Anthomastus

Anthomastus is a genus of soft corals in the family Alcyoniidae.[2]

Anthomastus
Anthomastus species
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Cnidaria
Class: Anthozoa
Order: Alcyonacea
Family: Alcyoniidae
Genus: Anthomastus
Verrill, 1878
Species[1]
See text

Species

Species in the genus include:

  • Anthomastus aberrans (Thomson & Henderson, 1906)
  • Anthomastus agaricoides (Thomson & Henderson, 1906)
  • Anthomastus agaricus Studer, 1890
  • Anthomastus agassizii Verrill, 1922
  • Anthomastus antarcticus Kükenthal, 1910
  • Anthomastus bathyproctus Bayer, 1993
  • Anthomastus canariensis Wright & Studer, 1889
  • Anthomastus giganteus Tixier-Durivault, 1954
  • Anthomastus globosus d'Hondt, 1992
  • Anthomastus grandiflorus Verrill, 1878
  • Anthomastus granulosus Kükenthal, 1910
  • Anthomastus gyratus Molodtsova, 2013
  • Anthomastus hicksoni Bock, 1938
  • Anthomastus muscarioides Kükenthal, 1910
  • Anthomastus purpureus (Koren & Danielssen, 1883)
  • Anthomastus rylovi Naumov, 1952
  • Anthomastus tahinodus d'Hondt, 1988
  • Anthomastus zealandicus Benham, 1928
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
gollark: What's the alternative? Science is at least *slightly* empirical and right. Also, the video is wrong.
gollark: Fast video encoding is less space-efficient and/or worse quality.
gollark: Because you're wrong, obviously. More data → more good.

References
  1. "WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Anthomastus Verrill, 1878". Retrieved 26 September 2014.
  2. "WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Anthomastus Verrill, 1878". Retrieved 26 September 2014.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.