Aging out

Aging out is American popular culture vernacular used to describe anytime a youth leaves a formal system of care designed to provide services below a certain age level.

There are a variety of applications of the phrase throughout the youth development field.[1] In respect to foster care, aging out is the process of a youth transitioning from the formal control of the foster care system towards independent living. It is used to describe anytime a foster youth leaves the varying factors of foster care, including home, school and financial systems.[2] The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services defines an "aging out" case as, "a situation referring to a person's petition to become a permanent legal resident as a child, and in the time that passes during the processing of the application, the child turns 18 and ages out.[3]

Usage

Often used to highlight the problems traditional foster care approaches face, aging out affects foster youth in a variety of ways. An estimated 30,000 adolescents age out of the foster care system each year in the United States.[4]

Aging Out is also used in reference to Drum Corps International's rules which state that drum corps' members above the age of 18-to-21 are denied the ability to compete in World Class.

Former Foster Youth in Education

Children who grow up in foster care have lower rates of completion when it comes to high school and higher education. Using the PRISMA methodology (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),Gypen et al. (2017) gathered articles from various electronic bases such as PsychINFO, Springer, Science Direct, and Google Scholar and searched the terms “Foster care” or “ Foster alumni” or “foster children” and “long-term perspectives” or “long-term results.”[5] The studies included participants aged 17 years and older (no age cap) gathering data from family service systems and child protective systems.

Dworsky & Courtney (2009) found that in child protective systems, only 64% had completed high school by the age of 19 [6] and Pecora, Williams et al. (2006) found that by the age of 29, 85% had completed high school or completed a GED.[7] Those in family service systems had a 45%  of students completing a high school diploma, which compared to the general population of 73%, is considerably low.[7] By the age of 23, that number increased to 73%, which is closer to the 83% of those not in foster care.[5] Jackson & Cameron (2012) found similar findings. By the age of 18 only 33% had a high school diploma and by the age 24, that number grew to 73%.[8] Gypen et al. (2017) suggests that this means that if given more time, children who grew in foster care, have a higher chance of getting a high school diploma or GED.[5]

When it comes to higher education, research has found the number of students completing a two year, four year, or masters program to be even lower than high school completion rates.[5]  They also found that during the first year of college, children who age out of foster care were two times more likely to drop out,[9] although there are indications that women have better outcomes than men (Naccarato et al. 2010).[10] Pecora, Williams et al. (2006) found that 42.7% started education after high school but by the age of 25, only 9.6% were still enrolled.[7] For those in the family service system, only 7.2% completed their bachelor’s and by the age of 23, only 1% had a Master’s degree.[5]

Naccarato et al. (2010) suggested a buddy system to help foster students through their educational journey, just like families provide similar support systems for those students not in foster care.[10]

Statistics

The Child Welfare League of America reports that as many as 36% of foster youth who have aged out of the system become homeless, 56% become unemployed, and 27% of male former foster youth become jailed.[11] The San Francisco Chronicle reports that less than half of emancipated youth who have aged out graduate from high school, compared to 85% of all 18- to 24-year-olds; fewer than 1 in 8 graduate from a four-year college; two-thirds had not maintained employment for a year; fewer than 1 in 5 was completely self-supporting; more than a quarter of the males spent time in jail; and 4 of 10 had become parents as a result of an unplanned pregnancy.[12]

Responses

In 1970, Title X of the Public Health Service Act started providing for the federal family planning program, designed to provide resources for health services and counseling to low-income or uninsured individuals who may otherwise lack access to health care, including young people aging out of foster care. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development's Family Unification Program, or FUP, provides Housing Choice Vouchers to young people aging out of the foster care system.

The Administration for Children's Services, or ACS, and the federal Office of Housing Policy and Development, in cooperation with the New York City Housing Authority, has a Section 8 Priority Code for young people aging out of the foster care system.[11]

In 1999, President Clinton signed the Foster Care Independence Act, which doubled federal funding for independent living programs and provides funding for drug abuse prevention and health insurance for former foster care youth until age 21.[13]

Now programs and laws such as the CFCIP—the Chafee Foster Care Independence Program—are starting to make headway into ways to compensate foster children who have become adults. $140 million is to be funded for this program including states matching 20%.[14]

gollark: So```lualocal o = os.pullEventos.pullEvent = coroutine.yield-- after stuffos.pullEvent = o```
gollark: if it does, of course.
gollark: You probably want to revert that when the program *exits*.
gollark: > Which is exactly what they wanted here!Not necessarily, this actually does sound like a case where they might want each task to run in its own coroutines (or would, if their pathfinding did yields).
gollark: I mean, it's great for very simple situations where you want to run two things at once in the simplest case, but often projects want to run a listener "thread" and temporarily spawn tasks to handle them or something and this ends up being constantly reinvented.

See also

References
  1. Pittman, K. (1996) "Aging Out or Aging In?" Archived September 29, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Youth Today. January 1996. Retrieved 5/8/07.
  2. (2006) Trial Home Visits in Relation to "Aging Out of Foster Care" 624-10-01-40-05. State of North Dakota. Retrieved 5/8/07.
  3. (nd) [How Do I Prevent My Child From Losing Benefits at Age 21 ("Aging Out")?] United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Retrieved 5/8/07.
  4. Brackett, E. (2005) Aging Out of Foster Care, Newshour television show, PBS. May 19, 2005. Retrieved 5/8/07.
  5. Gypen, Laura; Vanderfaeillie, Johan; De Maeyer, Skrallan; Belenger, Laurence; Van Holen, Frank (May 2017). "Outcomes of children who grew up in foster care: Systematic-review". Children and Youth Services Review. 76: 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.035. ISSN 0190-7409.
  6. Dworsky, Amy; Napolitano, Laura; Courtney, Mark (December 2013). "Homelessness During the Transition From Foster Care to Adulthood". American Journal of Public Health. 103 (S2): S318–S323. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301455. ISSN 0090-0036.
  7. Pecora, Peter J.; Williams, Jason; Kessler, Ronald C.; Hiripi, Eva; O'Brien, Kirk; Emerson, John; Herrick, Mary A.; Torres, Dan (August 2006). "Assessing the educational achievements of adults who were formerly placed in family foster care". Child <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Family Social Work. 11 (3): 220–231. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00429.x. ISSN 1356-7500.
  8. Jackson, Sonia; Cameron, Claire (June 2012). "Leaving care: Looking ahead and aiming higher". Children and Youth Services Review. 34 (6): 1107–1114. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.041. ISSN 0190-7409.
  9. Day, Angelique; Dworsky, Amy; Fogarty, Kieran; Damashek, Amy (November 2011). "An examination of post-secondary retention and graduation among foster care youth enrolled in a four-year university". Children and Youth Services Review. 33 (11): 2335–2341. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.004. ISSN 0190-7409.
  10. Naccarato, Toni; Brophy, Megan; Courtney, Mark E. (July 2009). "WITHDRAWN: Employment outcomes of foster youth: The results from the Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of foster youth". Children and Youth Services Review. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.07.017. ISSN 0190-7409.
  11. (nd) Programs and Resources for Youth Aging Out of Foster Care Archived April 9, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. Child Welfare League of America. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  12. (2005) Foster care – hope emerges. Reform efforts gain momentum. San Francisco Chronicle. 12/22/05. Retrieved 5/8/07.
  13. Rhodes, L. (2006) "Young writers finding a powerful voice. Archived 2007-05-02 at the Wayback Machine" Retrieved 5/8/07.
  14. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-11-05. Retrieved 2009-11-12.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.