2019 Berkeley Tennis Club Challenge – Doubles
Nicole Gibbs and Asia Muhammad were the defending champions, but both players chose not to participate.[1]
Doubles | |
---|---|
2019 Berkeley Tennis Club Challenge | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–3, 7–5 |
Madison Brengle and Sachia Vickery won the title, defeating Francesca Di Lorenzo and Katie Swan in the final, 6–3, 7–5.
Seeds
Giuliana Olmos / Luisa Stefani (Semifinals) Hsieh Yu-chieh / You Xiaodi (Quarterfinals) Han Na-lae / Hiroko Kuwata (Quarterfinals) Chen Pei-hsuan / Wu Fang-hsien (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 77 | [9] | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 62 | [11] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 64 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 65 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 2 | [5] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 1 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 0 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: And any system giving out more would result in them getting them faster.
gollark: The other 10% *would* be annoyed, but there would be fewer of them.
gollark: There aren't many prize owners, or the prize thing would be less problematic/controversial.
gollark: If they were in the market, you could actually work towards them rather than "you tried for several years, but nope".
gollark: The amount of prize owners is *really small*, so not really.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.