632 BC
The year 632 BC was a year of the pre-Julian Roman calendar. In the Roman Empire, it was known as year 122 Ab urbe condita . The denomination 632 BC for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.
Millennium: | 1st millennium BC |
---|---|
Centuries: | |
Decades: | |
Years: |
632 BC by topic |
Politics |
---|
Categories |
|
Gregorian calendar | 632 BC DCXXXI BC |
Ab urbe condita | 122 |
Ancient Egypt era | XXVI dynasty, 33 |
- Pharaoh | Psamtik I, 33 |
Ancient Greek era | 37th Olympiad (victor)¹ |
Assyrian calendar | 4119 |
Balinese saka calendar | N/A |
Bengali calendar | −1224 |
Berber calendar | 319 |
Buddhist calendar | −87 |
Burmese calendar | −1269 |
Byzantine calendar | 4877–4878 |
Chinese calendar | 戊子年 (Earth Rat) 2065 or 2005 — to — 己丑年 (Earth Ox) 2066 or 2006 |
Coptic calendar | −915 – −914 |
Discordian calendar | 535 |
Ethiopian calendar | −639 – −638 |
Hebrew calendar | 3129–3130 |
Hindu calendars | |
- Vikram Samvat | −575 – −574 |
- Shaka Samvat | N/A |
- Kali Yuga | 2469–2470 |
Holocene calendar | 9369 |
Iranian calendar | 1253 BP – 1252 BP |
Islamic calendar | 1291 BH – 1290 BH |
Javanese calendar | N/A |
Julian calendar | N/A |
Korean calendar | 1702 |
Minguo calendar | 2543 before ROC 民前2543年 |
Nanakshahi calendar | −2099 |
Thai solar calendar | −89 – −88 |
Tibetan calendar | 阳土鼠年 (male Earth-Rat) −505 or −886 or −1658 — to — 阴土牛年 (female Earth-Ox) −504 or −885 or −1657 |
Deaths
- Cheng Dechen, Chinese prime minister of Chu
- Cylon, Athenian nobleman and usurper
gollark: I wonder how long it'll be before someone makes Unicode Turing-complete.
gollark: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/5penft/parallelizing_enjarify_in_go_and_rust/dcsgk7n/I think this just wonderfully encapsulates Go.
gollark: Oh, it also has that weird conditional compile thing depending on `_linux.go` suffixes or `_test.go` ones I think?
gollark: Okay, sure, you can ignore that for Go itself, if we had Go-with-an-alternate-compiler-but-identical-language-bits it would be irrelevant.
gollark: I can't easily come up with a *ton* of examples of this, but stuff like generics being special-cased in for three types (because guess what, you *do* actually need them), certain basic operations returning either one or two values depending on how you interact with them, quirks of nil/closed channel operations, the standard library secretly having a `recover` mechanism and using it like exceptions a bit, multiple return values which are not first-class at all and which are used as a horrible, horrible way to do error handling, and all of go assembly, are just inconsistent and odd.
References
- E.J. Bickerman, Chronology of the Ancient World (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1968), p. 198
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.