Argiolestinae
Argiolestinae is a subfamily of damselflies. They belong to the flatwing damselfly family, Argiolestidae. Like their relatives but unlike damselflies of other families, they usually spread their hindwings horizontally when resting. It is the largest subfamily in Argiolestidae, making up almost three-quarters of the family's species, found primarily in Australia, New Guinea, and New Caledonia.[1][2]
Argiolestinae | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Sydney Flatwing | |
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Arthropoda |
Class: | Insecta |
Order: | Odonata |
Suborder: | Zygoptera |
Superfamily: | Calopterygoidea |
Family: | Argiolestidae |
Subfamily: | Argiolestinae Fraser, 1960 |
Genera
The following genera are placed in the Argiolestinae:[2][3][4]
- Archiargiolestes Kennedy, 1925
- Argiolestes Selys, 1862
- Austroargiolestes Kennedy, 1925
- Caledargiolestes Kennedy, 1925
- Caledopteryx Kennedy, 1925
- Celebargiolestes Kennedy, 1925
- Eoargiolestes Kalkman & Theischinger, 2013
- Griseargiolestes Theischinger, 1998
- Luzonargiolestes Kalkman & Theischinger, 2013
- Metagrion Calvert, 1913
- Miniargiolestes Theischinger, 1998
- Podopteryx Selys, 1871
- Pyrrhargiolestes Kalkman & Theischinger, 2013
- Solomonargiolestes Kalkman & Theischinger, 2013
- Trineuragrion Ris, 1915
- Wahnesia Förster, 1900
Footnotes
- Dijkstra, Klaas‐Douwe B.; Kalkman, Vincent J.; Dow, Rory A.; Stokvis, Frank R.; et al. (2014). "Redefining the damselfly families: a comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Zygoptera (Odonata)". Systematic Entomology. 39: 68–96. doi:10.1111/syen.12035.
- Kalkman, Vincent J.; Theischinger, Gunther (2013). "Generic revision of Argiolestidae (Odonata), with four new genera". International Journal of Odonatology. Taylor & Francis. 16 (1): 1–52. doi:10.1080/13887890.2012.749450.
- "Odonata Central". Retrieved 2019-05-17.
- "World Odonata List". Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound. 2018. Retrieved 2019-05-17.
![]() |
Wikispecies has information related to Argiolestinae |
gollark: (if each receiver gets all the messages, it'll have to try and decrypt all of them)
gollark: Well, if you like, stick them on the same channel. I don't think it matters much for anything but making receivers do marginally less work (trying to) decrypt all the messages.
gollark: Is that relevant?
gollark: Ummm... I'd go for making the channel name (part of) the hash of the key or something.
gollark: ... What do you do with the modem version right now?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.