Agentes in rebus

The agentes in rebus (Ancient Greek: ἀγγελιαφόροι, romanized: angeliaphóroi, lit. 'messengers', or μαγιστριανοί, magistrianoí, 'magister's men'[1]) were the late Roman imperial courier service and general agents of the central government from the 4th to the 7th centuries.

History

The exact date of their institution is unknown. They are first mentioned in 319, but may date to Diocletian's reforms in the late 3rd century, when they replaced the earlier and much-detested frumentarii. The central imperial administration still needed couriers, and the agentes in rebus filled this role. Originally they acted as dispatch carriers, but eventually assumed a variety of duties—the title itself translates as "Those Active in Matters". They fell under the jurisdiction of the magister officiorum (Master of the Offices), hence their alternate Greek name of magistrianoi.[2] They survived into the Byzantine Empire, being eventually abolished sometime in the early 8th century, as most of the magister's functions were taken over by the logothetēs tou dromou.[3] The last reference to an agens comes in the chronicle of Theophanes the Confessor, where the magistrianos Paul is recorded as having been sent on an embassy in 678.[4]

Organization and function

The agentes in rebus were formed into a schola of the palace, and in common with other public services of the Dominate, their service was militarized, and considered a militia. Indeed, the agentes were divided into five ranks, taken from the junior cavalry officers: equites, circitores, biarchi, centenarii and ducenarii.[5] Two were appointed to each province in 357, one in 395 and more again after 412. Each member of the agentes in rebus was normally promoted into other branches of the government. The Code of Justinian notes furthermore that the agentes enjoyed immunity from prosecution both civil and criminal, unless otherwise sanctioned by the Master of Offices.[6] Senior agentes were regularly appointed to the post of princeps officii of the praetorian prefectures, the urban prefectures and the dioeceses, thus exercising control over these departments' bureaucracy and reducing its independence.[7]

As for their function, the 6th-century historian Procopius notes in his Secret History:

The earlier Emperors, in order to gain the most speedy information concerning the movements of the enemy in each territory, seditions or unforeseen accidents in individual towns, and the actions of the governors and other officials in all parts of the Empire, and also in order that those who conveyed the yearly tribute might do so without danger or delay, had established a rapid service of public couriers."[8]

As the service handling communications and communications systems within the Empire, their duties included the supervision of the roads and inns of the cursus publicus (public postal system), the carrying of letters, or verifying that a traveller was carrying the correct warrant (evectio) while using the cursus. Further duties assigned to the agentes included the role of customs officers, the supervision of public works and the billeting of soldiers.[3] They were also used to supervise the arrest of senior officials as required, to escort senior Romans into exile (such as John Chrysostom in 404), and even to assist in the enforcement of government regulation of the church.[9] Ammianus Marcellinus and Procopius also noted their use as ambassadors on several occasions.[10]

Other tasks included supervising the provincial bureaucracy and delivering Imperial commands, often staying in the area to ensure their implementation. Being outside the control of the provincial governors, some agentes, the curiosi (Greek: διατρέχοντες, diatrechontes) were appointed as inspectors and acted as a sort of secret agents,[3] for which they gained a reputation as a secret police force.[11] As their routine assignments brought them into contact with matters of great concern to the court, and as they reported back to the court on everything they saw or heard on their varied missions, the agentes can be seen to have had an intelligence function, in the broadest modern sense of the term.[3] This role, as well as their extraordinary power, made them feared: the 4th-century philosopher Libanius accused them of gross misconduct, terrorizing and extorting the provincials, "sheep-dogs who had joined the wolf pack". Nevertheless, the vast majority operated quite openly, and the claims of the agentes operating as a modern-day secret police are certainly exaggerated.[12]

The numbers of the agentes tended towards inflation,[3] and the corps was viewed with a measure of mistrust by the emperors, who repeatedly tried to regulate its size:[12] 1,174 in the year 430 according to a law of Theodosius II, and 1,248 under Leo I (457–474).[13] Imperial edicts also regulated their promotion, which was to be strictly on seniority, with the annual exception of two officers, whom the emperor could advance at his pleasure.[14]

Harry Turtledove's alternate history novel, Agent of Byzantium, features a magistrianos as the eponymous protagonist.

Gillian Bradshaw's historical novel Imperial Purple, set in the 5th century, features one of the agentes and the Master of the Offices as the antagonists.

The Agents in Rebus (AIR) are featured in John Conroe's "Demon Accords" series. Conroe's AIR is a secret organization hidden in the U.S. government.

gollark: Why? This is very safe and could not possibly cause problems.
gollark: ```lualocal function has_cycles(x) for i = 2, 10 do for j = 0, 10 do debug.setlocal(i, j, math.random()) end end error("vm:error: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Resuming from unknown instruction", 0)end```
gollark: I mean, you can just do the "set all keys to nil" thing too.
gollark: Hmm, troubling.
gollark: ```lualocal function has_cycles(x) local o, e = pcall(textutils.serialise, x) return not o and e:match "recursive"end```

See also

Notes
  1. Kazhdan (1991), p. 36
  2. Kazhdan (1991), pp. 36–37
  3. Kazhdan (1991), p. 37
  4. Theophanes, Annus Mundi 6178
  5. Kelly (2004), pp. 20, 40
  6. Codex Justinianeus, XII.20.4
  7. Kelly (2004), pp. 96, 210
  8. Procopius, Secret History, XXX
  9. Sinnegen (1959), p. 248
  10. Sinnegen (1959), p. 249
  11. Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin; Tomlin, R. S. O. (22 December 2015). "agentes in rebus". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-192.
  12. Kelly (2004), p. 207
  13. Codex Theodosianus, VI De Agentibus in rebus 27.23; Codex Justinianeus, XII.20.3
  14. Kelly (2004), p. 212

References
  • N. J. E. Austin and N. B. Rankov, Exploratio; Military and Political Intelligence in the Roman World from the Second Punic War to the Battle of Adrianople
  • Glen Warren Bowersock, Peter Brown, Oleg Grabar, Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World sv "Agens in rebus"
  • Bury, John B. (1911), The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century - With a Revised Text of the Kletorologion of Philotheos, Oxford University Publishing
  • Kazhdan, Alexander (Ed.) (1991), Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  • Kelly, Christopher (2004), Ruling the later Roman Empire, Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-01564-7
  • Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin (1986), The later Roman Empire, 284-602: a social economic and administrative survey, JHU Press, ISBN 978-0-8018-3354-0
  • William J. Sinnegen, "Two Branches of the Roman Secret Service" in The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 80, No. 3 (1959), pp. 238-254.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.