the French remained in possession of the battlefield and forced a Flemish retreat. The French also conquered Douai and Orchies and burned down Seclin.

After further minor battles, eventually the Treaty of Athis-sur-Orge was signed on 23 June 1305 which recognized Flemish independence, at the cost of the cities of Lille, Douai and Béthune,[5] which were transferred to France, and the paying of exorbitant fines to King Philip IV.

Notes
  1. Curveiller 1989, p. 34.
  2. DeVries 2006, p. 34.
  3. DeVries 2006, p. 35.
  4. Verbruggen 1997, p. 203.
  5. DeVries 2006, p. 33.
  6. DeVries 2006, p. 32.
  7. DeVries 2006, p. 40.
  8. DeVries 2006, p. 41.
  9. DeVries 2006, p. 44.
gollark: Their 117-million-parameter mind is too small to contain true gollariosity.
gollark: No, this is merely mgollark's insanity showing.
gollark: > The only thing I can do is use C, but it's not like Rust is particularly excellent and amazing.OH BEE OH BEE IT NEEDS RETRAINING
gollark: > , yes.<|endoftext|>It's a shame that many languages have weird implicit typing.<|endoftext|>The only thing I can do is use C, but it's not like Rust is particularly excellent and amazing.<|endoftext|>The language is very hostile to abstraction and stuff, as far as I know.<|endoftext|>I think it's a good way to write C.<|endoftext|>It was a good job of some kind to push the language to write C.<|endoftext|>We had that one yesterday, yes.<|endoftext|>It is not a good reason to write C.<|endoftext|>Apparently the actual language is now overcrowded because of its 900-letter TLDs.<|endoftext|>It's a shame that the platform doesn't match the original definition you want to use the actual *C*.<|endoftext|>No, it's a *c*.<|endoftext|>It would be better if it used actual definition of `set shell.<|endoftext|>What?<|endoftext|>https://github.com/dangr/fastcNONE are safe from gollarious emulation.
gollark: This is a flawless method of comparing information density, yes, before you ask.

References
  • Curveiller, Stephane (1989). Dunkerque, ville et port de Flandre à la fin du Moyen âge: à travers les comptes de bailliage de 1358 à 1407. Presses Univ. Septentrion.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • DeVries, Kelly (2006). Infantry Warfare in the Early Fourteenth Century: Discipline, Tactics, and Technology. The Boydell Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Six, Georges (1905). "La bataille de Mons-en-Pévèle (18 août 1304)". Annales de l'Est et du Nord. 1 (2).CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Verbruggen, J. F. (1952). "De slag bij de Pevelenberg". Bijdragen voor de geschiedenis der Nederlanden. 6: 169–98.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Verbruggen, J. F. (1997). The Art of Warfare in Western Europe During the Middle Ages: From the Eighth Century to 1340. The Boydell Press.
  • Verbruggen, J. F. (2002) [1952]. The Battle of the Golden Spurs: Courtrai, 11 July 1302 (rev. ed.). Woodbridge: Boydell Press. ISBN 0-85115-888-9.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.