682 BC
The year 682 BC was a year of the pre-Julian Roman calendar. In the Roman Empire, it was known as year 72 Ab urbe condita . The denomination 682 BC for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.
Millennium: | 1st millennium BC |
---|---|
Centuries: | |
Decades: | |
Years: |
682 BC by topic |
Politics |
---|
Categories |
|
Gregorian calendar | 682 BC DCLXXXI BC |
Ab urbe condita | 72 |
Ancient Egypt era | XXV dynasty, 71 |
- Pharaoh | Taharqa, 9 |
Ancient Greek era | 24th Olympiad, year 3 |
Assyrian calendar | 4069 |
Balinese saka calendar | N/A |
Bengali calendar | −1274 |
Berber calendar | 269 |
Buddhist calendar | −137 |
Burmese calendar | −1319 |
Byzantine calendar | 4827–4828 |
Chinese calendar | 戊戌年 (Earth Dog) 2015 or 1955 — to — 己亥年 (Earth Pig) 2016 or 1956 |
Coptic calendar | −965 – −964 |
Discordian calendar | 485 |
Ethiopian calendar | −689 – −688 |
Hebrew calendar | 3079–3080 |
Hindu calendars | |
- Vikram Samvat | −625 – −624 |
- Shaka Samvat | N/A |
- Kali Yuga | 2419–2420 |
Holocene calendar | 9319 |
Iranian calendar | 1303 BP – 1302 BP |
Islamic calendar | 1343 BH – 1342 BH |
Javanese calendar | N/A |
Julian calendar | N/A |
Korean calendar | 1652 |
Minguo calendar | 2593 before ROC 民前2593年 |
Nanakshahi calendar | −2149 |
Thai solar calendar | −139 – −138 |
Tibetan calendar | 阳土狗年 (male Earth-Dog) −555 or −936 or −1708 — to — 阴土猪年 (female Earth-Pig) −554 or −935 or −1707 |
Events
By place
Middle East
- Urtaki succeeds Shilnak-Inshushinak as the king of Elam.[1]
- This is the last year of the reign of Sennacherib, king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire.
Births
Deaths
- Zhou zhuang wang, King of the Zhou Dynasty of China.
gollark: Those are fairly C-like with the main difference being better memory management and some level of object orientation.
gollark: What languages are you meaning specifically? There are many not-particularly-C-like ones.
gollark: I think making a less efficient Python program (with intensive mathy things done via numpy etc. which use bindings to C) makes a lot more sense than having a possibly-faster C program which takes several times longer to write, in most cases.
gollark: It's a poor performance decision (although you can just use pypy, which doesn't have that), sure.
gollark: Although all the tooling and CPUs are optimized for the C model, so good luck changing anything ever.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.