Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth

Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (No 1)[1] – most commonly known as Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth and also referred to as The Airlines Case or the ANA Case – was a High Court of Australia decision. The case dealt with limits of the powers of the Australian Federal Government under sections 51 and 92 of the Australian Constitution. The outcome of the case was that the Federal Government could found a federally owned airline, but it could not hinder private sector competition with that airline.

Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (No 1)
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Decided14 December 1945
Citation(s)[1945] HCA 41, (1945) 71 CLR 29
Case history
Subsequent action(s)Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (No 2) [1946] HCA 10, (1946) 71 CLR 115
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingLatham CJ, Rich, Starke, Dixon & Williams JJ

Background

In mid-1945, the Labor Federal Government of Prime Minister Ben Chifley introduced a bill into the House of Representatives that would have the effect of nationalising interstate Airlines in Australia.[2] At the time, Australian National Airways ("ANA") was the dominant domestic carrier in Australia.[2] After the bill received Royal Assent as the "Australian Airlines Act (1945)",[3] it was immediately challenged by ANA in the High Court in its "original jurisdiction" as arbiter of Constitutional Law. ANA argued that the Act was in breach of sections 51 and 92 of the Constitution.[2]

Decision

The High Court, per curiam, found that while nationalised enterprises could be established, ss 51 and 92 did not empower the Commonwealth to acquire pre-existing enterprises (in this case, an airline).[2][1][4] ANA then sought to apply for a certificate under Section 74 of the Constitution of Australia to appeal to the Privy Council for a judgment on further restriction of Commonwealth powers. That application was denied in Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (No 2).[5]

gollark: Because getting them down is quite hard sometimes?
gollark: I have been mysteriously inspired to strand some kerbals in space today.
gollark: I'm going to send it back to HCS-03.
gollark: There are extremely good reasons the [[ REDACTED ]] are in containment.
gollark: SERIOUSLY‽ Why do you keep DOING this sort of thing?

See also

References
  1. Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (No 1) [1945] HCA 41, (1945) 71 CLR 29 (14 December 1945).
  2. Galligan, Brian (1987). "4". Politics of the High Court. University of Queensland Press.
  3. "milestones" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2010.
  4. Zines, Leslie. "Federal Constitutional Power Over the Economy". Australian National University. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
  5. Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (No 2) [1946] HCA 10, (1946) 71 CLR 115 (17 April 1946).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.