8×22mm Nambu

The 8×22mm Nambu is a semi-rimmed, bottleneck handgun cartridge introduced in Japan in 1904.

8×22mm Nambu
Japanese military pistol cartridge.
TypePistol
Submachine gun
Place of originJapan
Service history
In service1904–1945
Used byJapan
WarsWorld War I
Second Sino-Japanese War
World War II
Production history
DesignerKijiro Nambu
Designed1902
Specifications
Case typeBottleneck semirimed
Bullet diameter8.13 mm (0.320 in)
Neck diameter8.71 mm (0.343 in)
Shoulder diameter10.00 mm (0.394 in)
Base diameter10.23 mm (0.403 in)
Rim diameter10.50 mm (0.413 in)
Rim thickness0.92 mm (0.036 in)
Case length21.43 mm (0.844 in)
Overall length31.56 mm (1.243 in)
Primer typesmall pistol
Ballistic performance
Bullet mass/type Velocity Energy
102 gr (7 g) FMJ 290 m/s (950 ft/s) 274 J (202 ft⋅lbf)
Test barrel length: 117 mm (4.61 in)

History

It was used in the Type A and B Nambus, Type 14 Nambu and Type 94 pistols, Tokyo Arsenal Model 1927, Type II machine pistol, Hino Komuro M1908 pistol and the Type 100 submachine gun. It uses 8.2 mm (.320") bullets. Power is relatively low, with military loads developing about 280 J (200 foot·pounds), comparable to the American .380 ACP and substantially weaker than contemporary military cartridges such as 9×19mm Parabellum, .45 ACP, and 7.62×25mm Tokarev.

Like almost all of the Imperial Japanese weapon designs of that era, production of 8 mm Nambu ammunition ceased after the end of World War II, as the weapons that fired it were removed from service. Some small-scale production (primarily using remanufactured brass) has occurred in the United States, but handloading is more common among owners of 8 mm Nambu pistols. New manufactured brass and copper plated lead bullets (.320") are available through HDS. Reloadable cases might be formed from .40" S&W, but this would require swaging the case heads down from .424" to .403" in a hydraulic press. A regular reloading press would quickly be ruined by this sort of operation.

The Japanese Army cartridges in 8 mm Nambu have no markings on the headstamp, unlike the Japanese Navy cartridges.

gollark: Just patch the interpreter?
gollark: GPUs do this, kind of. GPUs are fast. Therefore, do this.
gollark: Obvious objections:- "what do you even mean, gollark, that sounds like just ILP but stupider" - maybe, yes, the main difference being execution of separate bits of the program at once- "why did you just invent SIMD but worse, ish" - oops- "but cache contention" - too bad, consume bees
gollark: Well, the obvious* solution to program counter counterness is to just add more program counters, by which I mean hardware-accelerated greenerer threads with no context-switching overhead for more effectively utilizing execution units.
gollark: Advantages of expanding out powers:- leaves less RAM unused. Unused RAM is wasted RAM!- differentiation can be defined more lazily- palaiologos suffers- fewer rulesDisadvantages:- none

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.